FDA Puts Orange B on the Chopping Block

September 23, 2025

Reading Time : 1 min

Last week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a proposed rule to revoke the color additive listing for Orange B, a synthetic dye historically used on the casings and surfaces of frankfurters and sausages. This action is part of the broader “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) initiative to phase out petroleum-based foods from the American food supply by the end of 2026 and efforts to modernize the agency’s regulations.

Notably, no batches of Orange B have been certified or requested for use since 1978, signaling that the industry has long since abandoned its use. Based on this, FDA tentatively concludes that the color additive listing for Orange B is “outdated and unnecessary”. If finalized, the rule would revoke the authorization entirely, meaning that any use of the color additive in food after its certification lapses and the listing is removed would render the product adulterated under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA).

Unlike the recent revocation of the FD&C Red Dye No. 3 listing, the proposed revocation of Orange B is largely administrative in nature, given the apparent absence of any known commercial use in decades.

Public comments on the proposed rule are due on or before October 17, 2025.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Eye on FDA

April 1, 2026

On March 30, 2026, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a final guidance entitled “Incorporating Voluntary Patient Preference Information over the Total Product Life Cycle.” The guidance provides updated recommendations to industry and FDA on how and when voluntary patient preference information (PPI) may be considered by FDA staff in decision making relating to devices. PPI is not required for FDA’s consideration as part of FDA decision making, but FDA may find it valuable to consider patient viewpoints when the information meets applicable legal requirements. In addition, FDA encourages industry and other interested parties to consider patient experience data in device development and evaluation, including data relating to patient preferences for outcomes and treatments. FDA acknowledges that patient perspective and personal experiences can help FDA evaluate the benefit-risk profile of certain devices throughout the total product life cycle.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

March 24, 2026

On March 20, 2026, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the agency will hold a public hearing on the Commissioner’s National Priority Voucher (CNPV) Pilot Program, with a Federal Register notice soliciting public comment and scheduling a public hearing for June 12, 2026. As previously noted here and here, the program was announced in June 2025 for the purpose of providing select sponsors with a nontransferable voucher for enhanced engagement with FDA and expedited review for drugs and biologics supporting one or more critical national health priorities, while maintaining adherence to the law’s rigorous safety and effectiveness standards. The national health priorities include public health crisis response, innovative breakthrough therapies, large unmet medical needs, onshoring and supply chain resilience initiatives, and affordability improvements. To date, FDA has issued 18 Commissioner’s National Priority vouchers and approved four products to receive these vouchers, including two oncology drugs 44 and 55 days after filing.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

March 20, 2026

On March 18, 2026, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued draft guidance entitled “General Considerations for the Use of New Approach Methodologies in Drug Development.” The guidance is meant to provide drug developers with a validation framework and general recommendations for using new approach methodologies (NAMs) in drug development. The use of NAMs can improve predictive toxicology in humans and reduce reliance on animal testing.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

March 16, 2026

On March 9, 2026, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a draft guidance, “Responding to FDA Form 483 Observations at the Conclusion of a Drug CGMP Inspection.” The guidance is intended for foreign and domestic human and animal drug establishments manufacturing drugs regulated by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) and the Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM). The guidance is also intended for combination product manufacturers for which CDER or CBER is the lead center.

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.