Betting Against the House (and Senate): The Green New Deal

Feb 13, 2019

Reading Time : 1 min

Among the proposals are commitments to meet 100 percent of U.S. power demand from clean, renewable and zero-emission energy sources, including through smart power grids, and ensuring new and existing buildings achieve the highest levels of energy efficient construction. The Green New Deal seeks collaboration with the manufacturing and farming communities to support climate-friendly revitalization initiatives. The Deal strives to reduce emissions from the transportation sector to zero, including investments in public transportation and high-speed rail. It also encourages the research and development of new technologies to advance climate actions and promotes education and job training opportunities for vulnerable communities across the United States.

Notably, the Green New Deal in its current form is simply a Congressional resolution or declaration of intent, not draft legislation. Passage of the resolution in any regard is improbable given responses from both sides of the aisle. The Deal is drawing criticism, not only for its ambitious climate goals, but also for its provisions related to universal access to health care and clean water, as well as assuring worker collective bargaining rights. 

Despite the wall of opposition that will face passage of the Deal’s comprehensive reforms, the Green New Deal is already garnering significant press, and stacking up high-profile proponents, such as Sens. Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Cory Booker and Amy Klobuchar, ensuring that climate change will be a key issue in the Democratic presidential primaries. Moreover, the Deal likely will spur conversations among corporate management and boards of directors. Indeed, given the increased role that the private sector is taking on climate issues since the Paris Climate Conference in 2015, and increased interest in environmental action by consumers, shareholders, and other key stakeholders such as state and local governments, aspects of the Green New Deal may prevail even in the absence of federal action.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

December 21, 2025

On December 19, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued its much-anticipated order on show cause proceeding concerning the co-location of generation and load within the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) market.[1] In the order, the Commission finds that PJM’s tariff is unjust and unreasonable because it does not provide sufficient clarity on the rates, terms, and conditions of service applicable to generators serving Co-Located Load and does not include transmission services appropriate for customers that are willing and able to limit their use of the transmission system in certain conditions. 

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

November 25, 2025

We are pleased to share the program materials and a recording of Akin’s recently presented webinar, “Navigating the Evolving Landscape of Corporate PPAs.”

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

November 12, 2025

On November 7, 2025, the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) reversed their prior positions and approved Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 401 Water Quality Certifications and other environmental permits for the Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Company’s (Transco) Northeast Supply Enhancement Project (NESE). NESE is a 25-mile natural gas pipeline expansion project certificated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) that is intended to deliver 400,000 dekatherms per day of natural gas produced in Pennsylvania to local distribution company customers in New York City through new facilities in Middlesex County, New Jersey and an underwater segment traversing the Raritan and Lower New York Bays.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

November 6, 2025

The market for the direct procurement of energy by commercial and industrial buyers has been active in the U.S. for a decade.  In years past, buyers often engaged in such purchases on a voluntary basis to achieve their goals to use renewable energy.  These days, C&I buyers are turning to direct procurement or self-supply to obtain a reliable source of energy.  Sufficient and accessible energy from a local utility may not be available or may be materially delayed or trigger significant capital costs.  This is a material change driven in part by increased demand for electricity, including demand from data centers, EV infrastructure and industrial development.       

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.