Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Holds Hearing on Grid Reliability and Security

Apr 10, 2014

Reading Time : 2 min

The panelists also discussed the measures that have been undertaken since the Metcalf incident to increase awareness among law enforcement and first responders to threats to energy infrastructure. Several lawmakers inquired about the benefits of distributed generation in contributing to overall grid reliability - a benefit that NARUC President Honorable said needs to be balanced against the cost to other consumers and the impact on utilities. 

With sometimes spirited questioning from Senators Joseph Manchin (D-WV) and Robert Portman (R-OH), the tail end of the first panel focused on the effect of coal-fired retirements in PJM.  In response to questions by Senator Portman about the recent polar vortex, LaFleur affirmed that FERC must consider both reliability and price, and she stated that FERC needs to make sure that the rules for capacity markets are written correctly so that base load capacity “gets what it needs” to remain in service. Portman also expressed his desire for FERC to perform analyses for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concerning the impact of its regulations on generation retirements. Manchin cited the recent statement by American Electric Power Service Corp.’s (AEP) CEO that, during the recent polar vortex, 89 percent of the AEP coal units slated for retirement next year were called upon to keep the lights on.  He asked LaFleur whether FERC was picking winners and losers in the energy markets based on fuel source. LaFleur responded that FERC needs to be fuel-neutral, but is guided by reliability considerations.

The second panel continued to concentrate on the effect of retirements in PJM and whether sufficient infrastructure exists for gas-fired resources to perform the baseload function traditionally reserved for coal-fired and nuclear resources. The panelists included: Philip D. Moeller, FERC Commissioner; Michael J. Kormos, executive vice president-operations of PJM; Nicholas Akins, Chairman, President, and CEO, American Electric Power Service Corp.; Thad Hill, President and Chief Operating Officer, Calpine Corp.; Cheryl Roberto, Associate Vice President, Clean Energy, Environmental Defense Fund; and Jim Hunter, Utilities Director of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW).   

The general consensus of the panelists was that timing is critical.While natural gas is plentiful, there are transportation bottlenecks and inadequate infrastructure in areas, such as the Midwest, that have largely been dependent on coal. This infrastructure will take time to construct, while a significant number of coal-fired units will retire with the implementation of environmental regulations in a year. Kormos of PJM stated that the “reliability safety valve” contained in the EPA’s Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) rule was critical and similar provisions would be very important in future regulations issued by EPA. 

Senator Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) asked whether the FERC-jurisdictional capacity markets were performing as needed and whether changes were required, to which Moeller replied that FERC currently is considering these issues, but perhaps a higher value for on-site fuel sources might be necessary. Several questions were posed about the ability of FERC to provide “reliability must-run” (RMR) agreements to retiring units, yet witnesses, such as Hunter, pointed out that, without new legislation, generators operating pursuant to RMR agreements would be exposed to lawsuits and penalties for environmental noncompliance. 

Please click here for more information on the hearing. 

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

July 8, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to ISO New England Inc. (ISO-NE) directing ISO-NE and ISO-NE participating transmission owners to show cause as to why ISO-NE’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (ISO New England Inc., 195 FERC ¶ 61,215 (2026) (Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 7, 2026

On June 29, 2026, the Supreme Court granted a petition for certiorari in Leonard Hoffmann v. WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. (Hoffmann), which presents the question whether section 7 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) requires pipeline companies using federal eminent domain authority to pay landowners’ attorney’s fees in states where landowners can recover those fees under state law. In the decision giving rise to the Supreme Court’s review, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that a group of ranchers were not entitled to recover their $383,300 in attorney’s fees incurred while negotiating their compensation—creating a circuit split with four other courts of appeals. Hoffmann will be heard during the Court’s October 2026 Term, and marks the second time in five years that the Court has agreed to interpret NGA section 7.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 6, 2026

On June 29, 2026, the United States Supreme Court issued Trump v. Slaughter, fundamentally reshaping presidential removal authority over independent regulatory agencies. The decision overruled a 90-year-old precedent established in Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, which had upheld the constitutionality of commissioner removal protections in the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act). As written, the FTC Act permits a commissioner’s removal “only for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.” In Slaughter, the Court was asked to reevaluate this standard following the President’s removal of a Democratic-appointed FTC commissioner from office in 2025 without cause. Finding for the President, the Court held that removal was permissible because the FTC Act’s for-cause removal protections for commissioners violate the separation of powers, specifically, the President’s removal power under Article II. The Court explained that the FTC exercises executive power because it promulgates binding rules, investigates and enforces those rules through administrative adjudications, and brings civil enforcement actions in federal court. It found that because it exercises these executive powers, its commissioners “must therefore be controlled by the Chief Executive, in whom such power is vested.” While previous recent cases addressing the scope of the Removal Power, Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Collins v. Yellen purported to preserve some kernel of Humphrey’s, the Court made clear that “[i]f anything more is left of Humphrey’s, we overrule it.”

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 25, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to the California Independent System Operator Corporation (CAISO) directing CAISO and CAISO transmission owners to show cause as to why CAISO’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (California Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., 195 FERC ¶ 61,214 (2026) (the Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.