New Women’s Equality Act Legislation Raises Bar for New York Firms

Oct 27, 2015

Reading Time : 4 min

New York Equal Pay Act

The new law amends the New York Equal Pay Act, making it more difficult for firms to defend such claims. Previously, firms could prevail in such actions by showing that a pay disparity between a man and a woman resulted from “any other factor than sex.” The new law tightens this standard, requiring a firm to offer proof of a “bona fide factor” other than sex which is both “job-related” and “consistent with business necessity.” The statute specifically mentions “education, training, [and] experience” as bona fide factors that may warrant different rates of pay in certain circumstances. The new standard thus makes it more difficult for firms to defend pay disparities, including those based on subjective factors. Other common industry practices, such as setting wages based on an incoming employee’s compensation at his or her previous firm, also may become more risky under the new standard.

Further, even when a firm can demonstrate bona fide reasons for a particular wage differential, a plaintiff can overcome such a showing by demonstrating that (a) the firm uses a particular employment practice that caused a disparate impact based on sex, (b) an alternative employment practice would serve the same business purpose without such an impact, and (c) the firm has refused to adopt this alternative practice.

Not only does the new law increase firms’ risk of exposure, it also raises the stakes. In addition to recovering the amount of any disparity in pay, the law provides aggrieved plaintiffs with the opportunity to collect liquidated damages of up to 300 percent of unpaid wages for willful violations, as well as the potential to recover their attorneys’ fees in bringing such action. 

Further, the new law restricts a firm’s ability to maintain secrecy over employee compensation information, preventing firms from “prohibit[ing] an employee from inquiring about, discussing or disclosing” employee wages (though firms can place reasonable limitations on the time and location of such discussions).

Discrimination Based on Familial Status

The new law amends the New York State Human Rights Law to prohibit discrimination on the basis of familial status, in addition to the current prohibition against discrimination on the basis of marital status. The law restricts firms from inquiring into or considering parental status when making employment decisions, such as those relating to hiring, firing, compensation, promotions and/or raises.

Pregnancy Discrimination

The amended law requires firms to provide “reasonable accommodations” for employees with pregnancy-related conditions, including miscarriage, abortion, childbirth and subsequent recovery. Reasonable accommodations are likely to include bathroom breaks, water breaks, time off for doctors’ appointments and leaves of absence during periods of disability. Firms can require employees to provide medical information verifying the existence of the pregnancy-related condition and the need for the accommodation. As is the case under existing law governing employees with disabilities, firms are not required to grant requests for accommodations that impose an “undue hardship.”

Attorneys’ Fees For Sex Discrimination Claims

The law amends the New York State Human Rights Law to permit the recovery of reasonable attorneys’ fees for plaintiffs who succeed in proving sex-discrimination. The primary impact of this change will be felt by small New York employers outside of New York City, as federal law (covering employers with fifteen (15) or more employees) and New York City law (covering employers with four (4) or more employees) already permit this remedy. Notably, however, the recent amendments also permit a successful defendant to recover attorneys’ fees where the defendant can show that the plaintiff’s claims were frivolous in nature.1

What You Should Do:

Firms with operations in New York should expect an uptick in litigation under the new Women’s Equality laws. Claims under the New York Equal Pay Act are bound to increase in light of the higher bar to defending such claims and the new provision permitting liquidated damages of up to 300% for willful violations. Claims alleging discrimination based on familial status, and an increase in claims alleging pregnancy discrimination, also can be anticipated.

Firms should use the period from now until January 19, 2016 (when the new laws become effective) to assess their existing pay practices and pay structure and their human resources policies and protocols. At many firms, compensation decisions for 2015 and/or 2016 will be determined over the next several months, making it an opportune time to address any pay disparities that may exist. Firms should involve their counsel in these reviews, and take all appropriate steps to shroud their reviews in the attorney-client privilege.

Firms also should take fresh looks at their employment templates and policies, and their contracts with employees, to ensure compliance with the new laws, including the above-noted proscriptions on employee confidentiality policies with respect to wage-related information.

We are available to assist firms as they consider and confront these emerging issues.

Contact Information:

If you have any questions regarding this alert, please feel free to contact:

Lauren Helen Leyden
lleyden@akingump.com
212.872.8172
New York

Richard J. Rabin
rrabin@akingump.com
212.872.1086
New York

Desiree E. Busching
dbusching@akingump.com
212.872.1061
New York

Anastasia Marie Kerdock
akerdock@akingump.com
212.872.7432
New York

Jeffrey L. Wiener
jwiener@akingump.com
212.872.8084
New York

 

1 The new law also allows employees to file sexual harassment complaints against employers of any size. Previously, employees could pursue such claims only against entities with four (4) or more employees.

Share This Insight

Categories

Previous Entries

Deal Diary

June 27, 2024

On June 24, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published five new Form 8-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) expanding the agency’s interpretations of cybersecurity incident disclosures pursuant to Item 1.05 of Form 8-K. In July 2023, the SEC adopted final rules with respect to cybersecurity incidents that generally require public companies to disclose (i) material cybersecurity incidents within four business days after determining the incident was material and (ii) material information regarding their cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance on an annual basis. We wrote about the final cybersecurity disclosure rules here.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 12, 2024

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently adopted final rules (available here; also see the fact sheet and press release) representing significant changes to  special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), shell companies and the disclosure of projections. These rules aim to enhance disclosures, protect investors and align the regulatory framework for SPACs with traditional IPOs. The following summarizes the key aspects of these rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

October 4, 2023

On September 20, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a final rule amending the so-called “Names Rule” (found here) that is “designed to modernize and enhance” protections under Rule 35d-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The final rule is part of the SEC’s holistic efforts to regulate environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, and is the SEC’s latest attempt to curb greenwashing in U.S. capital markets. The amendments require registered investment funds that include ESG factors in their names to place 80% of their assets in investments corresponding to those factors, thereby extending to ESG funds the SEC’s long-standing approach of regulating the names of registered funds to ensure they are marketed to investors truthfully. Fund complexes with more than $1 billion in assets will have two years from the final rule’s effective date (60 days after publication in the Federal Register) to comply, while fund complexes with less than $1 billion in assets will be given a compliance period of 30 months.

Chair Gary Gensler said “[t]he Names Rule reflects a basic idea: A fund’s investment portfolio should match a fund’s advertised investment focus. In essence, if a fund’s name suggests an investment focus, the fund in turn needs to invest shareholders’ dollars in a manner consistent with that investment focus. Otherwise, a fund’s portfolio might be inconsistent with what fund investors desired when selecting a fund based upon its name.” The sole dissenting vote against the rule modification, Commissioner Mark Uyeda, said “[w]ith these amendments, the Commission overemphasizes the importance of a fund’s name, as if to suggest that investors and their financial professionals need not look at the prospectus disclosures.” Commissioner Uyeda also expressed concern that fund investors will bear the increased compliance costs associated with the rule change.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 31, 2023

As discussed in our prior publication (found here), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments on December 14, 2022, regarding Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures. On May 25, 2023, the SEC issued three new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs) relating to the Rule 10b5-1 amendments.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 24, 2023

On May 15, 2023, the Eastern District of California ruled that California Assembly Bill No. 979 (“AB 979”) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. As enacted, California’s Board Diversity Statute, required public companies with headquarters in the state to include a minimum number of directors from “underrepresented communities” or be subject to fines for violating the statute. AB 979 defines a “director from an underrepresented community” as “an individual who self-identifies as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, Native Hawaiian, or Alaska Native, or who self-identifies as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender.”

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 9, 2023

Update: On October 31, 2023, the Fifth Circuit granted the US Chamber of Commerce's petition for review of the SEC's share repurchase disclosure rules, holding that the SEC acted arbitrarily and capriciously in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. The court directed the SEC to correct the defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 1, 2023, the SEC informed the Fifth Circuit that it was unable to correct the rule's defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 19, 2023, the Fifth Circuit vacated the SEC’s share repurchase disclosure rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

April 12, 2023

We have released our 2023 ESG Survey which includes a collection of reports reflecting on significant ESG themes and trends from 2022, as well as what we believe to be key developments for 2023.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 6, 2023

As companies begin preparing for the 2023 proxy season, we note that Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) and Glass Lewis, the leading providers of corporate governance solutions and proxy advisory services, issued updated benchmark policies (proxy voting guidelines), which can be found here and here, respectively. The updated proxy voting guidelines generally focus on board accountability and oversight considerations and address topics such as climate accountability, board diversity, shareholder rights, corporate governance standards, executive compensation and social issues. What follows is a summary of the proxy voting guidelines published by ISS and Glass Lewis for the 2023 proxy season.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.