What’s Old Is New: The Trump Administration Weighs a Section 232 Redux on Crude Oil Imports

May 15, 2020

Reading Time : 2 min

Over the past several months, softening demand and declining prices have wreaked havoc on domestic crude oil producers. Members of Congress and industry participants have pleaded with the Trump administration for relief, including from import competition.

Recent reports indicate that the Trump administration may decide to utilize Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to investigate whether crude oil imports threaten to impair the national security. Although it has invoked Section 232 far more than its predecessors, a decision by the Trump administration to investigate crude oil imports under Section 232 would align with steps taken by previous administrations.

I. Section 232

Section 232 authorizes the President to take action to address imports of articles that threaten to impair the national security. Prior to any presidential action, the U.S. Department of Commerce will investigate the effects of such imports on the national security. In so doing, Commerce will consult with the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) and appropriate officers of the United States, as well as hold a hearing. The DOD will also provide Commerce with an assessment of the defense requirements of the article subject to investigation. Within 270 days of initiating the investigation, Commerce must submit a report to the President disclosing whether such imports threaten to impair the national security and recommending action.

Within 90 days of receiving the report, the President must decide whether he concurs with Commerce’s finding and “determine the nature and duration” of any action to eliminate any threat to the national security. Upon making a decision, the President has “no later than” 15 days to implement the action. The President may take a broad range of actions to address the imports, including the negotiation of a trade agreement that limits or restricts imports of the article at issue.

II. Previous Investigations

Since its enactment in 1962, the current administration and its predecessors have initiated a total of 33 investigations pursuant to Section 232, two of which remain ongoing. These investigations have addressed a broad range of products, from watches to antifriction bearings, from automobiles to mobile cranes. Previous administrations have investigated petroleum and crude oil imports on eight separate occasions, most recently in 1999. Each of these investigations resulted in a finding that such imports threaten to impair the national security, though not every affirmative finding has resulted in the imposition of a trade restriction. For example, in the 1970s and 1980s, Presidents Nixon, Carter and Reagan imposed various embargos and fees on the imports. But in the late 1980s and 1990s, Presidents Reagan and Clinton declined to impose any remedy.

III. What’s Next?

Since assuming office in 2017, the Trump administration has initiated seven investigations pursuant to Section 232, more than 20 percent of all such investigations initiated to date. Moreover, each of these investigations has concluded that imports of the articles at issue threaten to impair the national security. Bolstered by past practice, it stands to reason that an investigation of crude oil imports pursuant to Section 232 may pique the Trump administration’s interest, particularly as the COVID-19 outbreak and industry woes have resulted in double economic blows to domestic crude oil producers, their employees, and the communities across the United States that rely on them.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

March 10, 2026

Federal energy regulators are assuming expanded roles as the administration prioritizes energy dominance and infrastructure development to meet unprecedented power demand. FERC Chairman Laura Swett has vowed to expedite data center interconnections while addressing jurisdictional challenges, warning that unmet electricity demand could drive data centers abroad and create national security risks. The agency is processing pipeline applications faster than in prior years and considering blanket authorizations for certain LNG and hydroelectric projects to streamline approvals. 

Pipeline projects previously stalled by Clean Water Act permits are being revitalized, particularly in northeastern states where historically high electricity prices have increased openness to natural gas infrastructure. The Department of Energy is expanding its emergency authority to require retention of generation resources and has granted major LNG export approvals, signaling commitment to expanding U.S. export capacity under a streamlined framework that deprioritizes climate considerations.  

The Administration is bullish on the opportunities for the U.S. energy industry in Venezuela and eager to support companies willing to navigate the political risk inherent in the operations at the moment. Early meetings with President Trump and industry leaders showed the path forward may be longer and more complex than anticipated by the President. 

As permitting reforms advance and the pendulum swings toward fossil fuel favorability, the regulatory and policy landscape is fundamentally reshaping energy infrastructure development timelines and investment opportunities. 

Oil & Gas in 2026: Energy Policy & Regulation 

Delve into the complete regulatory & policy outlook at our Oil & Gas in 2026 report.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

March 3, 2026

Macroeconomic turbulence and volatile commodity markets significantly influenced oil & gas M&A activity throughout 2025, with deals showing renewed momentum only in the year's second half.  

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 24, 2026

On February 19, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued an order rescinding the soft price cap for bilateral spot market energy sales in the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) region.1 As previously covered, on July 15, 2025, FERC initiated a Federal Power Act Section 206 proceeding following the D.C. Circuit’s decision finding that FERC must apply the Mobile-Sierra public interest standard before ordering refunds for above-cap bilateral sales and vacating FERC’s orders requiring refunds for certain bilateral spot market transactions in the WECC region that exceeded the $1,000 MWh soft price cap.2 FERC’s Order follows through on the proposal it made last July to eliminate the WECCs soft price cap and marks a recognition that Western wholesale markets have evolved over the past two decades to become sufficiently competitive to render the soft price cap unnecessary.  

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 23, 2026

The oil & gas industry is experiencing a fundamental transformation in how companies access and deploy capital in 2026. Despite strong balance sheets and robust free cash flow generation, the sector is witnessing strategic shifts in funding sources and investment priorities that signal a new era of capital allocation.

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.