FERC Seeks Comments on Risks to Bulk Electric System from Equipment and Services from Entities Identified as Risks to National Security

Sep 24, 2020

Reading Time : 3 min

FERC stated that, since it approved the first set of supply chain risk management Reliability Standards in Order No. 850 in October 2018,4 “there have been significant developments in the form of Executive Orders, legislation, as well as federal agency actions that raise concerns over the potential risks posed by the use of equipment and services provided by [such] entities.”5 These include President Trump’s May 2019 Executive Order 13873 on “Securing the Information and Communications Technology and Services Supply Chain” and May 2020 Executive Order on “Securing the United States Bulk-Power System,” the latter of which we addressed here and here.

Citing the “critical role played by communications networks in maintaining bulk electric system reliability by, among other things, helping to maintain situational awareness and reliable bulk electric system operations through timely and accurate measurement, collection, processing of bulk electric system status and information exchange among control centers,” FERC found it “necessary . . . to understand the risk to bulk electric system reliability posed by the use of equipment and services provided by . . . entities identified as risks to national security.”6 Equipment of concern includes networking and telecommunications equipment and components as well as other “electrical equipment commonly used in substations, generating stations, and control rooms.”7

FERC seeks comments on the following six issues:

  • The extent of the use of equipment and services provided by Covered Companies related to bulk electric system operations.
  • The risks to bulk electric system reliability and security posed by the use of such equipment and services provided by Covered Companies.
  • Whether current Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) Reliability Standards adequately mitigate the identified risks.
  • What mandatory actions FERC could consider taking to mitigate the risk of equipment and services of concern.
  • Strategies that entities have implemented or plan to implement—in addition to compliance with the mandatory CIP Reliability Standards—to mitigate the risks associated with use of equipment and services of concern.
  • Other methods FERC might employ to address its concerns, including working collaboratively with industry to raise awareness about the identified risks and assisting with mitigating actions (i.e., such as facilitating information sharing).8

FERC included a set of specific questions for commenters to address, but noted that commenters need not address every issue or answer every question.9 Chairman Neil Chatterjee noted during FERC’s open meeting on September 17, 2020, that, “although the [bulk-power system] executive order did not include any directives to this Commission, I believe it is incumbent on us as the agency overseeing the reliability and security of the grid to fully understand these risks and take appropriate action. That is exactly what we are doing by issuing today’s Notice of Inquiry. Once comments are filed, we will review the record and determine what further actions the Commission should take.”

Commissioner Richard Glick added that he believes “it is likely that [FERC] will need to do more than [it] and NERC have already done with regard to protecting the supply chain,” noting that while the NOI repeatedly references equipment provided by certain entities with ties to China, FERC’s “inquiry goes further than that. We also need to consider threats from equipment and services provided by other entities, including companies with ties to Russia and Iran.” He also noted that he is pleased that FERC is “looking beyond hardware equipment” because “software provided by entities with connections to adversaries [may] also pose a threat.”

Comments on the NOI are due November 23, 2020, and reply comments are due December 22, 2020.10


1 Equip. & Servs. Produced or Provided by Certain Entities Identified as Risks to Nat’l Sec., 85 Fed. Reg. 59,785, at P 1 (Sept. 23, 2020) (NOI).

2 Id. PP 11, 19.

3 Id. P 14.

4 Supply Chain Risk Mgmt. Reliability Standards, Order No. 850, 165 FERC ¶ 61,020 (2018) (approving Reliability Standards CIP-013-1 (Cyber Security – Supply Chain Risk Management), CIP-005-6 (Cyber Security – Electronic Security Perimeter(s)), and CIP-010-3 (Cyber Security – Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments)).

5 NOI at P 3.

6 Id. P 16.

7 Id. PP 17, 18.

8 Id. P 4.

9 Id. P 20.

10 Id. P 21.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

March 19, 2026

International trade policy has emerged as a dominant force shaping the oil & gas sector, with sweeping tariffs imposed on products from virtually every nation using authorities including IEEPA, Section 232 and Section 301. President Trump's "America First Trade Policy" leverages duties as negotiation tools to secure bilateral deals featuring significant oil & gas purchase commitments, making trade considerations essential for any cross-border transaction. Energy dominance serves as a cornerstone of the administration's economic and national security strategy, placing the industry squarely in the spotlight. 

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

March 10, 2026

Federal energy regulators are assuming expanded roles as the administration prioritizes energy dominance and infrastructure development to meet unprecedented power demand. FERC Chairman Laura Swett has vowed to expedite data center interconnections while addressing jurisdictional challenges, warning that unmet electricity demand could drive data centers abroad and create national security risks. The agency is processing pipeline applications faster than in prior years and considering blanket authorizations for certain LNG and hydroelectric projects to streamline approvals. 

Pipeline projects previously stalled by Clean Water Act permits are being revitalized, particularly in northeastern states where historically high electricity prices have increased openness to natural gas infrastructure. The Department of Energy is expanding its emergency authority to require retention of generation resources and has granted major LNG export approvals, signaling commitment to expanding U.S. export capacity under a streamlined framework that deprioritizes climate considerations.  

The Administration is bullish on the opportunities for the U.S. energy industry in Venezuela and eager to support companies willing to navigate the political risk inherent in the operations at the moment. Early meetings with President Trump and industry leaders showed the path forward may be longer and more complex than anticipated by the President. 

As permitting reforms advance and the pendulum swings toward fossil fuel favorability, the regulatory and policy landscape is fundamentally reshaping energy infrastructure development timelines and investment opportunities. 

Oil & Gas in 2026: Energy Policy & Regulation 

Delve into the complete regulatory & policy outlook at our Oil & Gas in 2026 report.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

March 3, 2026

Macroeconomic turbulence and volatile commodity markets significantly influenced oil & gas M&A activity throughout 2025, with deals showing renewed momentum only in the year's second half.  

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 24, 2026

On February 19, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued an order rescinding the soft price cap for bilateral spot market energy sales in the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) region.1 As previously covered, on July 15, 2025, FERC initiated a Federal Power Act Section 206 proceeding following the D.C. Circuit’s decision finding that FERC must apply the Mobile-Sierra public interest standard before ordering refunds for above-cap bilateral sales and vacating FERC’s orders requiring refunds for certain bilateral spot market transactions in the WECC region that exceeded the $1,000 MWh soft price cap.2 FERC’s Order follows through on the proposal it made last July to eliminate the WECCs soft price cap and marks a recognition that Western wholesale markets have evolved over the past two decades to become sufficiently competitive to render the soft price cap unnecessary.  

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.