FERC Invites Comments on State Energy Policy Technical Conference

Jun 1, 2017

Reading Time : 2 min

The Notice specifically invites comments on five possible paths forward that were identified by FERC staff during the technical conference:

Path 1 – Limited or No Minimum Offer Price Rule: an approach that would either not apply the minimum offer price rule to state-supported resources or limit application of the minimum offer price rule to only state-supported resources where federal law pre-empts the state action providing that support

Path 2 – Accommodation of State Actions: an approach that would accommodate state policies that provide out-of-market support with the operation of the wholesale markets by allowing state-supported resources to participate in those markets and, when relevant, obtain capacity supply obligations, subject to adjustments necessary to maintain certain wholesale market prices consistent with the market results that would have been produced had those resources not been state-supported

Path 3 – Status Quo (i.e., Litigation): an approach that would rely on existing tariff provisions applying the minimum offer price rule to some state-supported resources, and continuing case-by-case litigation over the specific line to be drawn between categories of state actions that may or may not result in a state-supported resource being subject to the minimum offer price rule

Path 4 – Pricing State Policy Choices: an approach in which state policies, to the extent possible, would value the attributes (e.g., resilience) or externalities (e.g., carbon emissions) that states are targeting in a manner that can be readily integrated into the wholesale markets in a resource-neutral way; for those state policies that cannot be readily valued and integrated into the wholesale markets, Path 4 would also require consideration of what, if anything, the Commission should do to address the market impacts of these state policies; for instance, other approaches for these state policies may include accommodation, application of the minimum offer price rule or an exemption from the minimum offer price rule

Path 5 – Expanded Minimum Offer Price Rule: an approach that would minimize the impact of state-supported resources on wholesale market prices by expanding the existing scope of the minimum offer price rule to apply to both new and existing capacity resources that participate in the capacity market and receive state support.3

FERC staff also invites comments on (i) how a path forward should be selected, (ii) the urgency of developing a solution, (ii) long-term expectations regarding the interaction between wholesale markets and state policies, and (iv) how competitive market frameworks can be reconciled with state preferences for certain resources.  In drafting comments, FERC staff indicates that commenters may reference materials from the technical conference’s record,4 including the day-one and day-two transcripts, “but are encouraged to avoid repetition or replication of previous material.”5

Initial comments are due on June 22, 2017, and should not exceed 15 pages.   Reply comments are due July 7, 2017, and should not exceed 10 pages.


1 Notice Inviting Post-Technical Conference Comments, Docket No. AD17-11-000 (May 23, 2017) (available here).

2 PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.; the New York Independent System Operator, Inc.; and ISO New England, Inc.

3 Notice at 1-2.

4 Docket No. AD17-11-000.

5 Notice at 3.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

May 22, 2025

On May 19, 2025, the Department of Energy (DOE) finalized its 2024 LNG Export Study: Energy, Economic and Environmental Assessment of U.S. LNG Exports
(the 2024 Study) through the release of a Response to Comments on the 2024 Study. The Response to Comments concludes that the 2024 Study, as
augmented through public comments submitted on or before March 20, 2025, supporting a finding that liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports serve the public
interest. With the comment process complete, DOE will move forward with final orders on pending applications to export LNG to non-free trade agreement
(non-FTA) countries.
...

Read More

Speaking Energy

May 20, 2025

On Thursday, May 15, the Senate Commerce, Science & Transportation Subcommittee on Surface Transportation, Freight, Pipelines and Safety held a hearing
titled, “Pipeline Safety Reauthorization: Ensuring the Safe and Efficient Movement of American Energy.” The hearing examined legislative priorities for
reauthorizing the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA).
...

Read More

Speaking Energy

April 15, 2025

On April 9, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order (EO)1 directing several federal agencies and subagencies that regulate energy, environmental,
and conservation matters,2 including the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the Department of Energy (DOE), to establish conditional sunset
dates for “regulations governing energy production.” The stated objective of the EO is to require agencies to periodically reexamine their regulations to
ensure that they continue to serve the public good. For FERC, the order covers regulations promulgated under the Federal Power Act (FPA), the Natural Gas
Act (NGA) and the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act (FUA)3, as amended, while DOE must consider regulations promulgated under the Atomic Energy
Act (AEA), the National Appliance Energy Conservation Act, the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct 1992), the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005) and the
Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), as amended (collectively the Covered Regulations).4 To the extent the DOE has been directed to pro...
...

Read More

Speaking Energy

April 10, 2025

On April 8, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order (EO) directing the Department of Energy (DOE) to take steps to expand the use of its emergency
authority under Federal Power Act (FPA) Section 202(c) to require the retention of generation resources deemed necessary to maintain resource adequacy
within at risk-regions of the bulk power system regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).1 The EO appears to envision a more active
role for DOE in overseeing and supporting the resource adequacy of the grid that deviates from the historic use of Section 202(c) and touches on issues at
the intersection of state and federal authority over resource planning.
...

Read More

Speaking Energy

March 10, 2025

On March 5, 2025, the United States Department of Energy (DOE) approved Golden Pass LNG Terminal LLC’s (GPLNG) request to extend a deadline to begin
exporting liquefied natural gas (LNG) from its terminal facility currently under construction in Sabine Pass, Texas for 18 months, from September 30, 2025, to
March 31, 2027 (the Order). The Order amends GPLNG’s two existing long-term orders authorizing the export of domestically produced LNG to countries with
which the United States does and does not have free trade agreements (FTA).1  The Order does not amend the authorizations’ end date, which remains
December 31, 2050. Under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), the DOE may authorize exports to non-FTA countries following completion of a “public
interest” review, whereas exports to FTA countries are deemed to be in the public interest and the DOE is directed to issue authorizations without
modification or delay.
...

Read More

Speaking Energy

March 4, 2025

Join projects & energy transition partner Shariff Barakat at Infocast’s Solar & Wind, where he will moderate the “Tax Equity Market Dynamics” panel....

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 13, 2025

Oil & gas companies continue to identify and capitalize on opportunities related to the deployment of new energy technologies, with their approaches broadly
maturing and coalescing around maximizing synergies, leveraging available subsidies and responding to regulatory drivers.
...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 11, 2025

On January 30, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) approved a Stipulation and Consent Agreement (Agreement)
between the Office of Enforcement (OE) and Stronghold Digital Mining Inc. (Stronghold) resolving an investigation into whether Stronghold had violated the
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) tariff and Commission regulations by limiting the quantity of energy made available to the market to serve a co-located
Bitcoin mining operation.1 This order appears to be the first instance of a public enforcement action involving co-located load and generation and comes at a
time when both FERC and market operators2 are scrutinizing the treatment of co-located load due to the rapid increase in demand associated with data
center development.
...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.