Congress Joins FDA in Focusing on Food Dye Limitations

August 27, 2025

Reading Time : 2 min

Food dye reform has been an area of focus for the Trump administration as part of its Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) initiative, giving momentum to an effort the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had already started by banning Red No. 3 for use in food and ingested drugs. FDA has continued to prioritize this work by taking actions to phase out the use of synthetic dyes and move to natural dyes since calling for these changes earlier this year, as discussed in our previous blog on the related announcement by the administration.

In recent weeks, members of Congress have unveiled multiple pieces of legislation to reform how food dyes are regulated. Notably, on August 12, 2025, Ranking Member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee Representative Frank Pallone (D-NJ) introduced H.R. 4958, the Grocery Reform And Safety (GRAS) Act, which would make significant changes to how food additives (including food dyes) are regulated by FDA. The legislation also calls for regular safety reassessments of such substances and new resources in the form of industry user fees and by authorizing appropriations. More recently, on August 22, 2025, Representative Grace Meng (D-NY), a member of the Congressional Food Safety Caucus, introduced H.R. 5027, the Ban Harmful Food Dyes Act, a bill that would revoke the legal status of several synthetic color additives commonly used in food products. Specifically, the legislation targets dyes such as Red No. 40, Yellow No. 5, Blue No. 1 and Titanium Dioxide, proposing to deem them unsafe for use in or on food, and food containing them as adulterated under section 402(c) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).

While it is unlikely that Congress will take up either H.R. 4958 or H.R. 5027 in the coming days or months, the introduction of these bills demonstrates that the interest in making changes to how food dyes are regulated spans multiple administrations and some members of Congress. These latest legislative developments arrive amid growing state-level activity, with numerous states having taken steps to regulate food dyes. These developments are also occurring against the backdrop of an evolving public health conversation around food additive and ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and the anticipated release of the MAHA strategy called for in the MAHA EO issued earlier this year. Taken together, these dynamics underscore that food dye reform will continue to be an evolving policy space for the foreseeable future and FDA is likely to have congressional support in continuing to prioritize regulatory reform of food ingredients. 

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Eye on FDA

April 1, 2026

On March 30, 2026, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a final guidance entitled “Incorporating Voluntary Patient Preference Information over the Total Product Life Cycle.” The guidance provides updated recommendations to industry and FDA on how and when voluntary patient preference information (PPI) may be considered by FDA staff in decision making relating to devices. PPI is not required for FDA’s consideration as part of FDA decision making, but FDA may find it valuable to consider patient viewpoints when the information meets applicable legal requirements. In addition, FDA encourages industry and other interested parties to consider patient experience data in device development and evaluation, including data relating to patient preferences for outcomes and treatments. FDA acknowledges that patient perspective and personal experiences can help FDA evaluate the benefit-risk profile of certain devices throughout the total product life cycle.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

March 24, 2026

On March 20, 2026, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the agency will hold a public hearing on the Commissioner’s National Priority Voucher (CNPV) Pilot Program, with a Federal Register notice soliciting public comment and scheduling a public hearing for June 12, 2026. As previously noted here and here, the program was announced in June 2025 for the purpose of providing select sponsors with a nontransferable voucher for enhanced engagement with FDA and expedited review for drugs and biologics supporting one or more critical national health priorities, while maintaining adherence to the law’s rigorous safety and effectiveness standards. The national health priorities include public health crisis response, innovative breakthrough therapies, large unmet medical needs, onshoring and supply chain resilience initiatives, and affordability improvements. To date, FDA has issued 18 Commissioner’s National Priority vouchers and approved four products to receive these vouchers, including two oncology drugs 44 and 55 days after filing.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

March 20, 2026

On March 18, 2026, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued draft guidance entitled “General Considerations for the Use of New Approach Methodologies in Drug Development.” The guidance is meant to provide drug developers with a validation framework and general recommendations for using new approach methodologies (NAMs) in drug development. The use of NAMs can improve predictive toxicology in humans and reduce reliance on animal testing.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

March 16, 2026

On March 9, 2026, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a draft guidance, “Responding to FDA Form 483 Observations at the Conclusion of a Drug CGMP Inspection.” The guidance is intended for foreign and domestic human and animal drug establishments manufacturing drugs regulated by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) and the Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM). The guidance is also intended for combination product manufacturers for which CDER or CBER is the lead center.

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.