2016 Review: Developments In The Regulation of The UK Continental Shelf

Dec 16, 2016

Reading Time : 3 min

It marks the final step in the creation of an independent regulator. This change coincided with a number of OGA policy and strategy papers intended to promote efficient operating standards in the U.K. continental shelf (UKCS). The central theme of these papers, as well as the creation and existence of the OGA, is to keep the UKCS competitive and sustainable as a mature basin operating in a low-oil-price environment.

Shortly following the OGA’s incorporation, a number of additional strategy papers were published that are designed to encourage better behaviours among U.K. industry participants. This blog briefly describes the creation of the OGA and policies introduced since incorporation.

Oil & Gas Authority

The OGA was created on 1 April 2015, following a report by Sir John Wood (the “Wood Review”) recommending changes to “maximise economic recoveries” in the offshore oil and gas industry. This overarching aim, commonly referred to as MER UK, is a policy objective that is central to the OGA. It has been included in the amended Petroleum Act as a “principal purpose.” Legislation requires the OGA to produce strategy papers enabling this objective to be met. A host of industry participants, from the OGA, to the Secretary of State and commercial operators, are now required by law to act in accordance with the principal purpose as detailed in the OGA’s strategies.

The OGA was set up to fulfil the Wood Review’s recommendation to establish an arm’s-length body responsible for the stewardship and regulation of the UKCS, and the promotion of business and regulatory conditions designed to facilitate MER UK. To achieve this, the OGA assumed some of the existing functions of the Department of Energy and Climate Change and its successors (DECC), and was also endowed with additional powers. 

Until recently, the OGA functioned as an executive agency within DECC, largely exercising the licensing and regulatory functions previously undertaken by the government department. This year, however, we have seen the OGA’s first steps, above and beyond these transferred powers, to take on a role as a regulator actively promoting efficiencies and maximum recoveries.  

Since incorporation, the OGA has published papers on a range of topics, including strategies and programmes on exploration, asset stewardship, supply chain and enhanced oil recovery. Each of these papers is prefaced by a reminder that MER UK underpins the remit of the OGA and that, since March 2016, compliance with MER UK has become a legal obligation of U.K. petroleum licensees.

Strategies

In accordance with its statutory obligation, in October 2016, the OGA has produced a number of additional strategy documents, including:

  • Exploration strategy: The strategy paper notes that exploration activity in the UKCS is at an all-time low. To encourage exploration, the OGA will deliver a government-funded seismic acquisition and reprocessing programme and publish subsurface data packages. Together with industry, the OGA is evaluating different business models for seismic acquisition programmes. In the medium term, the OGA will produce high-quality geological maps and draft new model licence terms for frontier blocks and mature areas.
  • Asset stewardship: The strategy paper sets out a list of behaviours that aim to ensure that opportunities are fully identified, the resource base is increased and recovery is maximised. A MER UK asset stewardship board has been established, designed to champion and monitor this strategy. Targets for production efficiency, Opex reduction and enhanced oil recovery have been set. Furthermore, the OGA intends to develop benchmarking between fields to set standards for production efficiency, recovery factor, operating costs and decommissioning costs. This data will be made available to industry on an anonymised and non-attributable basis.
  • Supply chain strategy: Although the OGA does not regulate the service sector, it recognises the role played by the supply chain to achieve MER UK. To this end, it has established the MER UK supply chain, exports and skills board with a broad membership of expertise from different sectors. The OGA has identified the potential over the next 20 years to double the service sector’s share of the global market and to increase the United Kingdom’s share of services to the domestic market. Accordingly, the OGA has also published a supply chain delivery programme that aims to communicate supply chain capability, encourage innovation, improve cost efficiencies, increase share of export and domestic market, and retain and develop the United Kingdom’s supply chain capability.

In 2016, the oil price has found a stable, if still low, floor. The strategy papers described above, and the work of the OGA generally, are intended to create an industry that is better able to cope with a continuing low-price environment. Having published these strategy papers, the United Kingdom’s oil & gas industry, with the help of the OGA, will implement these ideas in the 2017 and the year’s beyond.

Share This Insight

Categories

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

July 8, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to ISO New England Inc. (ISO-NE) directing ISO-NE and ISO-NE participating transmission owners to show cause as to why ISO-NE’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (ISO New England Inc., 195 FERC ¶ 61,215 (2026) (Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 7, 2026

On June 29, 2026, the Supreme Court granted a petition for certiorari in Leonard Hoffmann v. WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. (Hoffmann), which presents the question whether section 7 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) requires pipeline companies using federal eminent domain authority to pay landowners’ attorney’s fees in states where landowners can recover those fees under state law. In the decision giving rise to the Supreme Court’s review, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that a group of ranchers were not entitled to recover their $383,300 in attorney’s fees incurred while negotiating their compensation—creating a circuit split with four other courts of appeals. Hoffmann will be heard during the Court’s October 2026 Term, and marks the second time in five years that the Court has agreed to interpret NGA section 7.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 6, 2026

On June 29, 2026, the United States Supreme Court issued Trump v. Slaughter, fundamentally reshaping presidential removal authority over independent regulatory agencies. The decision overruled a 90-year-old precedent established in Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, which had upheld the constitutionality of commissioner removal protections in the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act). As written, the FTC Act permits a commissioner’s removal “only for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.” In Slaughter, the Court was asked to reevaluate this standard following the President’s removal of a Democratic-appointed FTC commissioner from office in 2025 without cause. Finding for the President, the Court held that removal was permissible because the FTC Act’s for-cause removal protections for commissioners violate the separation of powers, specifically, the President’s removal power under Article II. The Court explained that the FTC exercises executive power because it promulgates binding rules, investigates and enforces those rules through administrative adjudications, and brings civil enforcement actions in federal court. It found that because it exercises these executive powers, its commissioners “must therefore be controlled by the Chief Executive, in whom such power is vested.” While previous recent cases addressing the scope of the Removal Power, Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Collins v. Yellen purported to preserve some kernel of Humphrey’s, the Court made clear that “[i]f anything more is left of Humphrey’s, we overrule it.”

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 25, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to the California Independent System Operator Corporation (CAISO) directing CAISO and CAISO transmission owners to show cause as to why CAISO’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (California Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., 195 FERC ¶ 61,214 (2026) (the Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.