U.S. Department of Commerce Places Severe Export Restrictions on Russian Deepwater Oil and Gas Field

Aug 7, 2015

Reading Time : 1 min

This prohibition means that foreign persons, as well as U.S. persons, must apply for a license from BIS to export any of the following items to the Yuzhno-Kirinskoye Field: U.S.-origin items (wherever located), certain foreign-origin items incorporating more than a de minimis amount of U.S. content or that are the direct product of certain U.S. technology or software, and items located in or moving intransit through the United States.

According to the final rule released by BIS,“[t]he Yuzhno-Kirinskoye Field is being added to the Entity List because it is reported to contain substantial reserves of oil.” In particular, the U.S. government determined that “exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) of all items subject to the EAR” to the oil field present “an unacceptable risk of use in, or diversion to” deepwater (greater than 500 feet) oil and gas exploration or production activities in Russia—activities that are targeted by sectoral sanctions maintained by BIS and the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) directed at Russia’s energy sector. Importantly, unlike other sanctions targeting Russia’s energy sector, the restrictions on the Yuzhno-Kirinskoye Field apply to all transactions involving items subject to the EAR, not just when the exporter knows or is unable to determine that the items will be used for deepwater, Arctic offshore or shale projects.

This latest action by BIS highlights the importance of screening all transactions involving Russia and Crimea to ensure that they do not involve restricted locations, end-users, end-uses or restricted persons. Furthermore, companies should expect that any exports of sensitive items or technology to Russia, particularly those related to oil or gas exploration or production, will receive high scrutiny from the U.S. government to ensure that they do not violate sectoral sanctions targeting Russia’s energy sector.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

June 25, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to the California Independent System Operator Corporation (CAISO) directing CAISO and CAISO transmission owners to show cause as to why CAISO’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (California Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., 195 FERC ¶ 61,214 (2026) (the Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 24, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to New York Independent System Operator, Inc. (NYISO) directing NYISO and NYISO transmission owners to show cause as to why NYISO’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (New York Independent System Operator, Inc., 195 FERC ¶ 61,216 (2026) (Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 23, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. (MISO) directing MISO and MISO transmission owners to show cause as to why MISO’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., 195 FERC ¶ 61,212 (2026) (Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 23, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. directing PJM and PJM transmission owners to show cause as to why PJM’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 195 FERC ¶ 61,211 (2026) (the Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.