Arizona Increased Tax Credit for Renewable Energy Facilities Used for Self-Consumption by Five Times per Facility

Oct 1, 2015

Reading Time : 3 min

Favorable Revisions

First, taxpayers may now claim a total of $25 million of tax credits per renewable energy facility instead of $5 million.  Previously, a taxpayer could receive a $1 million credit annually for each of the first five years a given renewable energy facility was operational.  The $1 million annual limit has been lifted to $5 million.  The five-year limit remains.

Second, the credit had previously been applicable only for taxpayers using their renewable energy production in furtherance of supporting the taxpayer’s manufacturing facility, but it is now also applicable for taxpayers using such energy for the purpose of supporting the taxpayer’s “International Operations Center.”  An International Operations Center is defined as a facility “that self-consumes renewable energy from a qualified [Arizona renewable energy] facility” and invests $1.25 billion in new capital assets (including costs of land, buildings and equipment) within 10 years, with a minimum of $100 million being spent annually (investments greater than $100 million in any year can be carried forward to make up for any shortfalls in future years).  A certification must be obtained from the Arizona Commerce Authority to validate that an investment is on track for these thresholds and that the property thus qualifies as an International Operations Center.

Third, with respect to International Operations Centers, self-consumption is very broadly defined to include power transferred to a utility “if the utility is the same utility that provides power to the owner’s International Operations Center in [Arizona].”  Therefore, for an International Operations Center, net metering is permitted, and the center does not actually have to use any of the electricity generated at its site.  With respect to manufacturing facilities, “self-consumption” continues to include power transferred to a utility if at least 90 percent of the power is “transferred back for self-consumption in [Arizona].”  

Key Considerations

Key considerations that taxpayers should keep in mind when planning to claim these credits include the following three concepts.

First, timing is critical.  Arizona will issue only $10 million of these credits per year, on a first-come, first-served basis.  This cap has not been increased, even though an individual facility may now qualify for $5 million of credits annually.  Taxpayers interested in claiming these credits should apply for them immediately, because two taxpayers each claiming the maximum would exhaust the available mandate. 

Furthermore, with respect to timing, if an International Operations Center is used, by December 31, 2018, a taxpayer must invest at least $100 million in a renewable energy facility in Arizona.  This $100 million is in addition to the above-mentioned capital spending requirements on the International Operations Center—meaning that a total outlay of at least $1.35 billion will be required to avoid having the credits clawed back.  For manufacturing operations, the rule continues to be that $300 million must be spent on Arizona renewable energy facilities by December 31, 2017, for a taxpayer to be eligible for the credits.    

Second, the credits can be clawed back if it turns out that the capital expenditure requirements are ultimately not met.  For example, if $1.25 billion is not spent on an International Operations Center within 10 years after its certification, the taxpayer will need to reimburse all credits used (potentially $25 million) to the state of Arizona.  Exemption from reimbursement may be granted only under circumstances of extraordinary hardship outside of a taxpayer’s control.

Third, the taxpayer is explicitly permitted to lease an International Operations Center to another party and still be eligible to claim the credits, and it may also be able to lease the associated renewable energy facility as well (with respect to the renewable energy facility, the applicable statutes appear to stipulate only that the taxpayer must “invest” in the facility, without prohibiting the leasing of such a facility).  This creates a significant tax credit opportunity for a financial institution with Arizona tax liability that is interested in making a passive investment in an International Operations Center and an associated renewable energy facility.

*This blog post was originally on Tax Equity Telegraph.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

February 10, 2026

The global energy sector enters 2026 amid major policy shifts, geopolitical tension and evolving market dynamics. The Trump administration’s reversal of Biden-era climate initiatives and renewed emphasis on domestic production have reshaped the policy landscape, offering a more favorable regulatory environment even as conflicts abroad, oil price volatility and shifting trade policies tempered deal activity through 2025.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

January 22, 2026

On January 16, 2026, the National Energy Dominance Council (NDEC) and governors from each of the 13 states in PJM issued a Statement of Principles urging PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) to hold an emergency backstop auction and take other measures to support the entry of new capacity to preserve the reliability of the PJM region. The Statement of Principles calls on PJM to expeditiously file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) tariff revisions that would overhaul aspects of PJM’s market rules to address rising electricity prices and growing reliability risks in the PJM region. The Statement of Principles comes at a time of growing concern that PJM will not have sufficient capacity in the coming years to meet demand due to the retirement of existing generation resources, the glacial pace of new entry and projected increased demand associated with data center development.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

December 21, 2025

On December 19, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued its much-anticipated order on show cause proceeding concerning the co-location of generation and load within the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) market.[1] In the order, the Commission finds that PJM’s tariff is unjust and unreasonable because it does not provide sufficient clarity on the rates, terms, and conditions of service applicable to generators serving Co-Located Load and does not include transmission services appropriate for customers that are willing and able to limit their use of the transmission system in certain conditions. 

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

November 25, 2025

We are pleased to share the program materials and a recording of Akin’s recently presented webinar, “Navigating the Evolving Landscape of Corporate PPAs.”

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.