Clean Power Plan Litigation Update–Court Denies Stay, but Sets Expedited Schedule for Decision

Jan 25, 2016

Reading Time : 1 min

As we noted in earlier reports, numerous entities–including 27 states and a variety of industry and business groups–asked the D.C. Circuit to stay compliance with the Clean Power Plan pending judicial review. The stay requests argued, in part, that the compliance deadlines in the rule1, and the significant shifts in generation and new infrastructure required to meet the rule’s carbon emissions reduction requirements, were causing immediate irreparable harm, including the expenditure of state resources to begin crafting compliance plans and the early retirement of coal-fired generation.

The D.C. Circuit did not respond directly to these and other arguments raised in the stay requests, instead following its usual practice of issuing a short order, stating only that “Petitioners have not satisfied the stringent requirements for a stay pending court review.”

The court did, however, take the step of establishing an expedited scheduling for consideration of the merits of the various legal challenges to the Clean Power Plan. Under that schedule, briefing will move swiftly through the spring, and oral argument will be conducted on June 2, 2016. That expedited schedule could allow the court to issue its opinion before September 6, 2016, the initial deadline for states to submit a final compliance plan or a progress report and request for additional time to develop a final compliance plan.


1 Final state compliance plans or an initial compliance plan with a request for extension must be submitted to EPA by September 6, 2016, and all completed final compliance plans must be submitted by September 6, 2018.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

December 21, 2025

On December 19, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued its much-anticipated order on show cause proceeding concerning the co-location of generation and load within the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) market.[1] In the order, the Commission finds that PJM’s tariff is unjust and unreasonable because it does not provide sufficient clarity on the rates, terms, and conditions of service applicable to generators serving Co-Located Load and does not include transmission services appropriate for customers that are willing and able to limit their use of the transmission system in certain conditions. 

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

November 25, 2025

We are pleased to share the program materials and a recording of Akin’s recently presented webinar, “Navigating the Evolving Landscape of Corporate PPAs.”

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

November 12, 2025

On November 7, 2025, the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) reversed their prior positions and approved Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 401 Water Quality Certifications and other environmental permits for the Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Company’s (Transco) Northeast Supply Enhancement Project (NESE). NESE is a 25-mile natural gas pipeline expansion project certificated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) that is intended to deliver 400,000 dekatherms per day of natural gas produced in Pennsylvania to local distribution company customers in New York City through new facilities in Middlesex County, New Jersey and an underwater segment traversing the Raritan and Lower New York Bays.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

November 6, 2025

The market for the direct procurement of energy by commercial and industrial buyers has been active in the U.S. for a decade.  In years past, buyers often engaged in such purchases on a voluntary basis to achieve their goals to use renewable energy.  These days, C&I buyers are turning to direct procurement or self-supply to obtain a reliable source of energy.  Sufficient and accessible energy from a local utility may not be available or may be materially delayed or trigger significant capital costs.  This is a material change driven in part by increased demand for electricity, including demand from data centers, EV infrastructure and industrial development.       

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.