From Sea Change to Sea Levels Rising: What a Unified Democratic Government Means for Climate Change Action

Jan 7, 2021

Reading Time : 3 min

Still, any ambitious landmark climate change legislation will face a steep uphill battle in light of Democrats’ thinnest of  margins in both houses of Congress (particularly in the Senate).  Absent the elimination of the Senate filibuster or the use of budget reconciliation, comprehensive reform through a singular bill is unlikely.  Instead, Democrats may learn from their failed attempt to pass economy-wide cap-and-trade legislation through a unified Congress in 2009.  They may consider eschewing a single, major legislative proposal and, instead, embedding climate change provisions in myriad pieces of legislation to implement a comprehensive climate strategy in a more bottom-up approach.  We do not anticipate that in 2021 Congress passes the Green New Deal, a fracking ban, or a full repeal of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act to fund an ambitious environmental agenda.  Neither do we expect to see a climate-focused overhaul of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). 

Rather, this newly unified government—which will require the cooperation of the more moderate members from both parties—is likely to look to more politically palatable, incremental ways to accelerate the United States’ response to environmental and climate impacts with an economy still struggling from a global pandemic.  Given these constraints, we expect short-term legislative priorities of Congress and the President-elect to include infrastructure, transportation (especially motor vehicles), and energy efficiency as modest, but tangible, ways to refocus the Trump Administration’s nationalist, fossil-fuel-based approach through a more renewable, climate-friendly, environmentally just lens.  Lastly, Democrats may be reluctant to use the oft-discussed Congressional Review Act to overturn late-term Trump Administration rules due to the law’s prohibition on the promulgation of similar rules, and instead rely on the regulatory process to rescind or replace them with rules that include stronger climate protections.

A number of Democrats will encourage Leader Schumer and Speaker Pelosi to use the budget reconciliation process, but this would require some deft legislating to amend a rule to allow for consideration of legislation beyond mandatory spending and revenue measures.  If Democratic leaders decide to pursue the budget reconciliation process to move climate policy, and are successful in amending the rules, that legislation can be much more ambitious.  This special mechanism used to pass the Trump tax reforms, as well as the Bush tax cuts, allows for the Senate to pass legislation with a simple majority and prevents the use of the filibuster.  If Democrats decide to use the budget reconciliation process to pass climate legislation, the approach will still require approval from moderates such as Senators Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ), but Democrats may not need any Republicans to support the effort.

While the first 100 days of his presidency are unlikely to yield comprehensive legislative reforms, a Democratic Congress gives President-elect Biden more cover to take bolder steps to “Build Back Better.”  In the short term, the narrow Democratic majority in the Senate (when considering the tie-breaking vote of Vice President-elect Harris) means that Biden has a clear path toward the prompt confirmation of his nominees to lead executive branch agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency, Department of the Interior, Department of Energy, Council on Environmental Quality, and Department of Justice.  Following the confirmation of those agency heads, expect to see relatively quick action to achieve the more realistic components of his environmental agenda that do not require congressional authorization or appropriations.  These could include initiating the process to rescind and replace Trump-era rules related to methane and other greenhouse gas emissions from both stationary and mobile sources, scientific transparency in the rulemaking process, protected species, and NEPA implementation.

While there will be much optimism for an ambitious climate agenda under a newly unified government, Democrats will continue to be constrained by the narrow margins in the House and Senate.  Nonetheless, various Congressional rules changes or procedures are now available to them that could lead to more robust climate and environmental legislation.  President-elect Biden and Congressional leaders will need to decide if they are going to make climate change a priority that warrants the use of budget reconciliation or filibuster reform, or if they will rely on a more targeted strategy of winning smaller victories wherever feasible.

Share This Insight

Categories

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

April 15, 2025

On April 9, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order (EO)1 directing several federal agencies and subagencies that regulate energy, environmental, and conservation matters,2 including the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the Department of Energy (DOE), to establish conditional sunset dates for “regulations governing energy production.” The stated objective of the EO is to require agencies to periodically reexamine their regulations to ensure that they continue to serve the public good. For FERC, the order covers regulations promulgated under the Federal Power Act (FPA), the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act (FUA)3, as amended, while DOE must consider regulations promulgated under the Atomic Energy Act (AEA), the National Appliance Energy Conservation Act, the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct 1992), the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005) and the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), as amended (collectively the Covered Regulations).4 To the extent the DOE has been directed to promulgate regulations under various sections of the NGA, FPA and FUA, and FERC has been directed to promulgate regulations specific to the statutes attributed to the DOE in the EO, the EO is silent. The EO expressly does not apply to those “regulatory permitting regimes authorized by statute.”5

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

April 10, 2025

On April 8, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order (EO) directing the Department of Energy (DOE) to take steps to expand the use of its emergency authority under Federal Power Act (FPA) Section 202(c) to require the retention of generation resources deemed necessary to maintain resource adequacy within at risk-regions of the bulk power system regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).1 The EO appears to envision a more active role for DOE in overseeing and supporting the resource adequacy of the grid that deviates from the historic use of Section 202(c) and touches on issues at the intersection of state and federal authority over resource planning.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

March 10, 2025

On March 5, 2025, the United States Department of Energy (DOE) approved Golden Pass LNG Terminal LLC’s (GPLNG) request to extend a deadline to begin exporting liquefied natural gas (LNG) from its terminal facility currently under construction in Sabine Pass, Texas for 18 months, from September 30, 2025, to March 31, 2027 (the Order). The Order amends GPLNG’s two existing long-term orders authorizing the export of domestically produced LNG to countries with which the United States does and does not have free trade agreements (FTA).1  The Order does not amend the authorizations’ end date, which remains December 31, 2050. Under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), the DOE may authorize exports to non-FTA countries following completion of a “public interest” review, whereas exports to FTA countries are deemed to be in the public interest and the DOE is directed to issue authorizations without modification or delay.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

March 4, 2025

Join projects & energy transition partner Shariff Barakat at Infocast’s Solar & Wind, where he will moderate the “Tax Equity Market Dynamics” panel.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 13, 2025

Oil & gas companies continue to identify and capitalize on opportunities related to the deployment of new energy technologies, with their approaches broadly maturing and coalescing around maximizing synergies, leveraging available subsidies and responding to regulatory drivers.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 11, 2025

On January 30, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) approved a Stipulation and Consent Agreement (Agreement) between the Office of Enforcement (OE) and Stronghold Digital Mining Inc. (Stronghold) resolving an investigation into whether Stronghold had violated the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) tariff and Commission regulations by limiting the quantity of energy made available to the market to serve a co-located Bitcoin mining operation.1 This order appears to be the first instance of a public enforcement action involving co-located load and generation and comes at a time when both FERC and market operators2 are scrutinizing the treatment of co-located load due to the rapid increase in demand associated with data center development.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 5, 2025

2024 was about post-consolidation deal flow and a steady uptick in activity across the oil & gas market. This year, mergers & acquisitions (M&A) activity looks set to take on a different tone as major consolidation plays bed down.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

January 30, 2025

The oil & gas industry is experiencing a capital resurgence, driven by stabilizing interest rates and renewed attention from institutional investors. Private equity is leading the charge with private credit filling the void in traditional energy finance and hybrid capital instruments gaining in popularity. Family offices are also playing a crucial role, providing long-term, flexible investments.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.