Developments in Emissions Trading in the U.K. and EU

Nov 16, 2021

Reading Time : 5 min

By: Kenneth J. Markowitz, Charles Edward Smith, Charlotte Ezaz (Trainee Solicitor)

Proposed changes to EU ETS

We have previously discussed the key elements of the European Union’s (EU) ambitious “Fit for 55” package in our blog post here, which aims to reduce EU net greenhouse gas emissions by 55 percent by 2030 as compared to 1990 levels.1

The EC launched the EU ETS in 2005 and many observers have recognized the system as a highly effective tool for decarbonization. Currently, the EU ETS is applicable to 40-45 percent of EU greenhouse gas emissions, including with respect to the energy, power and aviation sectors. The latest revision of the EU ETS Directive, adopted in 2018, aims to bring emissions allowances during 2021 through 2030 in line with the previous EU emission reduction target—i.e., a 43 percent reduction by 2030 relative to 1990 levels. The proposed revisions to the EU ETS, as part of the Fit for 55 package, go further and look to extend these reduction targets by an additional 18 percent (or an aggregate 61 percent reduction as compared with 1990 levels). The proposal seeks to bring forward achieving these additional reductions by no later than 2030 and intends to do so by increasing annual percentage reductions and applying emissions trading mechanisms to additional sectors as described below.

Maritime

The new proposals plan to gradually extend the applicability of the EU ETS to the maritime sector over the period of 2023-2025. The focus for reducing emissions will be placed on large ships (in excess of 5,000 gross tonnage) and will apply to 100 percent of all emissions generated from intra-EU traffic and 50 percent of emissions generated from extra-EU traffic (i.e., voyages that either start or end at an EU port and regardless of a ship’s flag). With the phase-in, shipping companies will be required to surrender 100 percent of their verified emissions as of 2026. There could be significant implications for ships failing to comply with these new measures, including denying entry to EU ports by noncompliant ships.

Aviation

The proposals also increase the impact of decarbonization measures in sectors already under the EU ETS, such as aviation, where free allowances will be phased out for intra-EU flights by 2026. In an attempt to address extra-EU flights made by EU-based airlines, the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA)—a UN scheme to ensure any international aviation emissions above 2019 levels are offset elsewhere—will be implemented in EU law through the EU ETS.

Road transport and buildings

The proposed revisions to the EU ETS go further to establish a new separate emissions trading system for emissions from fuels used in road transport and buildings, which will apply beginning in 2026.2 The administrative rules for the new system are expected to largely replicate the existing EU ETS, specifically in areas such as transfer, surrender, monitoring and reporting and penalties for noncompliance. The EU has not ruled out integrating the two emissions systems at some stage; however, representatives of the EU have expressed concerns about the potentially destabilizing impact that introducing these mechanisms to road transport and buildings may have on the existing EU ETS, at least initially.

This new system will focus on upstream fuel suppliers, putting the responsibility on fuel producers and suppliers to comply with the system, in accordance with the EC’s efforts to prevent individual households or road transport users from having direct obligations under the emissions scheme. Nonetheless, it is likely that consumers (including economically insecure consumers) will be hit with increased prices as a result of the proposals. The proposals contemplate that the compliance obligation would be triggered on the release into the market of fuels for consumption which are used to heat buildings and road transport sectors and which have an emissions factor.

The EC proposals consider the issue of double counting, but place responsibility on the regulated entities to determine whether the obligation is triggered based on end users of fuels (and the sectors in which the fuels are being used). The total quantity of allowances allocated for auction within the new system will be established in 2026. Nevertheless, it is not currently expected for free allowances to be allocated as part of the new system, as the EC determines the risk of carbon leakage in these sectors to be very low.

The EC recognizes that these areas have been challenging to decarbonize, but is quick to emphasize that the potential for innovation in this area is high. The EC, in particular, is hopeful that the new scheme will increase incentives to supply cleaner fuels for existing vehicles and speed up decarbonization. Whilst the EC has sought to address the social impacts from rising prices of fuels and heating bills through a Social Climate Fund, and has plans to incentivize and support the switch to lower-emission alternatives through a variety of approaches, it remains to be seen whether these governmental programs can provide sufficient financial support to low-income households to cover the cost of increasing energy prices and to enable the transition to lower emission alternatives for transport and heating.

Proposed changes to the U.K. ETS – The U.K. Government’s Net Zero Strategy

As discussed in our blog post here, the U.K. imposed the U.K. ETS earlier this year to replace the EU ETS as a result of the U.K.’s exit from the EU ETS as part of Brexit.

Currently, the U.K. ETS mirrors the EU ETS, but caps emissions at 5 percent below the U.K.’s notional share of the EU ETS cap for Phase IV of the EU ETS (2021-2030). As part of the NZS, the U.K. government announced that it will consult later this year on a net zero consistent cap, such that the cap will be aligned with a net zero consistent trajectory by January 2023, or January 2024 at the latest. The U.K. government has also expressed its intent in the NZS to review the allocation of free allowances while balancing the risk of carbon leakage to ensure that free allowances are allocated in a targeted manner while preserving the incentive to decarbonize for those industries.

As part of the NZS, the U.K. government proposes to extend the existing U.K. ETS and will consult in due course on extending the U.K. ETS to the two-thirds of emissions that are currently not included in the scheme—one would assume that road transport and heating will be high on the list of sectors to be subject to such expansion.

Finally, the NZS emphasizes the importance of engineered and nature-based greenhouse gas removals (GGRs) for achieving the U.K.’s net zero ambitions—in fact, it establishes that the U.K. currently will not meet its net zero target by 2050 without GGRs. The NZS commits to consider how the U.K. ETS could be utilized as a potential market-based solution for stimulating investment in GGRs where GGRs could represent negative emissions within an emissions trading system and this could offer a long-term market solution to support GGRs.

It is clear that both the U.K. and the EU intend to continue to utilize emissions trading as an effective tool to stimulate private investment and incentivize decarbonization across a growing range of sectors in the economy to meet its aggressive NDC—it remains to be seen whether this can be replicated on the world stage.


1 Target is part of the European Climate law, adopted 9 July 2021.

2 The existing EU ETS already covers some emissions from buildings predominantly through electricity used for heating.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Sustainability

February 19, 2025

Wind energy projects along the coasts are facing uncertainty due to President Trump’s Presidential Memorandum1 issued on January 20, “Temporary Withdrawal of All Areas on the Outer Continental Shelf from Offshore Wind Leasing and Review of the Federal Government’s Leasing and Permitting Practices for Wind Projects.” This Memorandum introduces substantial policy changes that impact both onshore and offshore wind development.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

January 24, 2025

Beginning on Monday, there have been a flurry of executive orders from the Trump administration reversing Biden-era energy policies, emphasizing oil and gas production, lifting the liquified natural gas (LNG) export permitting pause and withdrawing from all accords and commitments under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) including the Paris climate agreement. The orders also target electric vehicles (EVs), wind energy, international climate aid and the use of the social cost of carbon in agency decision making. For close tracking of these orders and more to come, visit the Akin Trump Executive Order tracker. Concurrently, President Trump’s nominees for the Department of the Interior (DOI), Department of Energy (DOE) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have each passed their initial rounds of committee confirmation votes, and now await votes before the Senate floor.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

January 10, 2025

In the final days of his term, President Joe Biden has taken significant steps to solidify his administration’s climate legacy. The administration finalized rules for various clean energy tax credits established under the Inflation Reduction Act. However, these rules, intended to stimulate clean energy advancements through 2032, face opposition from Congressional Republicans, who are considering scaling back or repealing the credits through budget reconciliation.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

December 19, 2024

The twilight hours of the Biden administration and the 118th Congress have been marked by intense legislative and regulatory activity, underscored by President-elect Trump’s derailment of last-minute congressional budget talks, and stalled progress on energy permitting reforms.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

December 11, 2024

The Biden administration’s environmental policies and the future of infrastructure projects are facing pivotal legal challenges and political shifts. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit questioned the viability of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) 2024 power plant emissions rule, particularly its reliance on carbon capture technology, while the 6th Circuit overturned the EPA’s rejection of Kentucky’s smog plan, which comes only three days after the EPA issued its defense of its “good neighbor” smog control plan responding to the Supreme Court’s decision to halt its implementation in June. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court’s handling of the first National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) case in some time, Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, could substantially alter the scope of environmental reviews, with potential immediate implications for the oil & gas industry. These judicial reviews may be influenced by a potential change in administration and Congress, as Trump-era officials, including Vivek Ramaswamy, advocate for scaling back NEPA regulations to expedite infrastructure projects. Additionally, the Department of Energy’s recent clarity on liquified natural gas (LNG) export authorizations underscores the broader tension between expanding fossil fuel infrastructure and adhering to environmental regulations amidst a polarized political and legal landscape.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

October 3, 2024

NYC Climate Week included over 900 events with an estimated 100,000 participants swarming the City. While indicative of growing interest in climate action, some note that the record turnout foreshadows a smaller presence at COP 29 in Azerbaijan.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

September 19, 2024

Recent legislative and regulatory developments reflect ongoing tensions between environmental policies and economic priorities in the U.S. energy landscape. The House Energy and Commerce Committee’s advancement of three resolutions targeting Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rules on power plants, vehicle emissions and air quality standards marks a broader Republican effort to counter President Biden’s environmental agenda, though these resolutions face likely vetoes. In contrast, House Speaker Mike Johnson has signaled openness to retaining certain green energy tax credits, reflecting a pragmatic approach as some Republican districts benefit from these investments. Simultaneously, bipartisan efforts to boost critical mineral production, led by Senators Hickenlooper and Tillis, aim to reduce U.S. reliance on Chinese imports, while the White House has raised tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles and solar products, a move seen as both protective of domestic industries and potentially disruptive to supply chains. Legal battles continue, as seen in the judicial blocking of the Interior Department’s methane rule in five states and ongoing litigation over EPA’s cross-state pollution rule, which the agency has been allowed to revise. Meanwhile, grid operators have expressed concerns that the EPA’s carbon emissions rule could threaten power plant operations, pushing for legal revisions to protect grid reliability. Together, these developments reflect the broader debate over balancing environmental regulations with economic and energy security concerns.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

September 12, 2024

After a recent permitting reform bill was passed out of a Senate Committee, House Republicans took steps to draft their own permitting reform legislation. Rep. Westerman (R- AR) held a hearing to discuss his draft bill, which most notably places limitations on the environmental permitting process for energy projects. This comes as both parties position energy policy as a key election issue, with Vice President Harris recognizing a role for oil and gas production during the Presidential debate in response to Republican criticism of her climate policies. Meanwhile, former President Trump vowed to pull back unspent dollars approved for greenhouse gas reduction and energy transition projects under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The IRA has already spurred significant renewable energy investment, particularly in rural electric co-ops using the funds to replace coal generation with clean energy and battery storage.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.