Citizen Petition Calls on FDA to Rethink Refined Carbs

August 12, 2025

Reading Time : 1 min

Last week, former Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner David Kessler submitted a citizen petition urging FDA to revoke the generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status of refined carbohydrates used in industrial food processing. The petition follows FDA’s and the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) joint request for information (RFI) to establish a formal definition for ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and offers FDA a legal pathway to change the regulatory status of these ingredients.

Specifically, the petition focuses on refined sweeteners and refined flour and starches, including corn syrup, corn solids, glucose syrups, wheat and corn flour—highlighting these ingredients as key markers of UPFs. The petitioner argues that processed refined carbohydrates can no longer be considered GRAS in light of scientific evidence linking their consumption to metabolic harm leading to obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease. If granted as proposed, manufacturers would be required to submit food additive petitions to demonstrate the safety of these ingredients for continued use.

The petition marks a potential turning point in FDA’s approach to food regulation. While Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has so far relied on voluntary industry action to remove synthetic dyes and other additives from consumer products, this petition calls for a more assertive regulatory stance. It also aligns with growing public and institutional appetite to address the health impacts of UPFs and other food additives, as reflected in the forthcoming final Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Commission report.

The agency has 180 days to respond to the petition.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Eye on FDA

January 28, 2026

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has begun 2026 with a clear signal to the direct‑to‑consumer testing industry: self‑collection devices remain firmly within the agency’s regulatory reach, notwithstanding the 2025 court ruling on laboratory developed tests (LDTs). Last week, the agency published warning letters previously issued to four companies—Genetrace, Genovate, Germaphobix and ProDx Health—selling human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) tests that rely on unauthorized self‑collection kits.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

January 7, 2026

On January 6, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) updated its guidance documents on Clinical Decision Support (CDS) software and general wellness products, and withdrew its guidance on the adoption of international principles for Software as a Medical Device (SaMD): Clinical Evaluation. FDA’s policy changes lean toward a more deregulatory approach to digital health, including enforcement discretion for certain prediction software, and exemption of certain wearables with non-invasive monitoring from FDA regulation.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

December 22, 2025

On December 18, 2025, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a final guidance entitled “Processes and Practices Applicable to Bioresearch Monitoring Inspections.” The guidance was issued to comply with the Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act of 2022, which directs FDA to issue guidance describing the processes and practices applicable to inspections of sites and facilities inspected under FDA’s Bioresearch Monitoring (BIMO) inspection program, to the extent that is not covered in already available FDA guides and manuals. The BIMO program was established to assess and monitor the conduct and reporting of FDA-regulated research as well as postmarketing activities through on-site inspections, investigations and Remote Regulatory Assessments.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

December 15, 2025

On December 5, 2025, FDA announced its Technology-Enabled Meaningful Patient Outcomes (TEMPO) for Digital Health Devices Pilot, a new voluntary pilot that seeks to accelerate innovation and expand access to digital health devices for people living with chronic conditions. Under TEMPO, FDA will evaluate a new, risk-based enforcement approach that supports digital health devices intended for use to improve patient outcomes in cardio-kidney-metabolic, musculoskeletal and behavioral health conditions. Under the pilot, participating manufacturers may request that the agency exercise enforcement discretion for certain requirements, such as premarket authorization and investigational device requirements, while manufacturers collect and share real-world data demonstrating the device’s performance.

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.