FERC to EPA: We Are Here to Help on CPP

Jun 2, 2015

Reading Time : 1 min

The first proposal is the so-called “Reliability Safety Valve.”  Under this proposal, the EPA would adopt a clearly defined role for FERC to review a petitioner’s claims that unforeseen or emergency system conditions will result in a violation of FERC-approved reliability standards or in a reserve margin deficiency unless a CPP compliance obligation is adjusted.  The commissioners were clear to note that their role here would not involve assessing whether the petitioner made sufficient efforts to resolve the possible violation or whether there are other ways to resolve the deficiency.  Rather, FERC’s role would be only to “consider whether a specified set of loads, resources and grid facilities would cause a Reliability Standard violation or reserve margin deficiency.”  The commissioners’ letter did not specify the level of deference or consideration that the EPA should give to FERC’s findings.

The commissioners also discussed the possibility of FERC’s role in “Reliability Monitoring and Assistance.”  This type of monitoring process would occur prior to, or in parallel with, the EPA’s review of state CPP carbon reduction plans and would allow FERC to review such plans for an assessment of potential reliability concerns.  The commissioners explained that FERC-regulated Regional Transmission Operators and Independent System Operators, as well as entities such as North American Electric Reliability Council, currently have processes in place to assess the reliability of the grid.  FERC could have these entities use their existing processes to analyze proposed state plans, FERC explained, and then FERC could review the analyses and provide the EPA with formal input on how the state plans affect reliability. The commissioners also contemplated FERC having the ability to request additional or modified analyses or, in limited circumstances, performing analyses itself.

FERC has been proactive thus far in anticipation of the EPA’s final rule. The agency recently held a series of technical conferences focused on how the CPP may affect three aspects of FERC’s jurisdiction: electric reliability, energy infrastructure and wholesale energy markets.  For previous Speaking Energy coverage of the CPP proposal, click here

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

February 10, 2026

The global energy sector enters 2026 amid major policy shifts, geopolitical tension and evolving market dynamics. The Trump administration’s reversal of Biden-era climate initiatives and renewed emphasis on domestic production have reshaped the policy landscape, offering a more favorable regulatory environment even as conflicts abroad, oil price volatility and shifting trade policies tempered deal activity through 2025.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

January 22, 2026

On January 16, 2026, the National Energy Dominance Council (NDEC) and governors from each of the 13 states in PJM issued a Statement of Principles urging PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) to hold an emergency backstop auction and take other measures to support the entry of new capacity to preserve the reliability of the PJM region. The Statement of Principles calls on PJM to expeditiously file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) tariff revisions that would overhaul aspects of PJM’s market rules to address rising electricity prices and growing reliability risks in the PJM region. The Statement of Principles comes at a time of growing concern that PJM will not have sufficient capacity in the coming years to meet demand due to the retirement of existing generation resources, the glacial pace of new entry and projected increased demand associated with data center development.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

December 21, 2025

On December 19, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued its much-anticipated order on show cause proceeding concerning the co-location of generation and load within the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) market.[1] In the order, the Commission finds that PJM’s tariff is unjust and unreasonable because it does not provide sufficient clarity on the rates, terms, and conditions of service applicable to generators serving Co-Located Load and does not include transmission services appropriate for customers that are willing and able to limit their use of the transmission system in certain conditions. 

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

November 25, 2025

We are pleased to share the program materials and a recording of Akin’s recently presented webinar, “Navigating the Evolving Landscape of Corporate PPAs.”

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.