FDA Opens the Vault on Decision Letters—Releases Wave of Drug and Biologic CRLs

July 10, 2025

Reading Time : 1 min

This morning, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the publication of more than 200 decision letters, also known as complete response letters (CRLs), with plans to release more from the archives. The CRLs released today are associated with applications for drugs and biologics submitted for approval between 2020 and 2024 that have since been approved by the agency.

In the accompanying press release, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, M.D., M.P.H., stated that drug developers have been “playing a guessing game when navigating the FDA…” and that “[d]rug developers and capital markets alike want predictability.” He indicated that the publication of these CRLs will help the agency to provide both parties with greater visibility into the agency’s processes, noting that this will hopefully bring “cures and meaningful treatments to patients faster.” The press release goes on to note that sponsors have “often misrepresent[ed] the rationale behind FDA’s decision to their stakeholders and the public.” In particular, “[a]ccording to a 2015 analysis conducted by FDA researchers, sponsors avoided mentioning 85% of the FDA’s concerns about safety and efficacy when announcing publicly that their application was not approved… [and that] when FDA calls for a new clinical trial for safety or efficacy, that critical information is not disclosed approximately 40% of the time.”

The release of negative decision letters to improve transparency is not a new idea. In fact, FDA’s campaign to release CRLs goes back more than 15 years, including the 2010 report released by FDA’s Transparency Task Force that proposed the disclosure of CRLs. As the press release alludes to, FDA resources will be implicated in reviewing these letters for the redaction of confidential and trade secret information.

Novel idea or not, today’s announcement will mean that companies will need to consider the implications of a CRL being released, both with regard to their investors and the public. It is possible that this will lead to more application withdrawals and may even hinder innovation in these areas. In turn, product developers, investors and others will potentially have greater insights into FDA’s expectations for particular types of drugs and biologics.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Eye on FDA

September 8, 2025

On September 3, 2025, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced Rare Disease Evidence Principles (RDEP) with processes aimed at providing greater predictability and facilitating the development and review of drugs intended to treat rare diseases with very small patient populations and significant unmet medical needs driven by a known genetic defect. In conjunction with the agency’s announcement of the new processes jointly proposed by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), the agency also unveiled additional information regarding eligibility and the potential for post-marketing requirements for those sponsors who participate in it.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

August 27, 2025

Food dye reform has been an area of focus for the Trump administration as part of its Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) initiative, giving momentum to an effort the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had already started by banning Red No. 3 for use in food and ingested drugs. FDA has continued to prioritize this work by taking actions to phase out the use of synthetic dyes and move to natural dyes since calling for these changes earlier this year, as discussed in our previous blog on the related announcement by the administration.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

August 12, 2025

Last week, former Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner David Kessler submitted a citizen petition urging FDA to revoke the generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status of refined carbohydrates used in industrial food processing. The petition follows FDA’s and the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) joint request for information (RFI) to establish a formal definition for ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and offers FDA a legal pathway to change the regulatory status of these ingredients.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

August 6, 2025

On August 6, 2025, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) became the latest governmental agency to confirm that fluoropolymers are both safe and necessary. After an independent safety review of fluoropolymers in medical devices showed no conclusive evidence of health issues, FDA concluded that fluoropolymers are “very unlikely to cause toxicity” because of molecular size and further that they are essential for medical devices to function. As a result, “FDA’s evaluation is that currently there is no reason to restrict their continued use in devices.” This announcement will be a source of relief to the device and diagnostics industries.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

July 25, 2025

On July 25, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), unveiled the highly anticipated joint request for information on ultra-processed foods (UPFs). Specifically, the administration is seeking information and data to help develop a uniform definition for UPFs in the U.S. food supply.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

July 22, 2025

Dr. George Tidmarsh has been selected to replace Dr. Jacqueline Corrigan-Curay as the director of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) at FDA as she prepares to retire from the agency. Dr. Tidmarsh is an adjunct professor of pediatrics and neonatology at Stanford University and is credited as having been involved in the development of several approved drugs. Until late May of this year, Dr. Tidmarsh was a member of the board of directors of Revelation Biosciences, a company engaged in developing an anti-inflammatory IV therapy. Among other roles and experiences he has had, he was a founding Co-Director of Stanford’s Master of Science in Translational Research and Applied Medicine (M-TRAM) program, and founded Horizon Pharma in 2005.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

July 16, 2025

Recently, it was reported that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is launching two cross-agency artificial intelligence (AI) councils. One AI council will be tasked with addressing how the agency uses AI internally and the other will focus on policy governing AI’s use in FDA-regulated products (reportedly pre-existing AI councils in various FDA divisions will continue to operate) (Politico Pro).

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

July 16, 2025

This week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted another color additive petition, approving the use of Gardenia (Genipin) in various food and beverage products. This marks the fourth naturally-derived color additive authorized for use in foods since FDA’s April announcement to phase out all petroleum-based synthetic dyes in food and transition to natural alternatives (read more here). Gardenia blue, derived from the fruit of the gardenia, a flowering evergreen, is now approved for use in sport drinks, flavored or enhanced non-carbonated water, fruit drinks and ades, ready-to-drink teas, hard candy and soft candy.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.