Passing of Senate’s Energy Bill Signals a Renewed Focus on Cybersecurity of Power Grid

May 11, 2016

Reading Time : 2 min

By: Shawn Whites (paralegal), David S. Turetsky, Visiting Professor, College of Emergency Preparedness, Homeland Security, and Cybersecurity at the University of Albany

The Act amends Part II of the Federal Power Act to provide the secretary of the Department of Energy (DOE), under direction from the President, with the authority to order “any entity that is registered with the [North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC)] as an owner, operator, or user of the bulk-power system to take such actions as the secretary determines will best avert or mitigate” cybersecurity threats.1  In carrying out such an order, the secretary is required under the Act to coordinate with Canada and Mexico on interconnection issues that might arise as a result of the cybersecurity threat, as well as consult with various affected parties (grid operators and generators; NERC; the Electricity Subsector Coordinating Council; and federal and state agencies).  Taking into account the added costs that electric utilities and generators might face due to an emergency order, the Act directs the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to adopt regulations that permit affected parties to “seek recovery of prudently incurred costs” from their ratepayers.

Like other provisions of the Act focused on channeling investments in modern grid technologies and infrastructure, the Act directs $100 million worth of funding per year from 2017 to 2025 towards four separate DOE-led programs designed to (i) advance cybersecurity applications and technologies for the energy sector; (ii) identify vulnerabilities of energy sector supply chain products to known cybersecurity threats; (iii) enhance the emergency response capabilities of the DOE and expand cooperation of the DOE with the intelligence communities for energy‑sector-related threat collection and analysis; (iv) and secure energy networks, including electric, natural gas and oil exploration, transmission and delivery.

Finally, the Act exempts critical electric infrastructure information (CEII) from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act,2 directs FERC to work with the DOE to issue such orders and regulations regarding the proper sharing and designation of CEII, and designates the DOE as the sector-specific agency for cybersecurity for the energy sector.


1 The Act defines a cyber security threat as the “imminent danger of an act that severely disrupts, attempts to severely disrupt, or poses a significant risk of severely disrupting the operation of programmable electronic devices or communications networks (including hardware, software, and data) essential to the reliable operation of the bulk-power system.”

2 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(3).

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

February 10, 2026

The global energy sector enters 2026 amid major policy shifts, geopolitical tension and evolving market dynamics. The Trump administration’s reversal of Biden-era climate initiatives and renewed emphasis on domestic production have reshaped the policy landscape, offering a more favorable regulatory environment even as conflicts abroad, oil price volatility and shifting trade policies tempered deal activity through 2025.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

January 22, 2026

On January 16, 2026, the National Energy Dominance Council (NDEC) and governors from each of the 13 states in PJM issued a Statement of Principles urging PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) to hold an emergency backstop auction and take other measures to support the entry of new capacity to preserve the reliability of the PJM region. The Statement of Principles calls on PJM to expeditiously file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) tariff revisions that would overhaul aspects of PJM’s market rules to address rising electricity prices and growing reliability risks in the PJM region. The Statement of Principles comes at a time of growing concern that PJM will not have sufficient capacity in the coming years to meet demand due to the retirement of existing generation resources, the glacial pace of new entry and projected increased demand associated with data center development.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

December 21, 2025

On December 19, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued its much-anticipated order on show cause proceeding concerning the co-location of generation and load within the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) market.[1] In the order, the Commission finds that PJM’s tariff is unjust and unreasonable because it does not provide sufficient clarity on the rates, terms, and conditions of service applicable to generators serving Co-Located Load and does not include transmission services appropriate for customers that are willing and able to limit their use of the transmission system in certain conditions. 

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

November 25, 2025

We are pleased to share the program materials and a recording of Akin’s recently presented webinar, “Navigating the Evolving Landscape of Corporate PPAs.”

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.