FERC NOPR Seeks Access to Additional Electric Reliability Data

Sep 25, 2015

Reading Time : 3 min

NERC is the Commission-certified Electric Reliability Organization under Section 215 of the Federal Power Act,1 which was enacted as part of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (“EPAct 2005”). Pursuant to that statute, NERC is charged with developing mandatory and enforceable reliability standards, subject to FERC review and approval. Section 215(d)(5) also gives FERC authority to direct NERC to develop a new or modified reliability standard to address a specific matter.2 In addition, Section 215(g) requires NERC to “conduct periodic assessments of the reliability and adequacy of the bulk-power system in North America.” 

In the NOPR, the Commission is proposing to amend its regulations to require NERC to make available to FERC and FERC staff, “on a nonpublic and ongoing basis,” the reliability information it collects from transmission and generation owners and places in three specific databases:

  • Transmission Availability Data System (TADS) – includes transmission outage data for bulk electric system AC and DC circuits, transmission-level transformers and bulk electric system AC/DC convertors
  • Generating Availability Data System (GADS) – contains generation outage data for most types of generating units with a capacity of 20 megawatts or larger, including event records documenting when, and to what extent, a generating unit could not produce power, and performance records summarizing monthly generation, attempted starts actual starts, and fuels
  • Protection System Misoperations Database – contains information on protection system misoperation events, including the equipment involved and the cause of the misoperation.

FERC asserts that access to the information in these databases is necessary to carry out the agency’s obligations under Section 215 of the Federal Power Act.  In particular, FERC argues that access to the databases is needed to “inform the Commission more quickly, directly and comprehensively about reliability trends or reliability gaps” that might require it to exercise its authority under Section 215(d)(5) to direct NERC to develop a new or modified reliability standard.  In addition, FERC contends that access to the information in the databases will help it better understand the periodic reliability assessments conducted by NERC pursuant to Section 215(g).

FERC’s proposal is likely to be met with concerns from NERC and industry that it signals an intent on the part of the Commission to more aggressively use its authority under Section 215(d)(5) to direct NERC to develop new or modified reliability standards.  Commissioner LaFleur acknowledged this potential concern in a concurring statement, noting that the statutory relationship between NERC and FERC is unique, vesting NERC with primary responsibility for developing reliability standards while giving FERC an oversight role.  While FERC has used its section 215(d)(5) authority in the past, industry has raised concerns that more frequent and aggressive use of that authority could upset the careful balance of roles between FERC and NERC that Congress envisioned.

In addition, while FERC does not suggest in the NOPR that it will use its access to the information in these three databases to support actions to enforce compliance with the mandatory reliability standards, there may also be concerns that the Commission will, in fact, do so. 

Finally, the proposal could raise confidentiality concerns for transmission and generation owners.  In particular, there could be concerns that information retrieved from these databases by FERC or FERC staff will be subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) or other authorities, or that such information could be inadvertently disclosed.  The Commission acknowledges these concerns in the NOPR and states that it will “take appropriate steps,” under FOIA and its own regulations, when handling such information.

Comments on the NOPR are due 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.    



1 16 U.S.C. § 824o.

2 FERC does not have authority to write reliability standards itself, however.  

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

July 8, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to ISO New England Inc. (ISO-NE) directing ISO-NE and ISO-NE participating transmission owners to show cause as to why ISO-NE’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (ISO New England Inc., 195 FERC ¶ 61,215 (2026) (Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 7, 2026

On June 29, 2026, the Supreme Court granted a petition for certiorari in Leonard Hoffmann v. WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. (Hoffmann), which presents the question whether section 7 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) requires pipeline companies using federal eminent domain authority to pay landowners’ attorney’s fees in states where landowners can recover those fees under state law. In the decision giving rise to the Supreme Court’s review, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that a group of ranchers were not entitled to recover their $383,300 in attorney’s fees incurred while negotiating their compensation—creating a circuit split with four other courts of appeals. Hoffmann will be heard during the Court’s October 2026 Term, and marks the second time in five years that the Court has agreed to interpret NGA section 7.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 6, 2026

On June 29, 2026, the United States Supreme Court issued Trump v. Slaughter, fundamentally reshaping presidential removal authority over independent regulatory agencies. The decision overruled a 90-year-old precedent established in Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, which had upheld the constitutionality of commissioner removal protections in the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act). As written, the FTC Act permits a commissioner’s removal “only for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.” In Slaughter, the Court was asked to reevaluate this standard following the President’s removal of a Democratic-appointed FTC commissioner from office in 2025 without cause. Finding for the President, the Court held that removal was permissible because the FTC Act’s for-cause removal protections for commissioners violate the separation of powers, specifically, the President’s removal power under Article II. The Court explained that the FTC exercises executive power because it promulgates binding rules, investigates and enforces those rules through administrative adjudications, and brings civil enforcement actions in federal court. It found that because it exercises these executive powers, its commissioners “must therefore be controlled by the Chief Executive, in whom such power is vested.” While previous recent cases addressing the scope of the Removal Power, Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Collins v. Yellen purported to preserve some kernel of Humphrey’s, the Court made clear that “[i]f anything more is left of Humphrey’s, we overrule it.”

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 25, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to the California Independent System Operator Corporation (CAISO) directing CAISO and CAISO transmission owners to show cause as to why CAISO’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (California Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., 195 FERC ¶ 61,214 (2026) (the Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.