Self‑Collection Kits in the Crosshairs

January 28, 2026

Reading Time : 2 min

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has begun 2026 with a clear signal to the direct‑to‑consumer testing industry: self‑collection devices remain firmly within the agency’s regulatory reach, notwithstanding the 2025 court ruling on laboratory developed tests (LDTs). Last week, the agency published warning letters previously issued to four companies—Genetrace, Genovate, Germaphobix and ProDx Health—selling human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) tests that rely on unauthorized self‑collection kits.

According to the warning letters, these companies offer HIV testing services that include distribution of self‑collection kits containing dried blood spot (DBS) cards, which allow patients to collect blood samples at home and mail them to laboratories for testing. FDA considers these DBS cards to be medical devices, and they lack agency authorization for use for self-collection.

This compliance activity comes after a significant setback for FDA last year, when the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas vacated the agency’s final rule on LDTs. The rule would have formally established FDA’s authority to regulate LDTs as medical devices, resolving a longstanding disagreement over the agency’s role in overseeing these tests. This is not the first time FDA has taken advisory actions relating to HIV self-collection kits. FDA had issued a warning letter to another entity offering an HIV DBS card self-collection kit in October 2024, but that preceded the court’s decision on the LDT Rule.

While FDA can no longer rely on the vacated LDT Rule, the agency has consistently asserted that it retains authority over collection devices used to collect samples that are then analyzed on LDTs. FDA signaled this in the preamble to the LDT Rule, in which the agency clarified that its policy towards LDTs did not apply to collection devices, even if used with an LDT.

These warning letters confirm that FDA retains that position, and will initiate compliance actions accordingly, at least in some situations. However, it is noteworthy that these warning letters were issued by the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), which regulates HIV tests, rather than the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), which regulates most types of tests.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Eye on FDA

May 19, 2026

On May 12, 2026, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a notice in the Federal Register requesting comment on the agency’s efforts related to drug repurposing to help address unmet medical needs. In this request for information (RFI), FDA is seeking input to identify potential new uses for FDA-approved drugs—such as a new indication or a new population—to help accelerate the availability of treatments for unmet medical needs. Stakeholders are encouraged to submit priority disease areas and potential candidates for drug repurposing, particularly in cases where there is a lack of commercial incentive to pursue labeling changes or a significant unmet need.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

May 14, 2026

As medical chatbots proliferate, a new Pennsylvania lawsuit highlights a developing trend of states leading health artificial intelligence (AI) enforcement efforts, while the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) appears to be on the sidelines.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

May 13, 2026

On May 12, 2026, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced a major milestone in its approach to post-market oversight of chemicals in the food supply, finalizing a new proactive food chemical safety post-market assessment program and releasing two foundational papers: the “Enhanced Systematic Process for Post-Market Assessment of Chemicals in Food” and the “Tool for the Prioritization of Food Chemicals for Post-Market Assessment.”

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

May 5, 2026

In December 2016, the bipartisan 21st Century Cures Act (P.L. 114-255) was enacted, marking a pivotal milestone in advancing a patient-focused drug development (PFDD) paradigm. This law directed the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to develop and implement strategies to solicit view of patients during the medical product development process and consider the perspectives of patients during regulatory discussions. Over the past decade, FDA has steadily taken steps to implement the 21st Century Cures Act patient-focused drug development provisions, including through meetings by which patients, caregivers, family members and patient advocates, among others, have been able to provide information about patients’ experiences with a disease or condition. The opportunity to provide such feedback through these patient-focused meetings is a key pillar of the agency’s patient-focused drug development engagement.

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.