FDA Continues Focus on Rare Disease Drug Development, Announces Evidence Principles

September 8, 2025

Reading Time : 1 min

On September 3, 2025, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced Rare Disease Evidence Principles (RDEP) with processes aimed at providing greater predictability and facilitating the development and review of drugs intended to treat rare diseases with very small patient populations and significant unmet medical needs driven by a known genetic defect. In conjunction with the agency’s announcement of the new processes jointly proposed by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), the agency also unveiled additional information regarding eligibility and the potential for post-marketing requirements for those sponsors who participate in it.

The agency aims to provide greater regulatory certainty through RDEP, including providing sponsors with greater clarity on the kind of evidence that can demonstrate substantial evidence of effectiveness given the inherent challenges in developing medicines for such small patient populations. Drug development is not one-size-fits-all and rare disease drug development presents particularly unique challenges not typically encountered in the development of drugs intended to treat larger disease patient populations. It can be particularly challenging to produce evidence to meet the statutory requirements for demonstrating efficacy through traditional trial designs and the required number of clinical studies for rare diseases given the smaller patient population. Under the RDEP process, effectiveness may be established based on one adequate and well-controlled study with robust confirmatory evidence, which may include strong mechanistic or biomarker evidence, evidence from relevant non-clinical models, clinical pharmacodynamic data and/or case reports, expanded access data, or natural history studies.

Drug developers may want to consider how RDEP may fit within their rare disease drug development programs. RDEP may also be of interest to rare disease patients and Congress given the ongoing interest in these policy areas and ahead of the next Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) reauthorization which is often a time in which lawmakers focus on FDA’s rare disease focused work.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Eye on FDA

December 22, 2025

On December 18, 2025, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a final guidance entitled “Processes and Practices Applicable to Bioresearch Monitoring Inspections.” The guidance was issued to comply with the Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act of 2022, which directs FDA to issue guidance describing the processes and practices applicable to inspections of sites and facilities inspected under FDA’s Bioresearch Monitoring (BIMO) inspection program, to the extent that is not covered in already available FDA guides and manuals. The BIMO program was established to assess and monitor the conduct and reporting of FDA-regulated research as well as postmarketing activities through on-site inspections, investigations and Remote Regulatory Assessments.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

December 15, 2025

On December 5, 2025, FDA announced its Technology-Enabled Meaningful Patient Outcomes (TEMPO) for Digital Health Devices Pilot, a new voluntary pilot that seeks to accelerate innovation and expand access to digital health devices for people living with chronic conditions. Under TEMPO, FDA will evaluate a new, risk-based enforcement approach that supports digital health devices intended for use to improve patient outcomes in cardio-kidney-metabolic, musculoskeletal and behavioral health conditions. Under the pilot, participating manufacturers may request that the agency exercise enforcement discretion for certain requirements, such as premarket authorization and investigational device requirements, while manufacturers collect and share real-world data demonstrating the device’s performance.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

November 5, 2025

Last week, FDA released draft guidance titled “Scientific Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity to a Reference Product: Updated Recommendations for Assessing the Need for Comparative Efficacy Studies.” This draft guidance reflects an evolution in FDA’s approach to determining whether a comparative clinical study with efficacy endpoints (a comparative efficacy study or CES) is necessary to support a demonstration of biosimilarity. Specifically, the agency notes that a comparative analytical assessment (CAA) is generally more sensitive when it comes to detecting differences between products than a CES.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

October 27, 2025

On October 23, 2025, FDA released its final guidance regarding Patient-Focused Drug Development: Selecting, Developing, or Modifying Fit-for-Purpose Clinical Outcome Assessments. The guidance is the third guidance in a four-part series of FDA guidance focused on patient-focused drug development (PFDD) that describe how stakeholders, such as patients, caregivers, researchers, medical product developers and others can submit patient experience data and other relevant information that can be used for medical product development and regulatory decision making.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.