PJM Adds New Notification Requirements for Certain “Change-in-Ownership Transactions”

Jul 18, 2018

Reading Time : 5 min

In general, the new requirements should not be particularly onerous because most of the required information should be readily accessible. However, compliance could require advanced planning and information-gathering, especially for Change-in-ownership Transactions that do not require Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) authorization under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act (FPA)3 but are still subject to the new requirements.

New Requirements for Change-in-Ownership Transactions

PJM’s new requirements for Change-in-ownership Transactions apply to Generation Owners, which are PJM Members (i.e., signatories to the PJM Operating Agreement) that own or lease generation facilities in PJM.4 New Section 2.2.1 of PJM Manual 14D (Generator Operational Requirements) states that “[e]ach Generation Interconnection Customer (for a new generation facility or an existing generation facility) and Generation Owner (collectively referred to . . . as ‘Generation Owner’) seeking to, directly or indirectly, transfer all or part of its ownership interests in its generation facility must notify PJM” and comply with the other processes now set forth in Manual 14D.5 Specifically, PJM’s new requirements apply to “an asset transfer of a generation facility, the transfer of an entity that owns or controls a generation facility (which shall mean 10% or more of voting interest of the entity), and to upstream transfers of ownership interests (10% or more voting interests) in such an entity.”6 The requirements also apply to corporate reorganizations that are not blanket-authorized under Section 203 of the FPA.7

1. Expanded Service of Section 203 Applications

New Section 2.2.1 of Manual 14D requires that the public Section 203 application for a Change-in-ownership Transaction “be served promptly” on the General Counsel of PJM and the General Counsel of Monitoring Analytics LLC, the Independent Market Monitor for PJM.8 Section 2.2.1 does not define “promptly,” but applicants should have little difficulty complying with this requirement on the day that they file with FERC or within a day or two after doing so.

2. Provision of “Supplemental Information”

Generation Owners must also provide certain “supplemental information” to PJM’s Client Management Department, whether or not the transaction requires Section 203 authorization. Specifically, not later than ten days after (i) the filing of a Section 203 application or (ii) if the transaction does not require Section 203 authorization, the date that “binding transaction documents are executed (even if those documents contain conditions or contingencies),” the Generation Owner must “use commercially reasonable efforts” to provide the following to PJM’s Client Management Department:9

  • “Any service agreements relating to the generation facility including but not limited to any construction service agreement, cost responsibility agreement, Interconnection Service Agreement (or pre-PJM interconnection agreement), Wholesale [M]arket Participation Agreement, and any other PJM service agreement involving the Generation Owner related to the subject generation facility;”
  • “The facility’s name, location, street address, points of interconnection, maximum facility output, name(s) of the facility owner(s) . . . , PJM Market’s Gateway Unit ID, [and] PJM-assigned commercial name(s) . . . if applicable;”
  • “A brief description of the transaction including the names of the parties to the transaction;”
  • “The marketing entity that is currently responsible for the generation facility and Declaration of Authority to such marketing entity;” and
  • “If as a result of the transfer, [the] Generation Owner will become affiliated with or controlled by a different PJM Member, the name of such PJM Member and simplified organization chart illustrating the expected relationship between: (1) the Generation Owner; and (2) such PJM Member.”10

3. Identification/Documentation of “New Third-Party Marketers”

Where a Change-in-ownership Transaction involves a “new third-party marketer to interface with PJM,” the Generation Owner “shall provide the PJM Client Management Department with an executed PJM-accepted Declaration of Authority for the generation facility authorizing a new third-party marketer to interface with PJM” not later than three business days before the “requested effective date of the transfer within the PJM systems, which can be different than the closing of the Change-in-ownership Transaction.”11

4. Additional Requirements for Direct Transfers

For a direct sale or transfer of a generation facility, the Generation Owner must also provide PJM’s Client Management Department with the following not later than five business days before closing:

  • “A letter to the currently-effective President and CEO of PJM . . . on the entity’s letterhead identifying the new company name and the anticipated closing date;”
  • “A certificate of good standing from the acquiring entity’s state of organization;”
  • “A listing of the current officers of the acquiring entity;” and
  • “An IRS Form W9 for the acquiring entity.”12

Implications and Practice Pointers

First, while the new requirements apply directly to only Generation Owners, PJM expects all parties involved to work together as needed to provide the required information.13 Thus, indirect owners of, or investors in, generation facilities in PJM should expect to hear from transaction partners about these requirements and cooperate in providing required information.

Second, the new requirements “are in addition[] to and not in substitution of any contractual or PJM Tariff obligations” that otherwise apply.14 Thus, Generation Owners and Interconnection Customers and their owners should develop—if they do not already exist—and maintain compliance plans or other materials detailing the legal/regulatory requirements applicable to them to reduce the likelihood of inadvertent noncompliance.

Third, entities subject to the new requirements should contact PJM if compliance questions or concerns arise because “PJM may extend or waive any of [the] requirements if it determines that a Generation Owner’s compliance is not commercially practical.”15

Finally, despite the reference to “PJM’s review of a contemplated Change-in-ownership Transaction,”16 the new requirements seem unlikely to affect the timing of transactions. New Section 2.2.1 does not contemplate any PJM approval of, or other action on, information submitted in compliance with the new requirements. Thus, while compliance might require some additional effort and/or increase costs, the new requirements do not appear likely to materially affect transactions or the parties involved.


1 Capitalized terms used herein, unless otherwise defined, have the same meanings assigned to them in PJM Manual 14D, Revision 44, effective June 1, 2018, or the PJM Open Access Transmission Tariff, as applicable.

2 See PJM Manual 14D §§ 2.2, 2.3, and 5.7.

3 16 U.S.C. § 824b (2012).

4 PJM Manual 14D § 2.1.

5 Id. § 2.2.1.

6 Id.

7 Id. (referring to 18 C.F.R. § 33.1(c)(6) (2018)).

8 Id.

9 When Section 203 authorization is required, there is no separate notification requirement in connection with entering into the relevant “binding transaction documents.”

10 PJM Manual 14D § 2.2.1.

11 Id.

12 Id.

13 Id.

14 Id.

15 Id.

16 Id.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

November 12, 2025

On November 7, 2025, the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) reversed their prior positions and approved Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 401 Water Quality Certifications and other environmental permits for the Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Company’s (Transco) Northeast Supply Enhancement Project (NESE). NESE is a 25-mile natural gas pipeline expansion project certificated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) that is intended to deliver 400,000 dekatherms per day of natural gas produced in Pennsylvania to local distribution company customers in New York City through new facilities in Middlesex County, New Jersey and an underwater segment traversing the Raritan and Lower New York Bays.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

November 6, 2025

The market for the direct procurement of energy by commercial and industrial buyers has been active in the U.S. for a decade.  In years past, buyers often engaged in such purchases on a voluntary basis to achieve their goals to use renewable energy.  These days, C&I buyers are turning to direct procurement or self-supply to obtain a reliable source of energy.  Sufficient and accessible energy from a local utility may not be available or may be materially delayed or trigger significant capital costs.  This is a material change driven in part by increased demand for electricity, including demand from data centers, EV infrastructure and industrial development.       

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 27, 2025

On October 23, 2025, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) directed the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to conduct a rulemaking to assert jurisdiction over load interconnections to the bulk electric transmission system and establish standardized procedures for the interconnection of large loads.1 The Directive included an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (ANOPR) that sets forth the legal justification for asserting jurisdiction over transmission-level load interconnections and fourteen principles that should inform FERC’s rulemaking process. The Secretary has directed FERC to take “final action” on the Directive no later than April 30, 2026.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 24, 2025

On October 21, 2025, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a final order (DOE/FECM Order No. 5264-A1) granting Venture Global CP2 LNG, LLC long-term authorization to export up to 1,446 billion cubic feet per year of domestically produced liquefied natural gas (LNG) from its Louisiana facility to countries without a free trade agreement with the United States (Non-FTA Countries). The final order follows a March 2025 Conditional Order,2 which issued while DOE was still completing its review of the agency’s 2024 LNG Export Study.3 The final order confirms that the project’s export volume and term authorization (through December 31, 2050) are unchanged, but provides for a three-year “make-up period” to allow export of any approved volume not shipped during the original term.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 9, 2025

On October 1, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued Order No. 914 amending certain Commission regulations to incorporate a conditional sunset date in compliance with the Trump administration’s April 2025 Executive Order, “Zero-Based Regulatory Budgeting to Unleash American Energy” (the EO).

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 8, 2025

Akin is pleased to serve as a gold sponsor for Infocast’s Energy Independence Summit in Houston, October 21-23. Energy partner Charlie Ofner will moderate the Macroeconomics of Domestic Energy Independence panel, projects & energy transition partner Shariff Barakat will lead Opportunities in US Manufacturing: How Big, How Fast, How FEOC?, and counsel Taha Qureshi will guide the discussion on Cornerstones for Energy Independence: Investing in Grid Security & Cybersecurity.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 6, 2025

As of October 6, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) continues to operate despite the lapse in appropriations that resulted in a government shutdown on October 1, 2025. While FERC receives appropriations from Congress, it primarily is self-funded through fees and charges obtained from the industries it regulates, offsetting its total costs. Hence, during prior government shutdowns in 2018 and 2013, the agency was able to continue operations. However, FERC published a plan for operating in the event of a lapse in appropriations on September 30, 2025, available here

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

September 8, 2025

On September 4, 2025, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee convened a hearing to consider the nominations of Laura Swett and David LaCerte to serve as commissioners at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission). Swett is a former FERC Staff that served as legal and policy advisor to former FERC Chairman Kevin McIntyre and Commission Bernard McNamee. LaCerte is an attorney in private practice that previously held positions at the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board and the Louisiana Department of Veterans Affairs.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.