HHS, FDA Announce Phase Out of Synthetic Dyes in Foods as MAHA Agenda Advances

April 23, 2025

Reading Time : 2 min

This week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in collaboration with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), announced a series of new measures to phase out all petroleum-based synthetic dyes in food by the end of 2026. This initiative is part of the broader “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) agenda aimed at bolstering food safety. Citing growing concerns about the potential role of petroleum-based food dyes in childhood diabetes, obesity, depression and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the agency plans to establish a national standard and timeline for the food industry to transition to natural alternatives.

Key actions include the following:

  • Revocation of Authorizations: FDA will begin the process of revoking approvals of Citrus Red No. 2 and Orange B.
  • Elimination of Additional Dyes: FDA will work with industry to eliminate six commonly used synthetic dyes—FD&C Green No. 3, FD&C Red No. 40, FD&C Yellow No. 5, FD&C Yellow No. 6, FD&C Blue No. 1 and FD&C Blue No. 2—by the end of 2026. Additionally, the agency is requesting companies to remove FD&C Red No. 3 sooner than the previous 2027-2028 deadline. See our previous post on Red No. 3 here.
  • Fast-Track of Natural Alternatives: The agency will authorize four new natural color additives in the near term and expedite review of additional applications for other natural alternatives.
  • Research Collaboration: In partnership with the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the agency intends to conduct comprehensive research on the impact of food additives on child health and development.

The agency’s move signals a broader shift in the oversight of food additives. Industry participants should expect to see additional regulatory developments and announcements by the Trump administration. Industry participants should begin assessing the impact of these changes on their operations in preparation of these forthcoming changes, including assessing whether direct engagement with the agency is appropriate to address product-specific concerns. At this time, the agency has not opened a new public docket or announced how it plans to proceed. Ultimately, a change in regulations would be required to ban these ingredients, just as the Biden administration FDA did in January in revoking the authorized uses of FD&C Red No. 3. Companies should closely monitor agency communications and the Federal Register for potential opportunities to provide input.

While the current announcement is limited to synthetic dyes used in foods, the administration has signaled its desire to reevaluate the use of similar color additives in non-food products, such as pharmaceuticals and cosmetics. Notably, the recent revocation for FD&C Red No. 3 also applied to ingested drugs. Conceivably, the agency inquiry into the safety of these additives for use in foods could be expanded to consider their safety in ingested drugs or products that otherwise come in contact with the human body.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Eye on FDA

April 8, 2026

On March 31, 2026, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a notice in the Federal Register requesting information and public comment (RFI) on the use of digital health technologies (DHTs) in clinical investigations for drugs and biological products. To inform potential FDA activities in this area, the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) are seeking feedback to better understand the opportunities and challenges associated with using these innovative technologies in clinical investigations.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

April 1, 2026

On March 30, 2026, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a final guidance entitled “Incorporating Voluntary Patient Preference Information over the Total Product Life Cycle.” The guidance provides updated recommendations to industry and FDA on how and when voluntary patient preference information (PPI) may be considered by FDA staff in decision making relating to devices. PPI is not required for FDA’s consideration as part of FDA decision making, but FDA may find it valuable to consider patient viewpoints when the information meets applicable legal requirements. In addition, FDA encourages industry and other interested parties to consider patient experience data in device development and evaluation, including data relating to patient preferences for outcomes and treatments. FDA acknowledges that patient perspective and personal experiences can help FDA evaluate the benefit-risk profile of certain devices throughout the total product life cycle.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

March 24, 2026

On March 20, 2026, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the agency will hold a public hearing on the Commissioner’s National Priority Voucher (CNPV) Pilot Program, with a Federal Register notice soliciting public comment and scheduling a public hearing for June 12, 2026. As previously noted here and here, the program was announced in June 2025 for the purpose of providing select sponsors with a nontransferable voucher for enhanced engagement with FDA and expedited review for drugs and biologics supporting one or more critical national health priorities, while maintaining adherence to the law’s rigorous safety and effectiveness standards. The national health priorities include public health crisis response, innovative breakthrough therapies, large unmet medical needs, onshoring and supply chain resilience initiatives, and affordability improvements. To date, FDA has issued 18 Commissioner’s National Priority vouchers and approved four products to receive these vouchers, including two oncology drugs 44 and 55 days after filing.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

March 20, 2026

On March 18, 2026, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued draft guidance entitled “General Considerations for the Use of New Approach Methodologies in Drug Development.” The guidance is meant to provide drug developers with a validation framework and general recommendations for using new approach methodologies (NAMs) in drug development. The use of NAMs can improve predictive toxicology in humans and reduce reliance on animal testing.

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.