Arizona Increased Tax Credit for Renewable Energy Facilities Used for Self-Consumption by Five Times per Facility

Oct 1, 2015

Reading Time : 3 min

Favorable Revisions

First, taxpayers may now claim a total of $25 million of tax credits per renewable energy facility instead of $5 million.  Previously, a taxpayer could receive a $1 million credit annually for each of the first five years a given renewable energy facility was operational.  The $1 million annual limit has been lifted to $5 million.  The five-year limit remains.

Second, the credit had previously been applicable only for taxpayers using their renewable energy production in furtherance of supporting the taxpayer’s manufacturing facility, but it is now also applicable for taxpayers using such energy for the purpose of supporting the taxpayer’s “International Operations Center.”  An International Operations Center is defined as a facility “that self-consumes renewable energy from a qualified [Arizona renewable energy] facility” and invests $1.25 billion in new capital assets (including costs of land, buildings and equipment) within 10 years, with a minimum of $100 million being spent annually (investments greater than $100 million in any year can be carried forward to make up for any shortfalls in future years).  A certification must be obtained from the Arizona Commerce Authority to validate that an investment is on track for these thresholds and that the property thus qualifies as an International Operations Center.

Third, with respect to International Operations Centers, self-consumption is very broadly defined to include power transferred to a utility “if the utility is the same utility that provides power to the owner’s International Operations Center in [Arizona].”  Therefore, for an International Operations Center, net metering is permitted, and the center does not actually have to use any of the electricity generated at its site.  With respect to manufacturing facilities, “self-consumption” continues to include power transferred to a utility if at least 90 percent of the power is “transferred back for self-consumption in [Arizona].”  

Key Considerations

Key considerations that taxpayers should keep in mind when planning to claim these credits include the following three concepts.

First, timing is critical.  Arizona will issue only $10 million of these credits per year, on a first-come, first-served basis.  This cap has not been increased, even though an individual facility may now qualify for $5 million of credits annually.  Taxpayers interested in claiming these credits should apply for them immediately, because two taxpayers each claiming the maximum would exhaust the available mandate. 

Furthermore, with respect to timing, if an International Operations Center is used, by December 31, 2018, a taxpayer must invest at least $100 million in a renewable energy facility in Arizona.  This $100 million is in addition to the above-mentioned capital spending requirements on the International Operations Center—meaning that a total outlay of at least $1.35 billion will be required to avoid having the credits clawed back.  For manufacturing operations, the rule continues to be that $300 million must be spent on Arizona renewable energy facilities by December 31, 2017, for a taxpayer to be eligible for the credits.    

Second, the credits can be clawed back if it turns out that the capital expenditure requirements are ultimately not met.  For example, if $1.25 billion is not spent on an International Operations Center within 10 years after its certification, the taxpayer will need to reimburse all credits used (potentially $25 million) to the state of Arizona.  Exemption from reimbursement may be granted only under circumstances of extraordinary hardship outside of a taxpayer’s control.

Third, the taxpayer is explicitly permitted to lease an International Operations Center to another party and still be eligible to claim the credits, and it may also be able to lease the associated renewable energy facility as well (with respect to the renewable energy facility, the applicable statutes appear to stipulate only that the taxpayer must “invest” in the facility, without prohibiting the leasing of such a facility).  This creates a significant tax credit opportunity for a financial institution with Arizona tax liability that is interested in making a passive investment in an International Operations Center and an associated renewable energy facility.

*This blog post was originally on Tax Equity Telegraph.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

October 24, 2025

On October 21, 2025, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a final order (DOE/FECM Order No. 5264-A1) granting Venture Global CP2 LNG, LLC long-term authorization to export up to 1,446 billion cubic feet per year of domestically produced liquefied natural gas (LNG) from its Louisiana facility to countries without a free trade agreement with the United States (Non-FTA Countries). The final order follows a March 2025 Conditional Order,2 which issued while DOE was still completing its review of the agency’s 2024 LNG Export Study.3 The final order confirms that the project’s export volume and term authorization (through December 31, 2050) are unchanged, but provides for a three-year “make-up period” to allow export of any approved volume not shipped during the original term.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 9, 2025

On October 1, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued Order No. 914 amending certain Commission regulations to incorporate a conditional sunset date in compliance with the Trump administration’s April 2025 Executive Order, “Zero-Based Regulatory Budgeting to Unleash American Energy” (the EO).

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 8, 2025

Akin is pleased to serve as a gold sponsor for Infocast’s Energy Independence Summit in Houston, October 21-23. Energy partner Charlie Ofner will moderate the Macroeconomics of Domestic Energy Independence panel, projects & energy transition partner Shariff Barakat will lead Opportunities in US Manufacturing: How Big, How Fast, How FEOC?, and counsel Taha Qureshi will guide the discussion on Cornerstones for Energy Independence: Investing in Grid Security & Cybersecurity.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 6, 2025

As of October 6, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) continues to operate despite the lapse in appropriations that resulted in a government shutdown on October 1, 2025. While FERC receives appropriations from Congress, it primarily is self-funded through fees and charges obtained from the industries it regulates, offsetting its total costs. Hence, during prior government shutdowns in 2018 and 2013, the agency was able to continue operations. However, FERC published a plan for operating in the event of a lapse in appropriations on September 30, 2025, available here

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

September 8, 2025

On September 4, 2025, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee convened a hearing to consider the nominations of Laura Swett and David LaCerte to serve as commissioners at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission). Swett is a former FERC Staff that served as legal and policy advisor to former FERC Chairman Kevin McIntyre and Commission Bernard McNamee. LaCerte is an attorney in private practice that previously held positions at the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board and the Louisiana Department of Veterans Affairs.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

September 9, 2025

On August 29, 2025, Christopher Wright, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) submitted a proposal to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) under section 403 of the Department of Energy Organization Act (DOE Organization Act), asking that FERC terminate its long-running proceeding in Docket No. PL18-1, which addresses proposed updates to its policy statement on the Certification of New Interstate Natural Gas Facilities. The docket resulted in a draft policy statement that has never been finalized, nor relied upon by FERC in a published order, but would require FERC to consider environmental impacts and potential mitigation prior to making a public interest determination under the Natural Gas Act (NGA). The Secretary asks FERC to rescind the draft policy statement in its entirety to remove any uncertainty in gas infrastructure development. Rescission would require FERC to initiate a new docket and develop a new record should it want to reinitiate similar policy changes in the future.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

August 15, 2025

On August 8, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued an enforcement order in Skye MS, LLC (Skye) and levied a $45,000 civil penalty on an intrastate pipeline operator in Mississippi, resolving an investigation into the operator’s violations of section 311 (Section 311) of the Natural Gas Policy Act (NGPA). FERC faulted the operator for providing a Section 311 transportation service without timely filing a Statement of Operating Conditions (SOC) and obtaining FERC’s approval for the transportation rates. Section 311 permits intrastate pipelines to transport interstate gas “on behalf of” interstate pipelines without becoming subject to FERC’s more extensive Natural Gas Act (NGA) jurisdiction, but requires the intrastate pipeline to have an SOC stating the rates and terms and conditions of service on file with FERC within 30 days of providing the interstate service. Under the NGPA, Section 311 rates must be “fair and equitable” and approved by FERC. In Skye, FERC stated that the operator began providing Section 311 service on certain pipeline segments in Mississippi in May 2023, following their acquisition from another Section 311 operator, but did not file an SOC with FERC until April 2025. The order ties the penalty to the approximately two-year delay between commencement of the Section 311 service and the SOC filing date. The pipeline operator was also ordered to provide an annual compliance report and to abide by additional verification requirements related to the filing of its FERC Form No. 549D, the Quarterly Transportation & Storage Report for Intrastate Natural Gas and Hinshaw Pipelines.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

August 6, 2025

In Sierra Club v. FERC, No. 24-1199 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 1, 2025), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) upheld the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) approval of a 1,000-foot natural gas pipeline segment crossing the United States-Mexico border (the Border Pipeline) under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), rejecting environmental groups’ challenges that FERC improperly limited its analysis under both the NGA and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as related to a 155-mile intrastate “Connector Pipeline” constructed upstream of the Border Pipeline in Texas.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.