House Passes Legislation to Lift Nearly 40 Year Ban on Crude Oil Exports

Oct 12, 2015

Reading Time : 2 min

Prior to House action, the Office of Management and Budget issued a Statement of Administration Policy (SAP) on October 7, 2015, on behalf of the Obama administration, indicating that it “strongly opposes H.R. 702.” The SAP further states,

“[l]egislation to remove crude export restrictions is not needed at this time. Rather, Congress should be focusing its efforts on supporting our transition to a low-carbon economy. It could do this through a variety of measures, including ending the billions of dollars a year in Federal subsidies provided to oil companies and instead investing in wind, solar, energy efficiency, and other clean technologies to meet America’s energy needs.”

It concludes by stating that, if H.R. 702 were presented to the president in its current form, senior advisors would recommend that the president veto the measure.

Thus, despite the margin of passage in the House, legislation to lift the ban faces strong headwinds in the Senate, where 60 votes will be necessary for passage, and where many Senate Democrats will support the administration’s position. Nevertheless, some Democrats, including Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and even presidential candidate Hillary Clinton (D-NY), have suggested a potential for a compromise approach that would pair lifting the ban on crude exports with policies that would benefit clean and renewable energy. Indeed, the administration’s SAP joins these issues to some extent also.

In July, the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources approved Committee Chairman Lisa Murkowski’s (R-AK) Offshore Production and Energizing National Security Act of 2015 (S.2011). Additionally, the Senate Banking Committee recently approved a second bill, the American Crude Oil Export Equality Act (S. 1372), which would also lift the export ban. S. 1372 is sponsored by Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND) with support from Sen. Murkowski. In addition to lifting the ban, S. 1372 would give the president authority to impose restrictions on crude exports, such as licensing requirements, in the event of national emergencies or crude oil shortages.

Finally, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has publicly remarked that he was discussing the issue of the crude oil export ban with the administration.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

February 10, 2026

The global energy sector enters 2026 amid major policy shifts, geopolitical tension and evolving market dynamics. The Trump administration’s reversal of Biden-era climate initiatives and renewed emphasis on domestic production have reshaped the policy landscape, offering a more favorable regulatory environment even as conflicts abroad, oil price volatility and shifting trade policies tempered deal activity through 2025.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

January 22, 2026

On January 16, 2026, the National Energy Dominance Council (NDEC) and governors from each of the 13 states in PJM issued a Statement of Principles urging PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) to hold an emergency backstop auction and take other measures to support the entry of new capacity to preserve the reliability of the PJM region. The Statement of Principles calls on PJM to expeditiously file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) tariff revisions that would overhaul aspects of PJM’s market rules to address rising electricity prices and growing reliability risks in the PJM region. The Statement of Principles comes at a time of growing concern that PJM will not have sufficient capacity in the coming years to meet demand due to the retirement of existing generation resources, the glacial pace of new entry and projected increased demand associated with data center development.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

December 21, 2025

On December 19, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued its much-anticipated order on show cause proceeding concerning the co-location of generation and load within the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) market.[1] In the order, the Commission finds that PJM’s tariff is unjust and unreasonable because it does not provide sufficient clarity on the rates, terms, and conditions of service applicable to generators serving Co-Located Load and does not include transmission services appropriate for customers that are willing and able to limit their use of the transmission system in certain conditions. 

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

November 25, 2025

We are pleased to share the program materials and a recording of Akin’s recently presented webinar, “Navigating the Evolving Landscape of Corporate PPAs.”

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.