EPA May Again Update Enforcement and Cleanup Policies in Light of New COVID-19 Executive Order

May 22, 2020

Reading Time : 1 min

It remains to be seen how the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (and, frankly, other regulatory agencies) will respond to the Order in ongoing and future rulemaking and enforcement decisions. EPA itself stated it is “continuing to do its part to address COVID-19 while moving forward with a regulatory reform agenda,” and will “work to assess which EPA regulations might be available to streamline in order to achieve” the Order’s goals.2 EPA is ahead of the curve, having issued temporary guidance regarding its enforcement discretion and site field work during the pandemic over the past two months.3 (We discussed those guidance documents here and here.) Although both policies already provided broad flexibility, EPA may still update them in light of the Order’s directives and a growing understanding that the disruptions caused by the pandemic will not be short term. At the same time, however, EPA’s temporary enforcement discretion policy has generated significant concern among some members of Congress, and further enhancements to regulatory flexibilities could sow more discord with key legislators in oversight roles.4 In any event, regulated entities may get a sneak preview of any additional guidance when EPA publishes its Spring 2020 Unified Agenda, expected in the coming weeks. We will monitor that closely to see if it foreshadows further rollbacks, delays or other regulatory efforts to address the pandemic. Stay tuned for updates.


1 https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-regulatory-relief-support-economic-recovery/.

2 https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/498614-trump-orders-agencies-to-cut-regulations-that-inhibit-economic.

3 https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2020-03/documents/oecamemooncovid19implications.pdf.

4 https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/498813-epas-wheeler-grilled-by-democrats-over-environmental-rollbacks-amid.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

June 25, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to the California Independent System Operator Corporation (CAISO) directing CAISO and CAISO transmission owners to show cause as to why CAISO’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (California Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., 195 FERC ¶ 61,214 (2026) (the Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 24, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to New York Independent System Operator, Inc. (NYISO) directing NYISO and NYISO transmission owners to show cause as to why NYISO’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (New York Independent System Operator, Inc., 195 FERC ¶ 61,216 (2026) (Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 23, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. (MISO) directing MISO and MISO transmission owners to show cause as to why MISO’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., 195 FERC ¶ 61,212 (2026) (Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 23, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. directing PJM and PJM transmission owners to show cause as to why PJM’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 195 FERC ¶ 61,211 (2026) (the Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.