EPA Stepping Off the Gas at Cleanup Sites in Response to COVID-19

Apr 16, 2020

Reading Time : 2 min

The Guidance directs Regional Offices to determine whether to proceed with response actions at EPA-lead sites (as opposed to state- or private party-lead) on a case-by-case basis based on the following factors:

  • Stoppage requests from state, tribal or local health officials.
  • Positive tests or exhibited symptoms of COVID-19 among site workers.
  • Extent to which workers interact with high-risk or quarantined groups.
  • Applicable state, tribal or local travel restrictions that prevent worker travel to the site.
  • How effectively social distancing at the worksite can be maintained.
  • The likelihood that work stoppage would pose “an imminent and substantial endangerment to human health or the environment,” and the practicality of continuing the work.
  • The likelihood that continued work would lead to a reduction in human health risk/exposure in the next six months.

In a press release accompanying the Guidance, EPA indicated it already paused or reduced fieldwork at approximately 34 EPA or potentially responsible party (PRP)-lead Superfund National Priority List sites (representing 12 percent of all EPA sites with ongoing remedial actions) due to the crisis.3

The Guidance also suggests use of the above factors by Regional Offices in responding to requests for dispensation by PRPs and others in non-EPA lead sites. These requests to modify a schedule or for other relief may complement force majeure provisions in the applicable enforcement instrument or other schedule adjustments at the discretion of EPA’s project lead. In the least, such parties should regularly communicate with their site’s EPA project manager about the status of their sites and associated field work, and any anticipated challenges and corresponding mitigation measures as a result of COVID-19.

As mentioned, the Guidance applies only to EPA-lead sites, leaving it to the states to issue their own policies that may apply to fieldwork. Some already have, and we anticipate others will follow suit.4 In all, the Guidance may allow measured, site-specific responses to disruptions and other impacts caused by the coronavirus pandemic.


1 Memorandum from Peter C. Wright, Assistant Administrator, Office of Land and Emergency Mgmt., and Susan Parker Bodine, Assistant Administrator, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, to EPA Regional Administrators, Regions I-X, U.S. Envtl. Protection Agency (Apr. 10, 2020), https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/
files/2020-04/documents/interim_guidance_on_site_field_work_decisions_due_to_impacts_of_covid.pdf
.

2 Memorandum from Susan Parker Bodine, U.S. Envtl. Protection Agency, to All Governmental and Private Sector Partners (Mar. 26, 2020), https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2020-03/documents/
oecamemooncovid19implications.pdf
.

3 “EPA Takes Action to Guide Health and Safety Decisions at Cleanup Sites During the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Press Release from the U.S. Envtl. Protection Agency (Apr. 10, 2020), https://www.epa.gov/
newsreleases/epa-takes-action-guide-health-and-safety-decisions-cleanup-sites-during-covid-19
.

4 E.g., N.Y. Dept. of Envtl. Conservation, Environmental Cleanup & Brownfields: COVID-19 Update, https://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/brownfields.html; Minn. Pollution Control Agency, COVID-19 and regulatory flexibility, https://www.pca.state.mn.us/covid-19/covid-19-and-regulatory-flexibility.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

August 15, 2025

On August 8, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued an enforcement order in Skye MS, LLC (Skye) and levied a $45,000 civil penalty on an intrastate pipeline operator in Mississippi, resolving an investigation into the operator’s violations of section 311 (Section 311) of the Natural Gas Policy Act (NGPA). FERC faulted the operator for providing a Section 311 transportation service without timely filing a Statement of Operating Conditions (SOC) and obtaining FERC’s approval for the transportation rates. Section 311 permits intrastate pipelines to transport interstate gas “on behalf of” interstate pipelines without becoming subject to FERC’s more extensive Natural Gas Act (NGA) jurisdiction, but requires the intrastate pipeline to have an SOC stating the rates and terms and conditions of service on file with FERC within 30 days of providing the interstate service. Under the NGPA, Section 311 rates must be “fair and equitable” and approved by FERC. In Skye, FERC stated that the operator began providing Section 311 service on certain pipeline segments in Mississippi in May 2023, following their acquisition from another Section 311 operator, but did not file an SOC with FERC until April 2025. The order ties the penalty to the approximately two-year delay between commencement of the Section 311 service and the SOC filing date. The pipeline operator was also ordered to provide an annual compliance report and to abide by additional verification requirements related to the filing of its FERC Form No. 549D, the Quarterly Transportation & Storage Report for Intrastate Natural Gas and Hinshaw Pipelines.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

August 6, 2025

In Sierra Club v. FERC, No. 24-1199 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 1, 2025), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) upheld the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) approval of a 1,000-foot natural gas pipeline segment crossing the United States-Mexico border (the Border Pipeline) under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), rejecting environmental groups’ challenges that FERC improperly limited its analysis under both the NGA and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as related to a 155-mile intrastate “Connector Pipeline” constructed upstream of the Border Pipeline in Texas.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 17, 2025

On July 15, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) issued an order1 proposing to eliminate the soft price cap of $1,000 per megawatt-hour (MWh) for bilateral spot sales in the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) that was implemented following the California energy crisis. If adopted, the Commission’s proposal would eliminate the requirement that sellers make a filing with FERC cost justifying spot market sales in excess of the soft price cap, which have become increasingly common in recent years as market conditions have continued to tighten throughout the West. Eliminating the WECC soft price cap would provide sellers that make sales during periods when prices exceed the cap greater certainty that their sales will not be second guessed after the fact.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 25, 2025

On June 4–5, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) hosted a commissioner-led technical conference to discuss resource adequacy challenges facing regional transmission organizations and independent system operators (RTO). The conference is a response to the growing concern that multiple RTO regions across the country may not have sufficient supply available in the coming years to meet demand due to resource retirements, the pace of new generation entry and higher load growth arising from the construction of data centers and reindustrialization.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 12, 2025

We are pleased to share the presentation slide deck and a recording of Akin’s recently presented webinar, “Navigating U.S. Policy Shifts in the Critical Minerals Sector.”

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 10, 2025

On June 4, 2025, the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) announced revisions to its procedures for pipeline safety enforcement actions. The changes, outlined in two new policy memoranda from PHMSA’s Office of the Chief Counsel (PHC), aim to enhance due process protections for pipeline operators by clarifying how civil penalties are calculated and expanding the disclosure of agency records in enforcement proceedings.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

May 22, 2025

On May 19, 2025, the Department of Energy (DOE) finalized its 2024 LNG Export Study: Energy, Economic and Environmental Assessment of U.S. LNG Exports (the 2024 Study) through the release of a Response to Comments on the 2024 Study. The Response to Comments concludes that the 2024 Study, as augmented through public comments submitted on or before March 20, 2025, supporting a finding that liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports serve the public interest. With the comment process complete, DOE will move forward with final orders on pending applications to export LNG to non-free trade agreement (non-FTA) countries.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

May 20, 2025

On Thursday, May 15, the Senate Commerce, Science & Transportation Subcommittee on Surface Transportation, Freight, Pipelines and Safety held a hearing titled, “Pipeline Safety Reauthorization: Ensuring the Safe and Efficient Movement of American Energy.” The hearing examined legislative priorities for reauthorizing the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA).

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.