Sanctions Relief to Expect from the Nuclear Deal with Iran

Jul 15, 2015

Reading Time : 5 min

Below is a more detailed discussion of what to expect in the immediate term, the timing of sanctions relief, the types of sanctions that will be lifted, and the resulting impact on U.S., and non-U.S. parties, of dealing with Iran.

What to Expect in the Immediate Term

Within five days, President Obama is expected to submit the agreement to Congress, which will have 60 days to review and vote on a joint resolution of approval or disapproval. GOP leaders have stated that they will strongly oppose any nuclear agreement, because it does not take sufficient steps to curb the Iranian nuclear threat. At this point, the extent of Democratic support for the agreement is unclear. In any event, since the President has vowed to veto any legislation to block the nuclear agreement, Congress would need to garner a two-thirds majority to override a presidential veto and enact such legislation.

The United States is also expected to submit a draft UNSC resolution on behalf of the P5+1 and the EU. That may not occur until the Congressional review process is concluded. The UNSC resolution will endorse the JCPOA and replace all existing UNSC sanctions with the new restrictions contained in the agreement. Opposition in the UNSC—where the five veto-holding members are all JCPOA participants—is considered unlikely.

The JCPOA will come into effect 90 days after the UNSC adopts the resolution (“Adoption Day”). At that point, the IAEA can start its verification of Iran’s implementation of its nuclear-related commitments. Consequently, U.N. economic and financial sanctions will be terminated at once under this resolution, but not until “Implementation Day” (i.e., the date on which the IAEA verifies that Iran has implemented several nuclear commitments under the agreement).

Timing of Sanctions Relief

With the exception of continuing the terms of the Joint Plan of Action, which has been in place since November 24, 2013, the agreement does not grant any immediate sanctions relief under the U.S., EU or U.N. regimes. All of the U.N., U.S. and EU sanctions relief outlined in the JCPOA will happen “simultaneously” on Implementation Day. Conditional on IAEA verification of Iran’s nuclear commitments, President Obama will issue presidential waivers suspending those U. S. economic and financial sanctions outlined below. The EU will also take similar, but broader measures, at that time. Although the parties are aiming to achieve this by the end of the year, the timing remains unclear. Moreover, the sanctions relief is subject to “snap-back” in the event of significant non-performance by Iran of its commitments. 

“Nuclear-Related” Sanctions

Upon IAEA verification, the U.S. and EU will lift their “nuclear-related” sanctions against Iran. The agreement provides the complete list of U.S. and EU nuclear-related sanctions and restrictive measures that will be lifted. This list includes most EU sanctions against Iran. From the U.S. perspective, the sanctions to be eased are largely those “directed at non-U.S. persons.” Consequently, U.S. persons, including non-U.S. branches of U.S. companies and non-U.S. entities (e.g., subsidiaries, affiliates, joint ventures) owned or controlled by U.S. persons, will continue to be generally prohibited from conducting most transactions involving Iran without a license.

U.S. Sanctions Relief for Non-U.S. Firms

Consistent with the above, upon Implementation Day, the United States will suspend secondary sanctions that penalize non-U.S. entities and individuals who engage in certain activities with Iran. The relief particularly affects the following industries that are subject to U.S. secondary sanctions: finance/banking; insurance; energy; petrochemical; shipping, shipbuilding, and ports; gold and other precious metals; certain software and metals; and automotive. The United States will also remove sanctions targeted at certain designated individuals and entities, which will result in the release of frozen funds.

Of particular importance, non-U.S. financial institutions will be able to engage in transactions with, or involving, the Central Bank of Iran and Iranian financial institutions not on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN) List. The agreement also drops sanctions that prohibit transactions in the Iranian Rial or provide U.S. banknotes to the Iranian government.

Non-U.S. companies must bear in mind that U.S. persons, and entities owned or controlled by U.S. persons, will remain subject to stringent restrictions on direct or indirect dealings, with or involving, Iran. As such, transactions involving Iran should be rigorously scrutinized to ensure no U.S.-person involvement, including U.S. national employees or U.S. correspondent banks that may be processing U.S. dollar transactions.

U.S. Sanctions Relief for U.S. Firms

Most restrictions on U.S. individuals and entities will remain in effect, with few exceptions. One such exception is that the United States has agreed to license non-U.S. entities owned or controlled by a U.S. person to engage in activities with Iran that are consistent with the JCPOA. This presents potential opportunities for non-U.S. subsidiaries and affiliates of U.S. multinational corporations to, under certain conditions, engage in transactions in which their non-U.S. competitors are engaging.

The United States will also allow licensed sales by U.S. persons of commercial passenger aircraft and related parts and services to Iran, which presents a potentially significant business opportunity for U.S. aviation equipment companies to export equipment to Iran for use in civil aircraft. Licensed activities will need to include appropriate safeguards to ensure that the licensed aircraft, goods or services are not resold or retransferred to any person or entity on the SDN List. The agreement also allows for the licensing of imports to the United States of Iranian-origin carpets and foodstuff, including pistachios and caviar.

EU Sanctions Relief

The EU has agreed to lift sanctions affecting Iran’s finance and insurance; oil and gas; and transportation sectors, among others. Unlike the United States, which is initially only suspending its sanctions, the EU is terminating these sanctions, in addition to unfreezing Iranian assets belonging to Iranian financial institutions, individuals and other organizations.

For financial institutions, the EU measures broadly lift “all sanctions” related to “banking activities, including the establishment of new correspondent banking relationships and the opening of new branches and subsidiaries of Iranian banks in the territories of EU Member States.”

Conclusion

In sum, the JCPOA does not immediately lift sanctions against Iran. Certain steps need to be completed before any relief will be implemented, including a political process within the United States, a UNSC resolution, various nuclear-related measures by Iran and verification by the IAEA.

Once these steps have taken place, most U.N. and EU sanctions against Iran will be lifted. While U.S. sanctions will be eased in their application to non-U.S. companies, these sanctions will continue to apply to U.S. persons, including entities owned or controlled by U.S. persons. Consequently, significant compliance risk will continue to apply with respect to transactions involving Iran.

In light of the above, U.S. and non-U.S. companies must closely analyze potential opportunities involving Iran to assess the compliance risk associated with the transaction, identify whether restrictions may apply, and determine whether licensing may be available. 

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

November 6, 2025

The market for the direct procurement of energy by commercial and industrial buyers has been active in the U.S. for a decade.  In years past, buyers often engaged in such purchases on a voluntary basis to achieve their goals to use renewable energy.  These days, C&I buyers are turning to direct procurement or self-supply to obtain a reliable source of energy.  Sufficient and accessible energy from a local utility may not be available or may be materially delayed or trigger significant capital costs.  This is a material change driven in part by increased demand for electricity, including demand from data centers, EV infrastructure and industrial development.       

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 27, 2025

On October 23, 2025, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) directed the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to conduct a rulemaking to assert jurisdiction over load interconnections to the bulk electric transmission system and establish standardized procedures for the interconnection of large loads.1 The Directive included an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (ANOPR) that sets forth the legal justification for asserting jurisdiction over transmission-level load interconnections and fourteen principles that should inform FERC’s rulemaking process. The Secretary has directed FERC to take “final action” on the Directive no later than April 30, 2026.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 24, 2025

On October 21, 2025, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a final order (DOE/FECM Order No. 5264-A1) granting Venture Global CP2 LNG, LLC long-term authorization to export up to 1,446 billion cubic feet per year of domestically produced liquefied natural gas (LNG) from its Louisiana facility to countries without a free trade agreement with the United States (Non-FTA Countries). The final order follows a March 2025 Conditional Order,2 which issued while DOE was still completing its review of the agency’s 2024 LNG Export Study.3 The final order confirms that the project’s export volume and term authorization (through December 31, 2050) are unchanged, but provides for a three-year “make-up period” to allow export of any approved volume not shipped during the original term.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 9, 2025

On October 1, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued Order No. 914 amending certain Commission regulations to incorporate a conditional sunset date in compliance with the Trump administration’s April 2025 Executive Order, “Zero-Based Regulatory Budgeting to Unleash American Energy” (the EO).

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 8, 2025

Akin is pleased to serve as a gold sponsor for Infocast’s Energy Independence Summit in Houston, October 21-23. Energy partner Charlie Ofner will moderate the Macroeconomics of Domestic Energy Independence panel, projects & energy transition partner Shariff Barakat will lead Opportunities in US Manufacturing: How Big, How Fast, How FEOC?, and counsel Taha Qureshi will guide the discussion on Cornerstones for Energy Independence: Investing in Grid Security & Cybersecurity.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 6, 2025

As of October 6, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) continues to operate despite the lapse in appropriations that resulted in a government shutdown on October 1, 2025. While FERC receives appropriations from Congress, it primarily is self-funded through fees and charges obtained from the industries it regulates, offsetting its total costs. Hence, during prior government shutdowns in 2018 and 2013, the agency was able to continue operations. However, FERC published a plan for operating in the event of a lapse in appropriations on September 30, 2025, available here

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

September 8, 2025

On September 4, 2025, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee convened a hearing to consider the nominations of Laura Swett and David LaCerte to serve as commissioners at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission). Swett is a former FERC Staff that served as legal and policy advisor to former FERC Chairman Kevin McIntyre and Commission Bernard McNamee. LaCerte is an attorney in private practice that previously held positions at the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board and the Louisiana Department of Veterans Affairs.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

September 9, 2025

On August 29, 2025, Christopher Wright, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) submitted a proposal to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) under section 403 of the Department of Energy Organization Act (DOE Organization Act), asking that FERC terminate its long-running proceeding in Docket No. PL18-1, which addresses proposed updates to its policy statement on the Certification of New Interstate Natural Gas Facilities. The docket resulted in a draft policy statement that has never been finalized, nor relied upon by FERC in a published order, but would require FERC to consider environmental impacts and potential mitigation prior to making a public interest determination under the Natural Gas Act (NGA). The Secretary asks FERC to rescind the draft policy statement in its entirety to remove any uncertainty in gas infrastructure development. Rescission would require FERC to initiate a new docket and develop a new record should it want to reinitiate similar policy changes in the future.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.