C. Brandon Rash

Partner

Areas of Focus

C. Brandon Rash

Partner

brandon.rash@akingump.com

Areas of Focus

Save as PDF

Share This Biography

Biography
  • Focuses on patent infringement litigation in federal district courts and at the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and post-grant proceedings at the PTAB.
  • Represents high-tech companies in a broad range of sectors, including electronics, medical devices, computer hardware and software, network communications, wireless and semiconductors.

Brandon has substantial experience in all aspects of patent litigation, from pre-litigation through trial and appeal. He has served as lead counsel in district court actions and ITC investigations. He has substantial experience in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA), known as the “Rocket Docket,” where he served as a law clerk to the Honorable Henry E. Hudson.

Brandon also has vast experience in post-grant proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). He has served as lead or backup counsel in over 40 inter partes review (IPR) proceedings. In addition, he regularly counsels clients in IP transactions, due diligence, strategic patent portfolio management and other IP-related matters.

Brandon specializes in complex electrical and computer-related technologies, including electronics, medical devices, computer hardware and software, internet and network communications, wireless communications, semiconductors and audio technologies, which are applicable across a broad range of emerging technology areas, such as 5G, Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), autonomous vehicles, streaming video services and digital assets.

While in law school, Brandon served as manuscripts editor of the University of Richmond Law Review. Before law school, he was a technical marketing engineer at National Semiconductor Corporation, where he was responsible for power management and wireless semiconductor products.

Representative Work
  • Represents Butterfly Network in a patent infringement action brought by FUJIFILM Sonosite in the District of Delaware involving seven patents related to ultrasound diagnostic hardware and software, and as lead counsel in related IPR proceedings.
  • Represents VIZIO in an ITC 337 proceeding brought by Maxell Holdings involving patent infringement claims related to smart television hardware and software technologies, as well as an IPR proceeding.
  • Represented Boston Scientific in a series of multi-front patent and trade secret litigations against Nevro relating to spinal cord stimulation technology in the District of Delaware. The cases involved affirmative patent and trade secret claims asserted by Boston Scientific, counterclaims for patent infringement asserted by Nevro and parallel petitions for inter partes review before the PTAB. The Court scheduled trials for October 2021, January 2023, and October 2023. The jury in the 2021 trial returned a verdict finding Nevro liable for patent infringement and awarding Boston Scientific $20 million in damages. The case settled in August 2022, prior to the next-scheduled trials.
  • Represented patent owner EnChroma in a declaratory judgment action brought by accused infringer Eyenavision in the Western District of Pennsylvania related to lenses used for color vision correction.
  • Represented petitioner Lectrosonics as lead counsel in IPR proceedings against Zaxcom related to wireless audio recording and processing technology.
  • Represented patent owner Signify (formerly known as Philips Lighting) as lead counsel in district court and ITC actions and inter partes review (IPR) proceedings against various companies related to light-emitting diode (LED) lighting devices, power supplies, and optics.
  • Represented petitioner Unified Patents as lead counsel in IPR proceedings against various patent owners related to Global Positioning System (GPS) location tracking devices, video and audio data compression, personal communications system transmission protocol, Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), short message service (SMS) messaging, telemetry applications, network bandwidth allocation and management, and public key cryptosystems.
  • Represented defendant United Bank in patent infringement action in the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) brought by Groove Digital, Inc. related to the delivery and display of digital content to computer systems, push notifications, and smartphone applet applications.
  • Represented United Technologies Corporation in district court and ITC actions and inter partes review (IPR) proceedings against Rolls-Royce plc and General Electric Company related to gas turbine engine technologies.
  • Represented defendant Verizon Services Corp. in patent infringement actions in the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) against various patent owners related to virtual local area networks (VLAN), Internet Protocol (IP) network, and Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) technologies.
  • Represented appellee Trading Technologies International, Inc. in an appeal to Federal Circuit (CAFC) against CQG, Inc. regarding a motion to stay district court litigation pending covered business method (CBM) review proceedings.
  • Represented defendant TouchType, Inc. d/b/a SwiftKey in a patent infringement action in the Southern District of California (SDCA) brought by WordLogic Corporation related to predictive text technology for computer systems, touch keyboard applications, and smartphone applet applications.
  • Represented defendant patent owner Asetek Danmark A/S in a declaratory judgment action in the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) brought by Asia Vital Components Co. related to liquid cooling systems for computer systems.
  • Represented respondent Realtek Semiconductor Corporation in ITC action brought by LSI Corporation related to IEEE 802.11 wireless local area network (WLAN) communication protocols.
  • Represented plaintiff Netscape Communications Corp. in patent infringement action in the EDVA against ValueClick, Inc. related to the HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP) and internet cookies.

Education
  • J.D., University of Richmond School of Law, magna cum laude, 2006

  • B.S.E.E., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1999

Clerkships
  • U.S.D.C., Eastern District of Virginia

Bar Admissions
  • District of Columbia

  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

  • Virginia

Recognitions
  • The Legal 500 US, Patents: Litigation (Full Coverage), 2020, 2022 and 2023.
  • The Legal 500 US, Patents: Litigation (International Trade Commission), 2020.
  • Awarded the AIPLA Past Presidents’ Award for academic achievements in the study of intellectual property law, 2006.
  • Inducted as a member of the McNeil Law Society, the University of Richmond School of Law’s honor society, 2005.
Affiliations and Public Service
  • American Intellectual Property Law Association
  • PTAB Bar Association
  • Virginia Bar Association
  • University of Richmond School of Law, Young Graduate Association Board of Directors (president, 2010-2012; vice president, 2009-2010)
Speeches and Publications
  • Presenter, “Electrical and Computer Patent Practice,” Patent Resources Group Advanced Courses, April 7-12, 2019.
  • Presenter, “Electrical & Computer Patent Practice,” Patent Resources Group Advanced Courses, April 15-20, 2018.
  • Presenter, “Electrical & Computer Patent Practice,” Patent Resources Group Advanced Courses, October 15-20, 2017.
  • Panelist, “Considering the Evolution of PTAB Practice,” Boston Patent Law Association’s Contested Matters PTAB Summit, September 14, 2017.
  • Presenter, “Electrical and Computer Patent Practice,” Patent Resources Group Advanced Courses, April 2-7, 2017.
  • Presenter, “Electrical & Computer Patent Practice,” Patent Resources Group Advanced Courses, October 19-25, 2016.
  • Presenter, “Important Concepts and Considerations in Advanced Biofuels Pathway Protection and Approval,” Advanced Biofuels Conference & Expo, October 26-28, 2015.

Insights and Achievements

          Related Content

          People

          Distinguished by our areas of focus, as a cohesive and integrated firm, we are defined by the caliber of our work, the responsiveness of our service and a culture that is rooted in collaboration and forward-thinking.

          We Also Recommend

          Loading...
          Loading...
          Loading...
          Loading...