FERC Reduces New England Transmission Owners’ Base ROE to 10.57 percent and Caps Total ROE at 11.74 percent

Oct 17, 2014

Reading Time : 1 min

Following the paper hearing, FERC in Opinion No. 531-A found that the long-term GDP growth rate is the appropriate long-term growth rate to use in the two-step DCF methodology and that 4.39 percent is the appropriate GDP growth rate to use to calculate the NETOs’ base ROE.  The parties did not contest either of these matters.  Applying the two-step DCF methodology with a 4.39 percent long-term GDP growth rate, FERC determined that the NETOs’ existing 11.14 percent base ROE is unjust and unreasonable, that a just and reasonable base ROE for the NETOs is 10.57 percent, and that the NETOs’ maximum ROE, including incentives, cannot exceed 11.74 percent, the top of the zone of reasonableness of 7.03 to 11.74 percent.  Accordingly, FERC directed the NETOs to make refunds, with interest, for the 15-month refund period from October 1, 2011, to December 31, 2012.

Importantly, FERC in Opinion No. 531-A did not address arguments regarding whether the projected long-term GDP growth rate of 4.39 percent used for the NETOs should represent an upper or lower limit on the long-term growth component of the two-step DCF methodology, and, accordingly, it could reach a different result in other ROE cases.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

June 25, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to the California Independent System Operator Corporation (CAISO) directing CAISO and CAISO transmission owners to show cause as to why CAISO’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (California Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., 195 FERC ¶ 61,214 (2026) (the Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 24, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to New York Independent System Operator, Inc. (NYISO) directing NYISO and NYISO transmission owners to show cause as to why NYISO’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (New York Independent System Operator, Inc., 195 FERC ¶ 61,216 (2026) (Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 23, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. (MISO) directing MISO and MISO transmission owners to show cause as to why MISO’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., 195 FERC ¶ 61,212 (2026) (Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 23, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. directing PJM and PJM transmission owners to show cause as to why PJM’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 195 FERC ¶ 61,211 (2026) (the Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.