PJM Adds New Notification Requirements for Certain “Change-in-Ownership Transactions”

Jul 18, 2018

Reading Time : 5 min

In general, the new requirements should not be particularly onerous because most of the required information should be readily accessible. However, compliance could require advanced planning and information-gathering, especially for Change-in-ownership Transactions that do not require Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) authorization under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act (FPA)3 but are still subject to the new requirements.

New Requirements for Change-in-Ownership Transactions

PJM’s new requirements for Change-in-ownership Transactions apply to Generation Owners, which are PJM Members (i.e., signatories to the PJM Operating Agreement) that own or lease generation facilities in PJM.4 New Section 2.2.1 of PJM Manual 14D (Generator Operational Requirements) states that “[e]ach Generation Interconnection Customer (for a new generation facility or an existing generation facility) and Generation Owner (collectively referred to . . . as ‘Generation Owner’) seeking to, directly or indirectly, transfer all or part of its ownership interests in its generation facility must notify PJM” and comply with the other processes now set forth in Manual 14D.5 Specifically, PJM’s new requirements apply to “an asset transfer of a generation facility, the transfer of an entity that owns or controls a generation facility (which shall mean 10% or more of voting interest of the entity), and to upstream transfers of ownership interests (10% or more voting interests) in such an entity.”6 The requirements also apply to corporate reorganizations that are not blanket-authorized under Section 203 of the FPA.7

1. Expanded Service of Section 203 Applications

New Section 2.2.1 of Manual 14D requires that the public Section 203 application for a Change-in-ownership Transaction “be served promptly” on the General Counsel of PJM and the General Counsel of Monitoring Analytics LLC, the Independent Market Monitor for PJM.8 Section 2.2.1 does not define “promptly,” but applicants should have little difficulty complying with this requirement on the day that they file with FERC or within a day or two after doing so.

2. Provision of “Supplemental Information”

Generation Owners must also provide certain “supplemental information” to PJM’s Client Management Department, whether or not the transaction requires Section 203 authorization. Specifically, not later than ten days after (i) the filing of a Section 203 application or (ii) if the transaction does not require Section 203 authorization, the date that “binding transaction documents are executed (even if those documents contain conditions or contingencies),” the Generation Owner must “use commercially reasonable efforts” to provide the following to PJM’s Client Management Department:9

  • “Any service agreements relating to the generation facility including but not limited to any construction service agreement, cost responsibility agreement, Interconnection Service Agreement (or pre-PJM interconnection agreement), Wholesale [M]arket Participation Agreement, and any other PJM service agreement involving the Generation Owner related to the subject generation facility;”
  • “The facility’s name, location, street address, points of interconnection, maximum facility output, name(s) of the facility owner(s) . . . , PJM Market’s Gateway Unit ID, [and] PJM-assigned commercial name(s) . . . if applicable;”
  • “A brief description of the transaction including the names of the parties to the transaction;”
  • “The marketing entity that is currently responsible for the generation facility and Declaration of Authority to such marketing entity;” and
  • “If as a result of the transfer, [the] Generation Owner will become affiliated with or controlled by a different PJM Member, the name of such PJM Member and simplified organization chart illustrating the expected relationship between: (1) the Generation Owner; and (2) such PJM Member.”10

3. Identification/Documentation of “New Third-Party Marketers”

Where a Change-in-ownership Transaction involves a “new third-party marketer to interface with PJM,” the Generation Owner “shall provide the PJM Client Management Department with an executed PJM-accepted Declaration of Authority for the generation facility authorizing a new third-party marketer to interface with PJM” not later than three business days before the “requested effective date of the transfer within the PJM systems, which can be different than the closing of the Change-in-ownership Transaction.”11

4. Additional Requirements for Direct Transfers

For a direct sale or transfer of a generation facility, the Generation Owner must also provide PJM’s Client Management Department with the following not later than five business days before closing:

  • “A letter to the currently-effective President and CEO of PJM . . . on the entity’s letterhead identifying the new company name and the anticipated closing date;”
  • “A certificate of good standing from the acquiring entity’s state of organization;”
  • “A listing of the current officers of the acquiring entity;” and
  • “An IRS Form W9 for the acquiring entity.”12

Implications and Practice Pointers

First, while the new requirements apply directly to only Generation Owners, PJM expects all parties involved to work together as needed to provide the required information.13 Thus, indirect owners of, or investors in, generation facilities in PJM should expect to hear from transaction partners about these requirements and cooperate in providing required information.

Second, the new requirements “are in addition[] to and not in substitution of any contractual or PJM Tariff obligations” that otherwise apply.14 Thus, Generation Owners and Interconnection Customers and their owners should develop—if they do not already exist—and maintain compliance plans or other materials detailing the legal/regulatory requirements applicable to them to reduce the likelihood of inadvertent noncompliance.

Third, entities subject to the new requirements should contact PJM if compliance questions or concerns arise because “PJM may extend or waive any of [the] requirements if it determines that a Generation Owner’s compliance is not commercially practical.”15

Finally, despite the reference to “PJM’s review of a contemplated Change-in-ownership Transaction,”16 the new requirements seem unlikely to affect the timing of transactions. New Section 2.2.1 does not contemplate any PJM approval of, or other action on, information submitted in compliance with the new requirements. Thus, while compliance might require some additional effort and/or increase costs, the new requirements do not appear likely to materially affect transactions or the parties involved.


1 Capitalized terms used herein, unless otherwise defined, have the same meanings assigned to them in PJM Manual 14D, Revision 44, effective June 1, 2018, or the PJM Open Access Transmission Tariff, as applicable.

2 See PJM Manual 14D §§ 2.2, 2.3, and 5.7.

3 16 U.S.C. § 824b (2012).

4 PJM Manual 14D § 2.1.

5 Id. § 2.2.1.

6 Id.

7 Id. (referring to 18 C.F.R. § 33.1(c)(6) (2018)).

8 Id.

9 When Section 203 authorization is required, there is no separate notification requirement in connection with entering into the relevant “binding transaction documents.”

10 PJM Manual 14D § 2.2.1.

11 Id.

12 Id.

13 Id.

14 Id.

15 Id.

16 Id.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

March 10, 2026

Federal energy regulators are assuming expanded roles as the administration prioritizes energy dominance and infrastructure development to meet unprecedented power demand. FERC Chairman Laura Swett has vowed to expedite data center interconnections while addressing jurisdictional challenges, warning that unmet electricity demand could drive data centers abroad and create national security risks. The agency is processing pipeline applications faster than in prior years and considering blanket authorizations for certain LNG and hydroelectric projects to streamline approvals. 

Pipeline projects previously stalled by Clean Water Act permits are being revitalized, particularly in northeastern states where historically high electricity prices have increased openness to natural gas infrastructure. The Department of Energy is expanding its emergency authority to require retention of generation resources and has granted major LNG export approvals, signaling commitment to expanding U.S. export capacity under a streamlined framework that deprioritizes climate considerations.  

The Administration is bullish on the opportunities for the U.S. energy industry in Venezuela and eager to support companies willing to navigate the political risk inherent in the operations at the moment. Early meetings with President Trump and industry leaders showed the path forward may be longer and more complex than anticipated by the President. 

As permitting reforms advance and the pendulum swings toward fossil fuel favorability, the regulatory and policy landscape is fundamentally reshaping energy infrastructure development timelines and investment opportunities. 

Oil & Gas in 2026: Energy Policy & Regulation 

Delve into the complete regulatory & policy outlook at our Oil & Gas in 2026 report.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

March 3, 2026

Macroeconomic turbulence and volatile commodity markets significantly influenced oil & gas M&A activity throughout 2025, with deals showing renewed momentum only in the year's second half.  

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 24, 2026

On February 19, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued an order rescinding the soft price cap for bilateral spot market energy sales in the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) region.1 As previously covered, on July 15, 2025, FERC initiated a Federal Power Act Section 206 proceeding following the D.C. Circuit’s decision finding that FERC must apply the Mobile-Sierra public interest standard before ordering refunds for above-cap bilateral sales and vacating FERC’s orders requiring refunds for certain bilateral spot market transactions in the WECC region that exceeded the $1,000 MWh soft price cap.2 FERC’s Order follows through on the proposal it made last July to eliminate the WECCs soft price cap and marks a recognition that Western wholesale markets have evolved over the past two decades to become sufficiently competitive to render the soft price cap unnecessary.  

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 23, 2026

The oil & gas industry is experiencing a fundamental transformation in how companies access and deploy capital in 2026. Despite strong balance sheets and robust free cash flow generation, the sector is witnessing strategic shifts in funding sources and investment priorities that signal a new era of capital allocation.

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.