Mexico's Energy Industry: Midstream Regulations

Aug 3, 2015

Reading Time : 5 min

These Midstream Regulations’ main goals are (i) to provide open, nondiscriminatory access to existing transportation and storage infrastructure and (ii) to establish a legal framework that will promote the development of the midstream market. They will apply equally to all new or existing pipeline and storage operators, regardless whether they are State-Owned or private companies, foreign or Mexican. Overall, the Regulations provide the CRE vast authority to regulate the Mexican midstream sector to complete the transition from a state-owned and operated monopoly to a competitive and vibrant market-driven industry. Moreover, Petroleos Mexicanos is required to carry out a complete inventory of all its midstream assets and present market-driven Terms and Conditions for all its Transportation Systems and Storage Facilities within 90-days from the final publication of the Midstream Regulations.

The following summary presents some of the more relevant aspects of the Midstream Regulations including a clear distinction between transportation and storage, different midstream service modalities, cap on Carriers’ Reserved Capacity, open seasons, interconnectivity, expansion/extension, quality banks, guidelines for Carriers to prepare their Terms and Conditions, and their Rates/Tariffs schemes.

Services

Transportation
Scope: Includes (i) reception of petroleum and petrochemicals (P&P) at a designated entry point; (ii) their shipment through the pipelines; (iii) measurement and analysis of the quantity and quality of P&P; and (iv) delivery at a designated exit point.

 

Components: Transportation Systems may include “buffer facilities” like temporary storage or processing tanks as long as these buffer facilities are directly and exclusively necessary for the transportation of P&P. Buffer facilities cannot be used only for storage purposes and their capacity must reflect the “temporary” requirement.

Carriers:

  • Must obtain a Transportation Permit from the CRE. The Permit shall include the Terms and Conditions (“TCPS”) for the Transportation System (similar to the Rules Tariff in the U.S.).
  • Must limit their “corporate purpose” to the transportation of hydrocarbons.
  • Must provide (i) Firm Commitment Services and (ii) Open Access Services.
  • May only transport a limited quantity of their own P&P thorough their Transportation System.
  • Must certify the Transportation System’s Capacity, Firm Commitment Capacity, Available Capacity and Open Access Capacity (if any).

Storage:
Scope: Includes (i) reception of P&P at a designated point for storage or depository purposes; (ii) measurement and analysis of the quantity and quality of P&P; (iii) any processing and mixing necessary to meet necessary quality standards; and (iv) delivery at a designated point.

Storage Providers:

  • Must obtain a Storage Permit from the CRE. The Permit shall include TCPS for the Storage Facilities (similar to the Rules Tariff in the U.S.).
  • Must limit their “corporate purpose” to the storage of hydrocarbons.
  • Must provide (i) Firm Commitment Services and (ii) Open Access Services.
  • May only store a limited quantity of their own P&P in their Storage Facilities.
  • Must certify the Storage Facility’s Capacity, Firm Commitment Capacity, Available Capacity and Open Access Capacity (if any).

Service Formats

Firm Commitment
As a general rule, transportation and storage services of P&P will be offered under a Firm Commitment scheme, whereby Shippers enter into medium to long term fixed volume and frequency agreements with Carriers and Storage Providers (Midstream Companies). The Firm Commitment scheme has priority over the Open Access or Common Use schemes because it allows Shipper to guaranty capacity and access to the Transportation System and Storage Facilities.

 

Open Access
Midstream Companies must include in their TCPS the necessary conditions to guaranty open access to all the services they provide. Shippers interested in hiring P&P transportation and storage services must send an application to the corresponding Mistream Company, who must provide a formal response within 30 days. Midstream Companies may only deny requested services when there is no Available Capacity or it is determined that the service request is not technically feasible. If the Shipper believes Midstream Companies are not providing open, non-discriminatory access to their Systems/Facilities, they may file a complaint with the CRE.

 

Common Use
Midstream Companies may offer P&P transportation and storage services based on the Common Use scheme together with the Firm Commitment and Open Access schemes. Midstream Companies may allot a percentage of their Available Capacity to provide services on a pro-rata basis which must include the following considerations: (i) Shipper’s historic volume profile; (ii) regularity or frequency of services provided to Shipper; (iii) Shipper’s nomination requirements; and (iv) minimum work commitments, among others. Midstream Companies may offer Unconfirmed Capacity under the Firm Commitment scheme to Common Use Shippers.

Main Characteristics

Rates/Tariffs
The CRE will determine, based on the existing market conditions for a particular Transportation System or Storage Facility, whether it will establish a maximum rate/tariff. If market conditions indicate there will be a competitive environment, no maximum rates/tariffs will be established. Otherwise, the CRE will impose maximum rate/tariff schemes to protect Shippers and mitigate any anticompetitive practices. The CRE will evaluate the Midstream Companies’ rates/tariffs based on the following: operating, sunk and recoverable costs; likely Shippers’ characteristics; current market conditions; operating efficiency; reasonable risk allocation between Shippers and Midstream Companies; and adequate profitability, among others.

Batching
Midstream Companies may offer Batching services based on P&P’s quality and specifications. Any additional requirements, quality ranges and costs involved in Batching must be included in the Permit Terms and Conditions.

Open Season
Midstream Companies must hold Open Seasons every time they have Permanent Available Capacity, get a new Transportation/Storage Permit, decide to build new or expand existing pipelines and storage facilities, or are asked by Shippers to build or expand existing pipelines and storage facilities. Open Seasons will help identify interested parties, scope of services required and the characteristics of the TCPS.

Quality Banks
Midstream Companies may establish quality banks to identify and compensate for any discrepancies in the quality of the P&P introduced vs. received. Any quality bank provisions must be included in the TCPS.

Interconnection
Carriers must facilitate Shipper’s interconnection to their Transportation System by providing technical support and paying for such interconnection. All interconnection-related costs can be incorporated into the transportation rates. Interconnection is limited to a maximum distance of 100 meters from the existing Transportation System; otherwise it would be considered an expansion/extension.

Expansion and Extension
Midstream Companies may enter into investment/development agreements with Shippers to expand or extend existing Systems/Facilities to cover Shippers’ needs. Midstream Companies should establish terms and conditions under which they will agree to such agreements. Otherwise, Shippers may undertake the expansion or extension, apply independently for a Permit and request interconnection with the existing Transportation System.

Electronic Bulletin
Midstream Companies must create Electronic Bulletins for all Systems/Facilities. They will have to post the following information: System/Facility Capacity, Firm Commitment Capacity, Available Capacity, Open Access Capacity, TCPS, Open Seasons, existing Transportation and Storage Agreements, among other relevant matters.

Capacity Assignment/Transfer
Shippers may assign or transfer the Firm Commitment capacity they have acquired. If any Firm Commitment capacity goes unused for a long period of time, Shipper will be forced to forgo or sell it.

Title
Shippers must certify to the Midstream Companies that the P&P they are putting in the System/Facility is free of liens or encumbrances, and that they are the rightful owners. The P&P may not be sold, assigned or transferred while in transit.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

August 15, 2025

On August 8, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued an enforcement order in Skye MS, LLC (Skye) and levied a $45,000 civil penalty on an intrastate pipeline operator in Mississippi, resolving an investigation into the operator’s violations of section 311 (Section 311) of the Natural Gas Policy Act (NGPA). FERC faulted the operator for providing a Section 311 transportation service without timely filing a Statement of Operating Conditions (SOC) and obtaining FERC’s approval for the transportation rates. Section 311 permits intrastate pipelines to transport interstate gas “on behalf of” interstate pipelines without becoming subject to FERC’s more extensive Natural Gas Act (NGA) jurisdiction, but requires the intrastate pipeline to have an SOC stating the rates and terms and conditions of service on file with FERC within 30 days of providing the interstate service. Under the NGPA, Section 311 rates must be “fair and equitable” and approved by FERC. In Skye, FERC stated that the operator began providing Section 311 service on certain pipeline segments in Mississippi in May 2023, following their acquisition from another Section 311 operator, but did not file an SOC with FERC until April 2025. The order ties the penalty to the approximately two-year delay between commencement of the Section 311 service and the SOC filing date. The pipeline operator was also ordered to provide an annual compliance report and to abide by additional verification requirements related to the filing of its FERC Form No. 549D, the Quarterly Transportation & Storage Report for Intrastate Natural Gas and Hinshaw Pipelines.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

August 6, 2025

In Sierra Club v. FERC, No. 24-1199 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 1, 2025), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) upheld the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) approval of a 1,000-foot natural gas pipeline segment crossing the United States-Mexico border (the Border Pipeline) under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), rejecting environmental groups’ challenges that FERC improperly limited its analysis under both the NGA and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as related to a 155-mile intrastate “Connector Pipeline” constructed upstream of the Border Pipeline in Texas.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 17, 2025

On July 15, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) issued an order1 proposing to eliminate the soft price cap of $1,000 per megawatt-hour (MWh) for bilateral spot sales in the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) that was implemented following the California energy crisis. If adopted, the Commission’s proposal would eliminate the requirement that sellers make a filing with FERC cost justifying spot market sales in excess of the soft price cap, which have become increasingly common in recent years as market conditions have continued to tighten throughout the West. Eliminating the WECC soft price cap would provide sellers that make sales during periods when prices exceed the cap greater certainty that their sales will not be second guessed after the fact.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 25, 2025

On June 4–5, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) hosted a commissioner-led technical conference to discuss resource adequacy challenges facing regional transmission organizations and independent system operators (RTO). The conference is a response to the growing concern that multiple RTO regions across the country may not have sufficient supply available in the coming years to meet demand due to resource retirements, the pace of new generation entry and higher load growth arising from the construction of data centers and reindustrialization.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 12, 2025

We are pleased to share the presentation slide deck and a recording of Akin’s recently presented webinar, “Navigating U.S. Policy Shifts in the Critical Minerals Sector.”

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 10, 2025

On June 4, 2025, the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) announced revisions to its procedures for pipeline safety enforcement actions. The changes, outlined in two new policy memoranda from PHMSA’s Office of the Chief Counsel (PHC), aim to enhance due process protections for pipeline operators by clarifying how civil penalties are calculated and expanding the disclosure of agency records in enforcement proceedings.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

May 22, 2025

On May 19, 2025, the Department of Energy (DOE) finalized its 2024 LNG Export Study: Energy, Economic and Environmental Assessment of U.S. LNG Exports (the 2024 Study) through the release of a Response to Comments on the 2024 Study. The Response to Comments concludes that the 2024 Study, as augmented through public comments submitted on or before March 20, 2025, supporting a finding that liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports serve the public interest. With the comment process complete, DOE will move forward with final orders on pending applications to export LNG to non-free trade agreement (non-FTA) countries.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

May 20, 2025

On Thursday, May 15, the Senate Commerce, Science & Transportation Subcommittee on Surface Transportation, Freight, Pipelines and Safety held a hearing titled, “Pipeline Safety Reauthorization: Ensuring the Safe and Efficient Movement of American Energy.” The hearing examined legislative priorities for reauthorizing the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA).

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.