Senators Introduce Competing Proposals Relating to Natural Gas Exports

Mar 14, 2014

Reading Time : 3 min

Senator Markey Proposes To Halt New Exports to Countries that do Not Have a Free Trade Agreement with the U.S. for up to Two years – Or Longer

Senator Markey issued a press release indicating that he opposes efforts to expedite new natural gas exports.  Senator Markey believes that the U.S. should put diplomatic pressure on Russia, but not at the expense of America’s manufacturers and consumers.  Senator Markey is concerned that additional exports could result in spikes in natural gas prices which could cost American consumers and businesses $62 billion per year.

Senator Markey’s bill, S. 2088 , called the “American Natural Gas Security and Consumer Protection Act,” would amend the NGA to require that before any additional exports of gas may be authorized to countries that do not have a free trade agreement with the U.S., the Secretary of Energy must issue new regulations for determining whether an export of natural gas is in the public interest.  The bill would require the Secretary to issue final regulations within two years of enactment of the proposed legislation.

The new regulations would require the Secretary to make a determination as to whether each proposed export is in the public interest through:

  • Use of the latest available data on current and projected U.S. gas demand, production, and price;
  • Consideration of the effects of the proposed export on:  household and business energy expenditures; the U.S. economy, jobs, and manufacturing; the energy security of the U.S.; the conservation of domestic natural gas supplies to meet future energy needs of the U.S.; the potential for natural gas use in transportation, industrial, and electricity sectors of the U.S.; the ability of the U.S. to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; the national security and foreign policy of the U.S.; domestic natural gas supply and availability; the balance of trade; other issues determined to be relevant; and
  • Consideration of a detailed statement, to be issued by the Secretary under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, of the environmental impact of the issuance of exportation orders, which must include an analysis of the impacts of gas production on the environment in communities where the gas to be exported is produced.

Impact of the Proposed Legislation

Neither bill would change the approval process for exports destined for countries with which the U.S. has a free trade agreement requiring national treatment for trade in natural gas.  Such exports still would be deemed to be consistent with the public interest, and granted without modification or delay.  However, both bills would dramatically change the current method of evaluating exports to non-free trade countries.  Currently, the NGA requires approval of such proposed exports unless the Secretary finds the exportation is not in the national interest.  Under Senator Markey’s proposal, this presumption in favor of exports is would be removed.  Instead, the Secretary would have to make an affirmative finding that an export to a non-free trade country is in the national interest before the export application could be approved.  The new regulations would require the Secretary to undertake a detailed analysis of each export application, based on consideration of a number of economic, environmental, and national security factors.  At best, this would mean significant delays in obtaining future export authorizations to non-free trade nations.  Senator Begich’s proposal, on the other hand, would preserve the presumption in favor of exports, and it would expedite the approval process for some countries that do not have a free-trade agreement with the U.S.


1 Gas that is exported solely to meet a requirement imposed under certain legislation dealing with emergency situations would be exempted from the requirements of Senator Markey’s bill.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

March 10, 2026

Federal energy regulators are assuming expanded roles as the administration prioritizes energy dominance and infrastructure development to meet unprecedented power demand. FERC Chairman Laura Swett has vowed to expedite data center interconnections while addressing jurisdictional challenges, warning that unmet electricity demand could drive data centers abroad and create national security risks. The agency is processing pipeline applications faster than in prior years and considering blanket authorizations for certain LNG and hydroelectric projects to streamline approvals. 

Pipeline projects previously stalled by Clean Water Act permits are being revitalized, particularly in northeastern states where historically high electricity prices have increased openness to natural gas infrastructure. The Department of Energy is expanding its emergency authority to require retention of generation resources and has granted major LNG export approvals, signaling commitment to expanding U.S. export capacity under a streamlined framework that deprioritizes climate considerations.  

The Administration is bullish on the opportunities for the U.S. energy industry in Venezuela and eager to support companies willing to navigate the political risk inherent in the operations at the moment. Early meetings with President Trump and industry leaders showed the path forward may be longer and more complex than anticipated by the President. 

As permitting reforms advance and the pendulum swings toward fossil fuel favorability, the regulatory and policy landscape is fundamentally reshaping energy infrastructure development timelines and investment opportunities. 

Oil & Gas in 2026: Energy Policy & Regulation 

Delve into the complete regulatory & policy outlook at our Oil & Gas in 2026 report.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

March 3, 2026

Macroeconomic turbulence and volatile commodity markets significantly influenced oil & gas M&A activity throughout 2025, with deals showing renewed momentum only in the year's second half.  

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 24, 2026

On February 19, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued an order rescinding the soft price cap for bilateral spot market energy sales in the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) region.1 As previously covered, on July 15, 2025, FERC initiated a Federal Power Act Section 206 proceeding following the D.C. Circuit’s decision finding that FERC must apply the Mobile-Sierra public interest standard before ordering refunds for above-cap bilateral sales and vacating FERC’s orders requiring refunds for certain bilateral spot market transactions in the WECC region that exceeded the $1,000 MWh soft price cap.2 FERC’s Order follows through on the proposal it made last July to eliminate the WECCs soft price cap and marks a recognition that Western wholesale markets have evolved over the past two decades to become sufficiently competitive to render the soft price cap unnecessary.  

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 23, 2026

The oil & gas industry is experiencing a fundamental transformation in how companies access and deploy capital in 2026. Despite strong balance sheets and robust free cash flow generation, the sector is witnessing strategic shifts in funding sources and investment priorities that signal a new era of capital allocation.

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.