Guidelines for Mexico's Wholesale Electricity Market

Sep 14, 2015

Reading Time : 3 min

Overview of the Guidelines

The Guidelines are divided into 19 sections and cover various aspects of the Market structure and operation, including the following:

  • registration and accreditation of market participants, which is required in order to conduct transactions within the Market
  • guarantees that market participants will be required to provide to ensure the performance and fulfillment of their obligations pursuant to the Guidelines
  • provisions regulating access to the National Electric System, as well as the transfer of assets
  • components of the short-term energy market, including general aspects of the offers for sale and purchase of electricity, virtual offers, bilateral transactions and offers from power plants, among others
  • operation of the short-term energy market, including Day Ahead Market, Real Time Market and the rules controlling coordination with the natural gas market
  • components and procedures for the operation of medium- and long-term auctions
  • rules governing surveillance of the Market, which will be performed by an Independent Market Observer and a Market Surveillance Unit
  • handling of breaches and resolution of disputes, including the procedures for suspension or restriction of a market participant’s activities in the Market.

Key Aspects of the Guidelines

Under the Guidelines, the Market will be operated by the National Center for Energy Control (CENACE), and Market participants will be able to enter into agreements with CENACE to purchase and sell electric energy, related services, power, clean energy certificates and other relevant products. Participants may enter into these agreements as generators, marketers, suppliers, nonsupplier marketers or qualified users. The implementation of the Market will be accomplished in several phases, some of which will begin as early as September 2015 (a testing phase) and others that will be delayed as far as 2018 or 2019.

Some of CENACE's obligations pursuant to the Guidelines are:

  • plan and control the operation of the National Electric System pursuant to the provisions of Guideline 6, the Network Code and operational provisions issued by the Energy Regulatory Commission (CRE)
  • report any monopolistic practices among market participants, any attempts by the participants to manipulate the Market or any other condition that may evidence lack of competition
  • inform the Independent Market Observer and the Market Surveillance Unit if it detects any practices or actions that compromise the effectiveness of the Market
  • inform CRE regarding any adjustments or amendments to the Guidelines that are necessary to fulfill the objectives of the Electricity Industry Act.

The Guidelines allow participants to purchase and sell energy and related products and services in two submarkets, known as the Real Time Market and the Day Ahead Market. The Hour Ahead Market will be available between 2017 and 2018.

Pursuant to the Guidelines, agreements for purchase and sale of power and energy with a term of up to three years shall be awarded to authorized market participants via medium-term auctions. Power and cumulative energy purchase and sale agreements with a term of up to 15 years, as well as agreements for the sale of clean energy certificates with a term of up to 20 years, shall be awarded via long-term auctions. Basic suppliers, qualified suppliers, last recourse suppliers and qualified users are the entities allowed to participate in the auctions.

The Guidelines also contemplate a coordinated effort between the gas sector and the electricity sector, although market participants are not released from applicable penalties should natural gas be unavailable to a participant at any given time, unless the participant’s particular circumstances fall within the scope of the exceptions contemplated by the Guidelines.

Importantly, the Guidelines lay the foundation for the purchase and sale of clean energy certificates. Participants will be able to sell clean energy certificates at any price, but CENACE will not allow any participant to make a sale offer that surpasses the actual number of certificates in such participant’s possession, pursuant to CRE’s records.

The Guidelines are a significant step in the restructuring of Mexico’s energy sector, which is aimed at creating an efficient, reliable and competitive electricity market, thereby improving the quality of the service for the benefit of the country and its consumers. These Guidelines will, in turn, give rise to the creation of rules and regulations containing procedures, manuals and processes that are essential to the operation of the Market.

Contact Information

If you have any questions regarding this alert, please contact:

Dino Elizardo Barajas
Partner
dbarajas@akingump.com
310.552.6613
Los Angeles

Steven P. Otillar
Partner
sotillar@akingump.com
713.250.2225
Houston

Vladimir Fet
Counsel
vfet@akingump.com
310.552.6616
Los Angeles

Larissa Calva Ruiz

Staff Attorney
lcalvaruiz@akingump.com
310. 229.1063
Los Angeles

 

 

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

July 8, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to ISO New England Inc. (ISO-NE) directing ISO-NE and ISO-NE participating transmission owners to show cause as to why ISO-NE’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (ISO New England Inc., 195 FERC ¶ 61,215 (2026) (Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 7, 2026

On June 29, 2026, the Supreme Court granted a petition for certiorari in Leonard Hoffmann v. WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. (Hoffmann), which presents the question whether section 7 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) requires pipeline companies using federal eminent domain authority to pay landowners’ attorney’s fees in states where landowners can recover those fees under state law. In the decision giving rise to the Supreme Court’s review, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that a group of ranchers were not entitled to recover their $383,300 in attorney’s fees incurred while negotiating their compensation—creating a circuit split with four other courts of appeals. Hoffmann will be heard during the Court’s October 2026 Term, and marks the second time in five years that the Court has agreed to interpret NGA section 7.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 6, 2026

On June 29, 2026, the United States Supreme Court issued Trump v. Slaughter, fundamentally reshaping presidential removal authority over independent regulatory agencies. The decision overruled a 90-year-old precedent established in Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, which had upheld the constitutionality of commissioner removal protections in the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act). As written, the FTC Act permits a commissioner’s removal “only for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.” In Slaughter, the Court was asked to reevaluate this standard following the President’s removal of a Democratic-appointed FTC commissioner from office in 2025 without cause. Finding for the President, the Court held that removal was permissible because the FTC Act’s for-cause removal protections for commissioners violate the separation of powers, specifically, the President’s removal power under Article II. The Court explained that the FTC exercises executive power because it promulgates binding rules, investigates and enforces those rules through administrative adjudications, and brings civil enforcement actions in federal court. It found that because it exercises these executive powers, its commissioners “must therefore be controlled by the Chief Executive, in whom such power is vested.” While previous recent cases addressing the scope of the Removal Power, Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Collins v. Yellen purported to preserve some kernel of Humphrey’s, the Court made clear that “[i]f anything more is left of Humphrey’s, we overrule it.”

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 25, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to the California Independent System Operator Corporation (CAISO) directing CAISO and CAISO transmission owners to show cause as to why CAISO’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (California Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., 195 FERC ¶ 61,214 (2026) (the Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.