Trick or Treat? Full Text of Comprehensive Tax Reform Legislation Could Drop the Week of Halloween

October 21, 2017

By Stuart E. Leblang, G. Hunter Bates, Geoffrey K. Verhoff,  Amy S. Elliott, and Ryan Ellis

Investors and traders carefully following the prospects of tax reform will not have to wait long to see details of the many tax law changes that could impact their investments and trading positions. One of the last amendments that the Senate adopted on October 19, 2017, (no. 1561 1 ) could speed up consideration of tax reform legislation by more than 2 weeks, potentially obviating the need for a conference committee by amending the House-passed budget resolution to bring the two chambers in agreement on the outlines for a tax reform bill. 2 Assuming the House votes in favor of the changes, the agreed-upon outline calls for a net tax cut of as much as $1.5 trillion during the first 10 years. The tax reform package is likely to be a combination of permanent tax cuts for provisions that are fully offset and temporary tax cuts (through 2028) for provisions that are not offset.

While large and numerous hurdles stand in the way of enactment of tax reform by the end of 2017, recent developments have opened up a small, but not insignificant, possibility that a tax bill could move more quickly than previously anticipated. What is theoretically possible?

 

Best-Case Timeline for Fast-Track Enactment of Tax Reform, Assuming No Hold Ups

Week of Oct. 23

House votes in favor of Senate changes to tax outline in budget resolution

Week of Oct. 30

House Ways and Means Committee releases text of tax reform bill

Week of Nov. 6

House Ways and Means Committee marks up its tax reform bill

Week of Nov. 13

The full House votes on its tax reform bill; Senate Finance Committee could also begin marking up its tax reform conceptual language

Late-Nov. through Late-Dec.

The full Senate votes on its tax reform bill; House and Senate resolve their differences and each chamber votes on a compromise bill

By Dec. 31, 2017

President Donald J. Trump signs tax reform bill

 

The accelerated timeline means that, absent inevitable stumbling blocks, the House could vote on tax reform legislation by Thanksgiving. The Senate could pass its bill by the end of November, followed by negotiations between the two chambers over a compromise agreement (assuming their tax plans diverge, which is likely). There is at least a technical chance, albeit a slim one, that Congress could get tax reform passed by Christmas.

 

Unresolved Issues on Which the House Tax Bill and Senate Tax Bill Could Diverge

Corporate Integration

Senate Finance Chairman Orrin Hatch has been pushing for partial corporate integration, which would reduce the double-tax hit on corporate earnings by allowing corporations to deduct a portion of dividends paid to shareholders, whereas House leadership has not.

International Anti- Base Erosion Rules

Moving to a territorial system of international taxation will require new, strong anti-base erosion measures that could hit some U.S. multinationals harder than others. Details of a possible minimum tax on what amounts to income from intangibles and other protections to “level the field between U.S.-headquartered parent companies and foreign-headquartered parent companies” 3 remain a mystery.

Cost Recovery

House leadership is pushing for full expensing of business investments, at least for 5 years, whereas Senate leadership might be inclined to provide for more limited accelerated depreciation.

Interest Expense Limitations

Businesses expect that Congress will partially limit their ability to deduct the interest expense they pay on their debt, but some are advocating for carve-outs and favorable grandfathering rules.

Pass-through Rate Guardrails

Tax writers seem committed to providing a special 25 percent rate on the business income of pass-through entities, but it is still very much unclear how they intend to police the new rate to prevent abuse.

Top Individual Rate

The tax reform framework 4 contemplated a fourth tax bracket on the highest earners, and House Speaker Paul Ryan 5 indicated the idea is under consideration. Some Senate Republicans are fighting this urge. 6 

Capital and Investment Rate

Lawmakers have been mum on whether they would keep, limit or improve upon the preferential rate for certain investment income.

State and Local Tax (SALT) Deduction

House leadership wants to limit itemized deductions, including a possible full repeal of the SALT deduction, whereas Senate leadership might be more willing to allow for the deduction in some cases.

“Roth-ification” of Retirement Plans

House Republicans are reportedly considering drastically reducing caps on 401(k) accounts, pushing workers instead to invest their retirement savings in Roth accounts so that the tax is paid up-front. 7 

 

There are a few unique features of this tax reform reconciliation process that could facilitate quick enactment. First, because lawmakers ultimately decided to give only one committee in each chamber jurisdiction to write the legislation (the tax writing committees: Ways and Means in the House and Finance in the Senate), the bill can skip the budget committees and go straight from tax committee markup to full floor consideration. 8 

In addition, the Senate’s amended budget resolution would undercut the Senate’s Pay-As-You-Go (PAYGO) point of order by giving the Senate Budget Committee chairman the authority to “make adjustments to the pay-as-you-go ledger, for one or more bills [etc.] relating to changes in federal tax laws.” 9 

Lawmakers must realize the enormity of the challenge ahead of them. It is likely that the so-called Big Six tax writers are presenting this as a critical moment to their members: Either pass tax reform under this accelerated timeline by the end of 2017/early 2018 or the effort will fail.

Some view the parallel but different tracks pursued by the two chambers as doomed. With so little room for error, House and Senate Republicans will have great challenges passing their separate tax reform bills, let alone agree on a compromise solution. But Republicans seem to understand the urgency of a major accomplishment and are unified behind the goal of tax reform. These latest developments are an indication that tax reform is still possible and could happen sooner than most people realize.


[1] https://www.congress.gov/amendment/115th-congress/senate-amendment/1561/text

[2] https://www.rollcall.com/news/senate-moving-adopt-house-backed-budget-blueprint-changes/?utm_source=news-alert&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletters) and https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2017/10/19/republicans-have-the-budget-votes-they-need-but-democrats-prepare-to-make-it-painful/?utm_term=.a153401cb0f5

[3] https://www.dropbox.com/s/54v0d0i3ji1h0jr/Tax%20Blueprint.pdf?dl=0

[4] https://fairandsimple.gop/

[5] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-20/house-republicans-to-keep-higher-tax-rate-on-wealthy-ryan-says

[6] http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/10/04/exclusive-sen-rand-paul-cut-taxes-for-all/

[7] https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/20/us/politics/republicans-tax-401-k.html

[8] Lawmakers had previously included the natural resources committees to allow a provision that would open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling, but have now dropped that plan, thus speeding up the legislative process. (See Section 5113 of amendment no. 1561, which modifies Section 2002 in the substitute amendment.) This move streamlines the approval process, especially since the budget committees in both chambers generally contain more budget-conscious members.

[9] The Senate’s PAYGO point of order gives one senator the ability to strike any provision that would increase the deficit relative to current law (according to the ledger) at year 5 and year 10, unless 60 senators vote to waive the point of order. http://www.crfb.org/papers/fy-2018-senate-budget-and-budget-gimmicks

 

Share This Page

Deal Analytics

Timely analysis on the risks and opportunities of corporate events with a focus on tax, giving high-stakes decision-makers an edge.

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.