Congress Joins FDA in Focusing on Food Dye Limitations

August 27, 2025

Reading Time : 2 min

Food dye reform has been an area of focus for the Trump administration as part of its Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) initiative, giving momentum to an effort the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had already started by banning Red No. 3 for use in food and ingested drugs. FDA has continued to prioritize this work by taking actions to phase out the use of synthetic dyes and move to natural dyes since calling for these changes earlier this year, as discussed in our previous blog on the related announcement by the administration.

In recent weeks, members of Congress have unveiled multiple pieces of legislation to reform how food dyes are regulated. Notably, on August 12, 2025, Ranking Member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee Representative Frank Pallone (D-NJ) introduced H.R. 4958, the Grocery Reform And Safety (GRAS) Act, which would make significant changes to how food additives (including food dyes) are regulated by FDA. The legislation also calls for regular safety reassessments of such substances and new resources in the form of industry user fees and by authorizing appropriations. More recently, on August 22, 2025, Representative Grace Meng (D-NY), a member of the Congressional Food Safety Caucus, introduced H.R. 5027, the Ban Harmful Food Dyes Act, a bill that would revoke the legal status of several synthetic color additives commonly used in food products. Specifically, the legislation targets dyes such as Red No. 40, Yellow No. 5, Blue No. 1 and Titanium Dioxide, proposing to deem them unsafe for use in or on food, and food containing them as adulterated under section 402(c) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).

While it is unlikely that Congress will take up either H.R. 4958 or H.R. 5027 in the coming days or months, the introduction of these bills demonstrates that the interest in making changes to how food dyes are regulated spans multiple administrations and some members of Congress. These latest legislative developments arrive amid growing state-level activity, with numerous states having taken steps to regulate food dyes. These developments are also occurring against the backdrop of an evolving public health conversation around food additive and ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and the anticipated release of the MAHA strategy called for in the MAHA EO issued earlier this year. Taken together, these dynamics underscore that food dye reform will continue to be an evolving policy space for the foreseeable future and FDA is likely to have congressional support in continuing to prioritize regulatory reform of food ingredients. 

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Eye on FDA

August 27, 2025

Food dye reform has been an area of focus for the Trump administration as part of its Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) initiative, giving momentum to an effort the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had already started by banning Red No. 3 for use in food and ingested drugs. FDA has continued to prioritize this work by taking actions to phase out the use of synthetic dyes and move to natural dyes since calling for these changes earlier this year, as discussed in our previous blog on the related announcement by the administration.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

August 12, 2025

Last week, former Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner David Kessler submitted a citizen petition urging FDA to revoke the generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status of refined carbohydrates used in industrial food processing. The petition follows FDA’s and the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) joint request for information (RFI) to establish a formal definition for ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and offers FDA a legal pathway to change the regulatory status of these ingredients.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

August 6, 2025

On August 6, 2025, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) became the latest governmental agency to confirm that fluoropolymers are both safe and necessary. After an independent safety review of fluoropolymers in medical devices showed no conclusive evidence of health issues, FDA concluded that fluoropolymers are “very unlikely to cause toxicity” because of molecular size and further that they are essential for medical devices to function. As a result, “FDA’s evaluation is that currently there is no reason to restrict their continued use in devices.” This announcement will be a source of relief to the device and diagnostics industries.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

July 25, 2025

On July 25, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), unveiled the highly anticipated joint request for information on ultra-processed foods (UPFs). Specifically, the administration is seeking information and data to help develop a uniform definition for UPFs in the U.S. food supply.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

July 22, 2025

Dr. George Tidmarsh has been selected to replace Dr. Jacqueline Corrigan-Curay as the director of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) at FDA as she prepares to retire from the agency. Dr. Tidmarsh is an adjunct professor of pediatrics and neonatology at Stanford University and is credited as having been involved in the development of several approved drugs. Until late May of this year, Dr. Tidmarsh was a member of the board of directors of Revelation Biosciences, a company engaged in developing an anti-inflammatory IV therapy. Among other roles and experiences he has had, he was a founding Co-Director of Stanford’s Master of Science in Translational Research and Applied Medicine (M-TRAM) program, and founded Horizon Pharma in 2005.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

July 16, 2025

Recently, it was reported that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is launching two cross-agency artificial intelligence (AI) councils. One AI council will be tasked with addressing how the agency uses AI internally and the other will focus on policy governing AI’s use in FDA-regulated products (reportedly pre-existing AI councils in various FDA divisions will continue to operate) (Politico Pro).

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

July 16, 2025

This week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted another color additive petition, approving the use of Gardenia (Genipin) in various food and beverage products. This marks the fourth naturally-derived color additive authorized for use in foods since FDA’s April announcement to phase out all petroleum-based synthetic dyes in food and transition to natural alternatives (read more here). Gardenia blue, derived from the fruit of the gardenia, a flowering evergreen, is now approved for use in sport drinks, flavored or enhanced non-carbonated water, fruit drinks and ades, ready-to-drink teas, hard candy and soft candy.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

July 10, 2025

This morning, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the publication of more than 200 decision letters, also known as complete response letters (CRLs), with plans to release more from the archives. The CRLs released today are associated with applications for drugs and biologics submitted for approval between 2020 and 2024 that have since been approved by the agency.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.