FDA Presses Forward on PDUFA VII CGT Commitments with Release of Draft Guidance on Clinical Trial Design, Methods for Capturing Postapproval Data

September 29, 2025

Reading Time : 2 min

FDA recently released two draft guidance documents for industry related to cell and gene therapy (CGT) products as the agency seeks to advance the efficient development and review of safe and effective CGT products and fulfill related commitments set forth in the 2022 reauthorization of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA VII). This latest guidance may be of particular interest to CGT developers and various patient groups.

The first draft guidance provides recommendations to sponsors planning clinical trials for CGT products intended for use in a disease or condition that affects a small patient population. It expands on FDA’s existing guidance related to rare disease drug development by providing additional recommendations for the planning, design, conduct and analysis of CGT trials to facilitate FDA’s assessment of product effectiveness. In the draft, FDA details a non-exhaustive list of designs sponsors may consider, including single-arm trials utilizing participants as their own control, disease progression modeling and externally controlled studies. FDA also suggests several issues for sponsors to consider concerning participant selection, such as evaluating the appropriateness of requiring participants to have exhausted available therapies for clinical trial entry. FDA also recommends that product sponsors discuss options for innovative clinical trial designs with the agency as early as possible. In announcing this guidance, FDA requested comments be submitted by November 24, 2025.

The second draft guidance discusses the methods for collecting postapproval study data for CGT products. Because CGT products are often approved based on small clinical trial populations, the guidance lays out how postapproval monitoring can increase understanding of long-term safety and efficacy, help guide safe clinical use, and inform subsequent regulatory decision making. The guidance outlines several methods and approaches for capturing postapproval marketing data, including (1) using real-world data and real-world evidence (e.g., following FDA’s existing real-world evidence program); (2) using electronic health records, medical claims and vital statistics data to, for example, assess rates of clinical outcomes in CGT-treated patients; (3) using registries, which can track long-term durability of response after exposure to CGTs or surveil for malignancies after receiving CGT products; and (4) decentralized data collection outside of the traditional clinical sites to facilitate more accessible and less burdensome data collection. The draft guidance acknowledges that limited preapproval data can be balanced with additional postapproval study data for CGT products, while also considering data quality, patient privacy and the unique needs of pediatric patients. In announcing this guidance, FDA requested comments be submitted by December 24, 2025.

 

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Eye on FDA

December 22, 2025

On December 18, 2025, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a final guidance entitled “Processes and Practices Applicable to Bioresearch Monitoring Inspections.” The guidance was issued to comply with the Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act of 2022, which directs FDA to issue guidance describing the processes and practices applicable to inspections of sites and facilities inspected under FDA’s Bioresearch Monitoring (BIMO) inspection program, to the extent that is not covered in already available FDA guides and manuals. The BIMO program was established to assess and monitor the conduct and reporting of FDA-regulated research as well as postmarketing activities through on-site inspections, investigations and Remote Regulatory Assessments.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

December 15, 2025

On December 5, 2025, FDA announced its Technology-Enabled Meaningful Patient Outcomes (TEMPO) for Digital Health Devices Pilot, a new voluntary pilot that seeks to accelerate innovation and expand access to digital health devices for people living with chronic conditions. Under TEMPO, FDA will evaluate a new, risk-based enforcement approach that supports digital health devices intended for use to improve patient outcomes in cardio-kidney-metabolic, musculoskeletal and behavioral health conditions. Under the pilot, participating manufacturers may request that the agency exercise enforcement discretion for certain requirements, such as premarket authorization and investigational device requirements, while manufacturers collect and share real-world data demonstrating the device’s performance.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

November 5, 2025

Last week, FDA released draft guidance titled “Scientific Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity to a Reference Product: Updated Recommendations for Assessing the Need for Comparative Efficacy Studies.” This draft guidance reflects an evolution in FDA’s approach to determining whether a comparative clinical study with efficacy endpoints (a comparative efficacy study or CES) is necessary to support a demonstration of biosimilarity. Specifically, the agency notes that a comparative analytical assessment (CAA) is generally more sensitive when it comes to detecting differences between products than a CES.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

October 27, 2025

On October 23, 2025, FDA released its final guidance regarding Patient-Focused Drug Development: Selecting, Developing, or Modifying Fit-for-Purpose Clinical Outcome Assessments. The guidance is the third guidance in a four-part series of FDA guidance focused on patient-focused drug development (PFDD) that describe how stakeholders, such as patients, caregivers, researchers, medical product developers and others can submit patient experience data and other relevant information that can be used for medical product development and regulatory decision making.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.