Indonesia’s New CCS/CCUS Regulations: Promoting Energy Transition in Southeast Asia

April 13, 2023

Reading Time : 4 min

In March 2023, Indonesia’s Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources, Arifin Tasrif, announced the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation No. 2 of 2023 concerning Implementation of Carbon Capture and Storage, as well as Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage in Upstream Oil and Gas Business Activities (the “MEMR 2/2023”). Indonesia, which has geological formations well suited to the development of carbon capture and storage (“CCS”) as well as carbon capture, utilization and storage (“CCUS”) projects, has become one of the first countries in Southeast Asia to promulgate regulations to support the integration of CCS/CCUS projects within upstream exploration and production activities with the goal of helping to decarbonize the industry.

MEMR 2/2023

According to the International Energy Agency, “successfully deploying CCUS relies on the establishment of legal and regulatory frameworks to ensure the effective stewardship of CCUS activities and the safe and secure storage of CO21. MEMR 2/2023 (which consists of 11 chapters and 61 articles) has been drafted with the goal of encouraging the development of commercial scale CCS/CCUS projects in Indonesia. Some of the key items addressed in MEMR 2/2023 include:

  • before commencement of a CCS/CCUS project, a proposal or a plan which addresses the feasibility of the proposed CCS/CCUS project in terms of its compliance with applicable standards and good practice principles needs to be submitted by the contractor of the relevant upstream working area to a government unit called the Special Work Unit for Upstream Oil and Gas Activities (Satuan Kerja Khusus Pelaksana Kegiatan Usaha Hulu Minyak dan Gas Bumi or “SKK Migas”) or (in the context of projects related to concessions in Aceh province) the Aceh Oil and Gas Management Agency (Badan Pengelola Migas Aceh or the “BPMA”);
  • once the above proposal or plan is approved by the relevant regulator, the contractor may carry out the CCS/CCUS activities, provided that (i) a series of ongoing monitoring activities is also untaken in parallel to ensure compliance with health, safety, environmental and social aspects of the CCS/CCUS project, (ii) such monitoring obligation continues for a period of up to 10 years after the closure of CCS/CCUS activities and (iii) a reserve account (which shall be a joint account established and maintained on behalf of the contractor and SKK Migas/BPMA) is funded during the 10-year period to ensure the monitoring activities can be undertaken even after decommissioning;
  • in order to proceed with closure of CCS/CCUS activities and transfer a contractor’s rights, obligations and responsibilities for the CCS/CCUS project back to the state, the contractor needs to verify with the Directorate General of Oil and Gas or a third-party verification body that, among others, there is no leakage, ground water contamination or other risks from any of the project facilities and adequate measures have been taken to prevent any future leakage; and
  • carbon trading and reimbursement of operational costs for the use of joint facilities can be ways to monetize a CCS/CCUS project, and the CCS/CCUS project may also benefit from tax incentives applicable to the upstream oil and gas business activities (e.g., exemption from import taxes).

Although the regulation does provide some much needed clarity around the scope and requirements of CCS/CCUS activities, there are a number of issues that remain to be addressed, including leakage risk, allocation of title and risk in the context of commingled carbon and ensuring quality specifications. It is also unclear to what extent Indonesia will look to offer financial incentives to attract investment across the CCS/CCUS value chain, and it will be interesting to see whether the Indonesian government will follow jurisdictions such as the United States, the United Kingdom and Europe by introducing tax breaks and credits for CCUS technologies.

Catalyst for the Neighboring Countries?

CCS/CCUS technologies are set to play an important role in supporting the clean energy transition across Southeast Asia. Indonesia’s neighboring countries Malaysia, Vietnam, Thailand and the Philippines all have potential for geological storage of CO2andare working to draft their own regulations and so are likely closely monitoring the developments in Indonesia and the impact MEME 2/2023 has on the development of domestic CCS/CCUS projects.

It would be especially interesting to see whether Malaysia will quickly follow Indonesia’s footsteps and announce its own regulations, given Malaysia through its well-established oil and gas industry was positioning itself to be a CCS/CCUS leading destination in Southeast Asia. Malaysia was already moving ahead with projects such as the Kasawari offshore CCS project and the Lang Lebah offshore CCS project, and Malaysia’s PETRONAS has signed a Memorandum of Understanding in August 2022 with six South Korean companies (Samsung Engineering Co., Ltd., Samsung Heavy Industries, SK Earthon Co., Ltd., SK Energy Co., Ltd., GS Energy Corporation and Lotte Chemical Co.) to undertake conceptual and feasibility studies towards establishing a full value chain related to CCUS, but currently there is no CCS/CCUS-specific law in Malaysia.

Also, we may wait and see whether Indonesia’s MEMR 2/2023 could serve as a stepping stone towards discussion around regional cooperation. Although domestic regulations such as MEMR 2/2023 will be important to the development of domestic CCS/CCUS projects, regional cooperation will be absolutely critical to unlock the region’s vast carbon-capture potential. A series of issues will inevitably arise in a cross-border context, so without regional cooperation to foster confidence and certainty around a cross-border/transboundary legal and regulatory regime, the idea of transporting CO2from Singapore to Indonesia through pipeline or shipping CO2from countries such as Japan and South Korea to Malaysia may merely remain a lofty ambition.


1https://www.iea.org/reports/legal-and-regulatory-frameworks-for-ccus

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

August 15, 2025

On August 8, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued an enforcement order in Skye MS, LLC (Skye) and levied a $45,000 civil penalty on an intrastate pipeline operator in Mississippi, resolving an investigation into the operator’s violations of section 311 (Section 311) of the Natural Gas Policy Act (NGPA). FERC faulted the operator for providing a Section 311 transportation service without timely filing a Statement of Operating Conditions (SOC) and obtaining FERC’s approval for the transportation rates. Section 311 permits intrastate pipelines to transport interstate gas “on behalf of” interstate pipelines without becoming subject to FERC’s more extensive Natural Gas Act (NGA) jurisdiction, but requires the intrastate pipeline to have an SOC stating the rates and terms and conditions of service on file with FERC within 30 days of providing the interstate service. Under the NGPA, Section 311 rates must be “fair and equitable” and approved by FERC. In Skye, FERC stated that the operator began providing Section 311 service on certain pipeline segments in Mississippi in May 2023, following their acquisition from another Section 311 operator, but did not file an SOC with FERC until April 2025. The order ties the penalty to the approximately two-year delay between commencement of the Section 311 service and the SOC filing date. The pipeline operator was also ordered to provide an annual compliance report and to abide by additional verification requirements related to the filing of its FERC Form No. 549D, the Quarterly Transportation & Storage Report for Intrastate Natural Gas and Hinshaw Pipelines.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

August 6, 2025

In Sierra Club v. FERC, No. 24-1199 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 1, 2025), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) upheld the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) approval of a 1,000-foot natural gas pipeline segment crossing the United States-Mexico border (the Border Pipeline) under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), rejecting environmental groups’ challenges that FERC improperly limited its analysis under both the NGA and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as related to a 155-mile intrastate “Connector Pipeline” constructed upstream of the Border Pipeline in Texas.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 17, 2025

On July 15, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) issued an order1 proposing to eliminate the soft price cap of $1,000 per megawatt-hour (MWh) for bilateral spot sales in the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) that was implemented following the California energy crisis. If adopted, the Commission’s proposal would eliminate the requirement that sellers make a filing with FERC cost justifying spot market sales in excess of the soft price cap, which have become increasingly common in recent years as market conditions have continued to tighten throughout the West. Eliminating the WECC soft price cap would provide sellers that make sales during periods when prices exceed the cap greater certainty that their sales will not be second guessed after the fact.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 25, 2025

On June 4–5, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) hosted a commissioner-led technical conference to discuss resource adequacy challenges facing regional transmission organizations and independent system operators (RTO). The conference is a response to the growing concern that multiple RTO regions across the country may not have sufficient supply available in the coming years to meet demand due to resource retirements, the pace of new generation entry and higher load growth arising from the construction of data centers and reindustrialization.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 12, 2025

We are pleased to share the presentation slide deck and a recording of Akin’s recently presented webinar, “Navigating U.S. Policy Shifts in the Critical Minerals Sector.”

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 10, 2025

On June 4, 2025, the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) announced revisions to its procedures for pipeline safety enforcement actions. The changes, outlined in two new policy memoranda from PHMSA’s Office of the Chief Counsel (PHC), aim to enhance due process protections for pipeline operators by clarifying how civil penalties are calculated and expanding the disclosure of agency records in enforcement proceedings.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

May 22, 2025

On May 19, 2025, the Department of Energy (DOE) finalized its 2024 LNG Export Study: Energy, Economic and Environmental Assessment of U.S. LNG Exports (the 2024 Study) through the release of a Response to Comments on the 2024 Study. The Response to Comments concludes that the 2024 Study, as augmented through public comments submitted on or before March 20, 2025, supporting a finding that liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports serve the public interest. With the comment process complete, DOE will move forward with final orders on pending applications to export LNG to non-free trade agreement (non-FTA) countries.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

May 20, 2025

On Thursday, May 15, the Senate Commerce, Science & Transportation Subcommittee on Surface Transportation, Freight, Pipelines and Safety held a hearing titled, “Pipeline Safety Reauthorization: Ensuring the Safe and Efficient Movement of American Energy.” The hearing examined legislative priorities for reauthorizing the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA).

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.