FERC Seeks Comments on Risks to Bulk Electric System from Equipment and Services from Entities Identified as Risks to National Security

Sep 24, 2020

Reading Time : 3 min

FERC stated that, since it approved the first set of supply chain risk management Reliability Standards in Order No. 850 in October 2018,4 “there have been significant developments in the form of Executive Orders, legislation, as well as federal agency actions that raise concerns over the potential risks posed by the use of equipment and services provided by [such] entities.”5 These include President Trump’s May 2019 Executive Order 13873 on “Securing the Information and Communications Technology and Services Supply Chain” and May 2020 Executive Order on “Securing the United States Bulk-Power System,” the latter of which we addressed here and here.

Citing the “critical role played by communications networks in maintaining bulk electric system reliability by, among other things, helping to maintain situational awareness and reliable bulk electric system operations through timely and accurate measurement, collection, processing of bulk electric system status and information exchange among control centers,” FERC found it “necessary . . . to understand the risk to bulk electric system reliability posed by the use of equipment and services provided by . . . entities identified as risks to national security.”6 Equipment of concern includes networking and telecommunications equipment and components as well as other “electrical equipment commonly used in substations, generating stations, and control rooms.”7

FERC seeks comments on the following six issues:

  • The extent of the use of equipment and services provided by Covered Companies related to bulk electric system operations.
  • The risks to bulk electric system reliability and security posed by the use of such equipment and services provided by Covered Companies.
  • Whether current Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) Reliability Standards adequately mitigate the identified risks.
  • What mandatory actions FERC could consider taking to mitigate the risk of equipment and services of concern.
  • Strategies that entities have implemented or plan to implement—in addition to compliance with the mandatory CIP Reliability Standards—to mitigate the risks associated with use of equipment and services of concern.
  • Other methods FERC might employ to address its concerns, including working collaboratively with industry to raise awareness about the identified risks and assisting with mitigating actions (i.e., such as facilitating information sharing).8

FERC included a set of specific questions for commenters to address, but noted that commenters need not address every issue or answer every question.9 Chairman Neil Chatterjee noted during FERC’s open meeting on September 17, 2020, that, “although the [bulk-power system] executive order did not include any directives to this Commission, I believe it is incumbent on us as the agency overseeing the reliability and security of the grid to fully understand these risks and take appropriate action. That is exactly what we are doing by issuing today’s Notice of Inquiry. Once comments are filed, we will review the record and determine what further actions the Commission should take.”

Commissioner Richard Glick added that he believes “it is likely that [FERC] will need to do more than [it] and NERC have already done with regard to protecting the supply chain,” noting that while the NOI repeatedly references equipment provided by certain entities with ties to China, FERC’s “inquiry goes further than that. We also need to consider threats from equipment and services provided by other entities, including companies with ties to Russia and Iran.” He also noted that he is pleased that FERC is “looking beyond hardware equipment” because “software provided by entities with connections to adversaries [may] also pose a threat.”

Comments on the NOI are due November 23, 2020, and reply comments are due December 22, 2020.10


1 Equip. & Servs. Produced or Provided by Certain Entities Identified as Risks to Nat’l Sec., 85 Fed. Reg. 59,785, at P 1 (Sept. 23, 2020) (NOI).

2 Id. PP 11, 19.

3 Id. P 14.

4 Supply Chain Risk Mgmt. Reliability Standards, Order No. 850, 165 FERC ¶ 61,020 (2018) (approving Reliability Standards CIP-013-1 (Cyber Security – Supply Chain Risk Management), CIP-005-6 (Cyber Security – Electronic Security Perimeter(s)), and CIP-010-3 (Cyber Security – Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments)).

5 NOI at P 3.

6 Id. P 16.

7 Id. PP 17, 18.

8 Id. P 4.

9 Id. P 20.

10 Id. P 21.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

August 15, 2025

On August 8, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued an enforcement order in Skye MS, LLC (Skye) and levied a $45,000 civil penalty on an intrastate pipeline operator in Mississippi, resolving an investigation into the operator’s violations of section 311 (Section 311) of the Natural Gas Policy Act (NGPA). FERC faulted the operator for providing a Section 311 transportation service without timely filing a Statement of Operating Conditions (SOC) and obtaining FERC’s approval for the transportation rates. Section 311 permits intrastate pipelines to transport interstate gas “on behalf of” interstate pipelines without becoming subject to FERC’s more extensive Natural Gas Act (NGA) jurisdiction, but requires the intrastate pipeline to have an SOC stating the rates and terms and conditions of service on file with FERC within 30 days of providing the interstate service. Under the NGPA, Section 311 rates must be “fair and equitable” and approved by FERC. In Skye, FERC stated that the operator began providing Section 311 service on certain pipeline segments in Mississippi in May 2023, following their acquisition from another Section 311 operator, but did not file an SOC with FERC until April 2025. The order ties the penalty to the approximately two-year delay between commencement of the Section 311 service and the SOC filing date. The pipeline operator was also ordered to provide an annual compliance report and to abide by additional verification requirements related to the filing of its FERC Form No. 549D, the Quarterly Transportation & Storage Report for Intrastate Natural Gas and Hinshaw Pipelines.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

August 6, 2025

In Sierra Club v. FERC, No. 24-1199 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 1, 2025), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) upheld the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) approval of a 1,000-foot natural gas pipeline segment crossing the United States-Mexico border (the Border Pipeline) under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), rejecting environmental groups’ challenges that FERC improperly limited its analysis under both the NGA and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as related to a 155-mile intrastate “Connector Pipeline” constructed upstream of the Border Pipeline in Texas.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 17, 2025

On July 15, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) issued an order1 proposing to eliminate the soft price cap of $1,000 per megawatt-hour (MWh) for bilateral spot sales in the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) that was implemented following the California energy crisis. If adopted, the Commission’s proposal would eliminate the requirement that sellers make a filing with FERC cost justifying spot market sales in excess of the soft price cap, which have become increasingly common in recent years as market conditions have continued to tighten throughout the West. Eliminating the WECC soft price cap would provide sellers that make sales during periods when prices exceed the cap greater certainty that their sales will not be second guessed after the fact.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 25, 2025

On June 4–5, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) hosted a commissioner-led technical conference to discuss resource adequacy challenges facing regional transmission organizations and independent system operators (RTO). The conference is a response to the growing concern that multiple RTO regions across the country may not have sufficient supply available in the coming years to meet demand due to resource retirements, the pace of new generation entry and higher load growth arising from the construction of data centers and reindustrialization.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 12, 2025

We are pleased to share the presentation slide deck and a recording of Akin’s recently presented webinar, “Navigating U.S. Policy Shifts in the Critical Minerals Sector.”

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 10, 2025

On June 4, 2025, the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) announced revisions to its procedures for pipeline safety enforcement actions. The changes, outlined in two new policy memoranda from PHMSA’s Office of the Chief Counsel (PHC), aim to enhance due process protections for pipeline operators by clarifying how civil penalties are calculated and expanding the disclosure of agency records in enforcement proceedings.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

May 22, 2025

On May 19, 2025, the Department of Energy (DOE) finalized its 2024 LNG Export Study: Energy, Economic and Environmental Assessment of U.S. LNG Exports (the 2024 Study) through the release of a Response to Comments on the 2024 Study. The Response to Comments concludes that the 2024 Study, as augmented through public comments submitted on or before March 20, 2025, supporting a finding that liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports serve the public interest. With the comment process complete, DOE will move forward with final orders on pending applications to export LNG to non-free trade agreement (non-FTA) countries.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

May 20, 2025

On Thursday, May 15, the Senate Commerce, Science & Transportation Subcommittee on Surface Transportation, Freight, Pipelines and Safety held a hearing titled, “Pipeline Safety Reauthorization: Ensuring the Safe and Efficient Movement of American Energy.” The hearing examined legislative priorities for reauthorizing the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA).

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.