The Yield Created by the Yieldco

Aug 26, 2014

Reading Time : 3 min

Some of the more significant Yieldco activity, in reverse order of funding dates, include:

  1. SunEdison, on July 18, 2014, spun off 524 MW of solar project assets in the U.S., Canada, the U.K. and Chile to form TerraForm Power, in an IPO that raised $501.6 million and saw its IPO price surge about 35 percent in its first day of trading. Based on the anticipated initial distribution, as described in its S-1 filing, at its initial offering price TerraForm was to provide a yield of about 3.7 percent. However, due to the buying frenzy for the security, the yield was down closer to 2.6 percent by the end of its first day of trading. 
  2. Abengoa Yield, was spun off from Abengoa on June 18, 2014 with 10 assets, including solar projects in Arizona, California and Spain, and a wind farm in Uruguay.  It also includes conventional power in Mexico. It too, saw a strong demand at its initial public offering, with shares being bid up 28 percent on their first day of trading. As of August 22, Abengoa Yield is trading up about 38 percent over its IPO price with a 2.9 percent yield, but many expect that to increase next year when its Mojave power plant in Southern California goes operational.
  3. On July 2, 2014, NextEra Energy Partners closed its initial public offering, raising $442.7 million net proceeds, with 10 projects representing 990 MW of renewable capacity.  NextEra Energy Partners also saw its shares increase by 28 percent on the day of its IPO launch. It has since dropped slightly below those levels but still current yield is a very skinny 2.2 percent, as projected based on the distribution for the first year as described in its S-1.
  4. NRG Yield Inc., which allowed NRG to raise $471 million last July by selling a 34.5 percent interest in 1,324 MW of conventional and solar power plants, 1098 MW of thermal facilities and 123 MW of small cogeneration. The yield initially went out at 5.45 percent, but it currently trades with a 2.73 percent yield. NRG Yield is one of only a few Yieldcos that is comprised of both renewable and conventional assets, which may explain it very low yield. NRG Yield Inc. also completed its acquisition of the Alta Wind facility in Tehachapi, CA from Terra-Gen on August 12, adding an additional 947 MW of operating wind capacity to its portfolio.
  5. Transalta Renewables, allowed Canada’s Transalta Corporation to raise $202 million Canadian in August of last year by selling a 19.3 percent interest in 1,112 MW of wind and hydro projects. It initially yielded about 7.5 percent, but that yield stands at about 6.50 percent currently.
  6. Pattern Energy spun off 1,041 MW of wind farms in the U.S. Canada and Chile and was able to raise $318.6 million this past September by selling a 36.8 percent share of the company formed to hold the assets, which included 6 operating wind farms and two wind farms under construction. Pattern’s Yieldco initially yielded 6.25 percent, but is recently trading with a 4.2 percent yield.

Some companies have formed vehicles that are “yieldco-like”, although not formally yieldcos. Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. converted itself into a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) in April of 2013 and is currently offering a yield of 6.4 percent. Solar City went the route of a securitization of debt secured by revenues from solar PPAs and leases from rooftop solar.

In addition, it is noteworthy that a number of other significant players in the solar industry have also publically announced that they are considering forming Yieldcos. These include SunPower, First Solar, Canadian Solar and several others.

So, why the rush to Yieldcos?  In next week’s post, we will discuss the many benefits that a Yieldco brings to the parent company.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

April 15, 2025

On April 9, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order (EO)1 directing several federal agencies and subagencies that regulate energy, environmental, and conservation matters,2 including the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the Department of Energy (DOE), to establish conditional sunset dates for “regulations governing energy production.” The stated objective of the EO is to require agencies to periodically reexamine their regulations to ensure that they continue to serve the public good. For FERC, the order covers regulations promulgated under the Federal Power Act (FPA), the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act (FUA)3, as amended, while DOE must consider regulations promulgated under the Atomic Energy Act (AEA), the National Appliance Energy Conservation Act, the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct 1992), the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005) and the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), as amended (collectively the Covered Regulations).4 To the extent the DOE has been directed to promulgate regulations under various sections of the NGA, FPA and FUA, and FERC has been directed to promulgate regulations specific to the statutes attributed to the DOE in the EO, the EO is silent. The EO expressly does not apply to those “regulatory permitting regimes authorized by statute.”5

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

April 10, 2025

On April 8, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order (EO) directing the Department of Energy (DOE) to take steps to expand the use of its emergency authority under Federal Power Act (FPA) Section 202(c) to require the retention of generation resources deemed necessary to maintain resource adequacy within at risk-regions of the bulk power system regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).1 The EO appears to envision a more active role for DOE in overseeing and supporting the resource adequacy of the grid that deviates from the historic use of Section 202(c) and touches on issues at the intersection of state and federal authority over resource planning.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

March 10, 2025

On March 5, 2025, the United States Department of Energy (DOE) approved Golden Pass LNG Terminal LLC’s (GPLNG) request to extend a deadline to begin exporting liquefied natural gas (LNG) from its terminal facility currently under construction in Sabine Pass, Texas for 18 months, from September 30, 2025, to March 31, 2027 (the Order). The Order amends GPLNG’s two existing long-term orders authorizing the export of domestically produced LNG to countries with which the United States does and does not have free trade agreements (FTA).1  The Order does not amend the authorizations’ end date, which remains December 31, 2050. Under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), the DOE may authorize exports to non-FTA countries following completion of a “public interest” review, whereas exports to FTA countries are deemed to be in the public interest and the DOE is directed to issue authorizations without modification or delay.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

March 4, 2025

Join projects & energy transition partner Shariff Barakat at Infocast’s Solar & Wind, where he will moderate the “Tax Equity Market Dynamics” panel.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 13, 2025

Oil & gas companies continue to identify and capitalize on opportunities related to the deployment of new energy technologies, with their approaches broadly maturing and coalescing around maximizing synergies, leveraging available subsidies and responding to regulatory drivers.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 11, 2025

On January 30, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) approved a Stipulation and Consent Agreement (Agreement) between the Office of Enforcement (OE) and Stronghold Digital Mining Inc. (Stronghold) resolving an investigation into whether Stronghold had violated the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) tariff and Commission regulations by limiting the quantity of energy made available to the market to serve a co-located Bitcoin mining operation.1 This order appears to be the first instance of a public enforcement action involving co-located load and generation and comes at a time when both FERC and market operators2 are scrutinizing the treatment of co-located load due to the rapid increase in demand associated with data center development.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 5, 2025

2024 was about post-consolidation deal flow and a steady uptick in activity across the oil & gas market. This year, mergers & acquisitions (M&A) activity looks set to take on a different tone as major consolidation plays bed down.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

January 30, 2025

The oil & gas industry is experiencing a capital resurgence, driven by stabilizing interest rates and renewed attention from institutional investors. Private equity is leading the charge with private credit filling the void in traditional energy finance and hybrid capital instruments gaining in popularity. Family offices are also playing a crucial role, providing long-term, flexible investments.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.