Is Self-Affirming GRAS Off the Menu?

March 12, 2025

Reading Time : 2 min

United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kennedy recently directed the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to consider rulemaking to revise its longstanding regulations and guidance governing the oversight of food ingredients to eliminate the ability of individuals and companies to self-affirm that their ingredients are Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS). This would mark a massive shift in how new food ingredients are introduced to the market.

In 1958, Congress enacted the Food Additives Amendment to the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA). These amendments required that “food additives” receive premarket approval from FDA, unless they were “substances that are generally recognized, among experts qualified by scientific training and experience to evaluate their safety as having been adequately shown… to be safe under the conditions of their intended use.” Such substances are considered to be “generally recognized as safe”.[1]

The agency’s approach to GRAS determinations has evolved over the intervening decades, with the last major change coming in 2016 with the publication of what is referred to as the final GRAS rule. Under this rule, “any person may notify FDA of a view that a substance is not subject to the premarket approval requirements….” 21 C.F.R. § 170.205. This provision establishes a voluntary pathway for industry to submit a GRAS notification to FDA—in other words, a person or company may make an “independent conclusion of GRAS status” without also making a submission to FDA (though FDA strongly encourages submitting notice to the agency for review).[2]This process, otherwise known as “self-affirming,” is the subject of Secretary Kennedy’s order.  

In his order, Secretary Kennedy states that “[f]or far too long, ingredient manufacturers and sponsors have exploited a loophole that has allowed new ingredients and chemicals, often with unknown safety data, to be introduced into the U.S. food supply without notification to the FDA or the public… Eliminating this loophole will provide transparency to consumers, [and] help get our nation’s food supply back on track….” Further still, the order notes that HHS is “committed to working with Congress to explore ways legislation can completely close the GRAS loophole.”

While details are sparse, removal of the self-affirming pathway would presumably require rulemaking or legislation. In the interim, FDA could start exercising greater scrutiny of self-affirming GRAS determinations. An end to the self-affirmation process would also create significantly more work for the agency in evaluating proposed new ingredients, at a time when the administration is attempting to drastically shrink the FDA work force.


[1] Note that substances used in food before 1958 may also be considered GRAS based on a determination made through experience based on common use in food. 21 C.F. R. § 170.30.

[2] 81 Fed. Reg. 54,960, 54,966 (Aug. 17, 2016).

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Eye on FDA

September 29, 2025

FDA recently released two draft guidance documents for industry related to cell and gene therapy (CGT) products as the agency seeks to advance the efficient development and review of safe and effective CGT products and fulfill related commitments set forth in the 2022 reauthorization of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA VII). This latest guidance may be of particular interest to CGT developers and various patient groups.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

September 24, 2025

On Tuesday, September 23, 2025, FDA published guidance titled “Consideration of Enforcement Policies for In Vitro Diagnostic Tests During a Section 564 Declared Emergency.” The guidance, a draft of which was published on May 6, 2024, specifies the factors that FDA intends to assess in deciding whether to issue an enforcement discretion policy with regard to in vitro diagnostics (IVD) manufacturers offering unapproved IVDs, among other devices, during a declared emergency. These factors include:

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

September 23, 2025

Last week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a proposed rule to revoke the color additive listing for Orange B, a synthetic dye historically used on the casings and surfaces of frankfurters and sausages. This action is part of the broader “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) initiative to phase out petroleum-based foods from the American food supply by the end of 2026 and efforts to modernize the agency’s regulations.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

September 12, 2025

The White House’s Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Commission, led by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., released its highly anticipated strategy outlining a multi-agency approach focused on addressing childhood chronic disease. The strategy builds on the Commission’s inaugural health assessment, a report which examined the rising rates of childhood chronic diseases in the country and identified four primary drivers: poor diet due to consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs), exposure to environmental chemicals; increased technological use; and overmedicalization. To combat these challenges, the strategy released on September 9, 2025, outlines a four-prong approach which provides further insight into the areas the administration sees as key areas of MAHA going forward: advancing research, realigning incentives, increasing public awareness and fostering private sector collaborations.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

September 8, 2025

On September 3, 2025, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced Rare Disease Evidence Principles (RDEP) with processes aimed at providing greater predictability and facilitating the development and review of drugs intended to treat rare diseases with very small patient populations and significant unmet medical needs driven by a known genetic defect. In conjunction with the agency’s announcement of the new processes jointly proposed by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), the agency also unveiled additional information regarding eligibility and the potential for post-marketing requirements for those sponsors who participate in it.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

August 27, 2025

Food dye reform has been an area of focus for the Trump administration as part of its Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) initiative, giving momentum to an effort the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had already started by banning Red No. 3 for use in food and ingested drugs. FDA has continued to prioritize this work by taking actions to phase out the use of synthetic dyes and move to natural dyes since calling for these changes earlier this year, as discussed in our previous blog on the related announcement by the administration.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

August 12, 2025

Last week, former Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner David Kessler submitted a citizen petition urging FDA to revoke the generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status of refined carbohydrates used in industrial food processing. The petition follows FDA’s and the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) joint request for information (RFI) to establish a formal definition for ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and offers FDA a legal pathway to change the regulatory status of these ingredients.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

August 6, 2025

On August 6, 2025, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) became the latest governmental agency to confirm that fluoropolymers are both safe and necessary. After an independent safety review of fluoropolymers in medical devices showed no conclusive evidence of health issues, FDA concluded that fluoropolymers are “very unlikely to cause toxicity” because of molecular size and further that they are essential for medical devices to function. As a result, “FDA’s evaluation is that currently there is no reason to restrict their continued use in devices.” This announcement will be a source of relief to the device and diagnostics industries.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.