EPA to the Oil and Gas Industry: The Request is in the Mail

Oct 20, 2016

Reading Time : 1 min

The request will require a typical recipient, within 30 days, to report  the number and location of each oil and/or gas production facility, whether flare or thermal combustors are used, and the number and types of atmospheric tanks, separators, dehydrators, reciprocating processors, and dry or wet seal centrifugal compressors used at the facility. In addition, a limited number of respondents within each industry segment will be required to complete a much more detailed “Part 2 Facility Survey,” requiring detailed design, operational and regulatory information regarding a diverse range of facility equipment, including emission control devices, production well injection storage wells, tanks, separators, pneumatics, acid gas removal units, dehydrators, equipment leaks, compressors, blowdown events and acid gas removal units. Companies selected for the more detailed survey would have 120 days to submit their reports.

Given the breadth of these requests, the potential to divulge compliance issues in response, and the need to follow specific regulatory procedures to preserve confidentiality claims and present public disclosure (never mind EPA’s ability to use the information to create additional regulatory burdens and guide future enforcement actions), we suggest working with counsel in developing your response. We are also happy to talk with you prior to the issuance of the requests, either to engage with OMB prior to the completion of its review or to engage EPA to discuss the specific requests themselves.  


1 EPA, Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Information Collection Effort for Oil and Gas Facilities, 81 Fed. Reg. 66962 (Sept. 29, 2016). 

Share This Insight

Categories

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

December 21, 2025

On December 19, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued its much-anticipated order on show cause proceeding concerning the co-location of generation and load within the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) market.[1] In the order, the Commission finds that PJM’s tariff is unjust and unreasonable because it does not provide sufficient clarity on the rates, terms, and conditions of service applicable to generators serving Co-Located Load and does not include transmission services appropriate for customers that are willing and able to limit their use of the transmission system in certain conditions. 

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

November 25, 2025

We are pleased to share the program materials and a recording of Akin’s recently presented webinar, “Navigating the Evolving Landscape of Corporate PPAs.”

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

November 12, 2025

On November 7, 2025, the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) reversed their prior positions and approved Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 401 Water Quality Certifications and other environmental permits for the Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Company’s (Transco) Northeast Supply Enhancement Project (NESE). NESE is a 25-mile natural gas pipeline expansion project certificated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) that is intended to deliver 400,000 dekatherms per day of natural gas produced in Pennsylvania to local distribution company customers in New York City through new facilities in Middlesex County, New Jersey and an underwater segment traversing the Raritan and Lower New York Bays.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

November 6, 2025

The market for the direct procurement of energy by commercial and industrial buyers has been active in the U.S. for a decade.  In years past, buyers often engaged in such purchases on a voluntary basis to achieve their goals to use renewable energy.  These days, C&I buyers are turning to direct procurement or self-supply to obtain a reliable source of energy.  Sufficient and accessible energy from a local utility may not be available or may be materially delayed or trigger significant capital costs.  This is a material change driven in part by increased demand for electricity, including demand from data centers, EV infrastructure and industrial development.       

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.