FERC Officially Terminates Consideration of Quarterly Reporting Requirement for Gas Transactions

Nov 17, 2015

Reading Time : 1 min

On November 17, 2015, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the “Commission”) issued an order officially terminating consideration of a three-year-old proposal to require quarterly reporting of every Natural Gas Act (NGA)-jurisdictional next-day or next-month natural gas transaction. When the Commission issued the Enhanced Natural Gas Market Transparency Notice of Inquiry (NOI) in November 2012, the Commission noted that the proposed reporting requirement would improve natural gas market transparency and enhance FERC’s ability to identify manipulative conduct in the natural gas markets. In response to the NOI, several parties filed comments raising various concerns with the proposal. Many commenters argued that the reporting requirement proposed in the NOI would not enhance natural gas market transparency, because it would apply to only NGA-jurisdictional sales, which comprise only a small portion of total natural gas sales. In addition to receiving comments, the Commission’s Office of Enforcement, in connection with the NOI, obtained additional information regarding natural gas marketing activities by sending data requests to certain natural gas marketers (the responses to which the Commission treated nonpublicly). In the November 17, 2015, order terminating the NOI proceeding, the Commission noted that “[a]fter gaining ongoing access to additional physical natural gas market data, we have determined that the NOI’s proposed reporting requirement is not necessary at this time” and that the Commission therefore would “exercise [its] discretion to terminate this proceeding.” 

Notably, while the Commission officially terminated further consideration of a new natural gas transaction reporting requirement, it continues to consider implementing substantial new reporting requirements for participants in the wholesale power markets. See our prior coverage here and here.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

June 25, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to the California Independent System Operator Corporation (CAISO) directing CAISO and CAISO transmission owners to show cause as to why CAISO’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (California Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., 195 FERC ¶ 61,214 (2026) (the Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 24, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to New York Independent System Operator, Inc. (NYISO) directing NYISO and NYISO transmission owners to show cause as to why NYISO’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (New York Independent System Operator, Inc., 195 FERC ¶ 61,216 (2026) (Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 23, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. (MISO) directing MISO and MISO transmission owners to show cause as to why MISO’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., 195 FERC ¶ 61,212 (2026) (Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 23, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. directing PJM and PJM transmission owners to show cause as to why PJM’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 195 FERC ¶ 61,211 (2026) (the Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.