Trends in the US Corporate PPA Market – Direct Energy Procurement by Commercial and Industrial Buyers Has Become a Necessity Rather Than an Election

November 6, 2025

Reading Time : 3 min

The market for the direct procurement of energy by commercial and industrial buyers has been active in the U.S. for a decade.  In years past, buyers often engaged in such purchases on a voluntary basis to achieve their goals to use renewable energy.  These days, C&I buyers are turning to direct procurement or self-supply to obtain a reliable source of energy.  Sufficient and accessible energy from a local utility may not be available or may be materially delayed or trigger significant capital costs.  This is a material change driven in part by increased demand for electricity, including demand from data centers, EV infrastructure and industrial development.       

Because of increased demand as well as other local challenges such as limited grid capacity and interconnection delays, C&I buyers may be required to actively seek a sufficient supply of electricity for their operations.  Many C&I buyers have gone farther than seeking a long-term corporate PPA and have undertaken to build their own behind-the-meter facilities to serve their needs.  Often these infrastructure projects are constructed and financed independently of the operations they support.  Co-located generation allows corporate buyers to bypass inadequate resources, accelerate development and construction, avoid grid congestion and curtailment and more directly manage reliability and the risk of outages.  Some buyers are also engaging in strategic partnerships to develop additional generation resources to ensure access to energy for new or expanding operations.      

A number of US utilities and IPPs have announced the development of additional gas-fired and renewable generation to meet additional electricity demand.  Meanwhile, many C&I buyers are still focused on achieving targets for the use of carbon-free or carbon-neutral sources of supply.  According to S&P, 10 GWs of the 11.5 GWs in corporate power purchase agreements executed in the first half of 2025 involve energy from wind and solar projects.1 Other corporate buyers have embraced nuclear and geothermal sources to meet their energy needs.  There has also been a significant increase in the use of energy storage to manage generation using various technologies in order to enhance resiliency and try to ensure available energy during outages or natural disasters.

Whether and what types of direct procurement options exist for U.S. C&I buyers depends on a number of factors, including the location of the buyer’s physical operations.  State regulatory law controls what types of energy sales outside of traditional purchases from a retail utility are permitted.  In some states, such options are quite limited.  Provisions allowing the corporate buyer to adopt a method of self-supply are common although not available in all states.  There may also be space, physical or meteorological limitations at the applicable buyer’s location.  In such circumstances, buyers may turn to virtual products or purchase and retire Renewable Energy Credits or RECs.    

There have been some recent changes in state law targeting C&I buyers with significant energy needs.  For example, the Power Act recently enacted in Oregon directs the local utility commission to create a new customer class for C&I buyers using at least 20 MW and requires such customers to commit to 10 years and a minimum volume of supply if seeking electricity from the local utility.  Legislation seeking to address the impact of high-demand customers including data centers has recently been proposed or enacted in Texas, Illinois, Virginia, Pennsylvania and California.  We expect this trend will continue based on concerns regarding the potential impact on residential customers.  Utilities meanwhile are also contending with existing renewable procurement requirements.    

Please join the Akin Project and Energy Transition team on Thursday, November 13 at 1:00 p.m. ET for a webinar reviewing the options available to corporate energy buyers, including behind-the-meter projects, interconnected near-site projects, virtual transactions and the purchase of RECs.  We will be joined by Monica Testa, VP of Origination & Power Marketing at Gridstor and Elody Samuelson, Manager at SE Advisory Services. We will highlight key goals and challenges from the perspective of both corporate energy buyers and generators, look at recent market and legislative trends and review some important legal and commercial risks that C&I buyers should consider. To register for the webinar, please click here.


1 https://www.spglobal.com/market-intelligence/en/news-insights/research/2025/09/the-future-of-energy-balancing-reliability-and-rising-costs

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

November 6, 2025

The market for the direct procurement of energy by commercial and industrial buyers has been active in the U.S. for a decade.  In years past, buyers often engaged in such purchases on a voluntary basis to achieve their goals to use renewable energy.  These days, C&I buyers are turning to direct procurement or self-supply to obtain a reliable source of energy.  Sufficient and accessible energy from a local utility may not be available or may be materially delayed or trigger significant capital costs.  This is a material change driven in part by increased demand for electricity, including demand from data centers, EV infrastructure and industrial development.       

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 27, 2025

On October 23, 2025, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) directed the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to conduct a rulemaking to assert jurisdiction over load interconnections to the bulk electric transmission system and establish standardized procedures for the interconnection of large loads.1 The Directive included an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (ANOPR) that sets forth the legal justification for asserting jurisdiction over transmission-level load interconnections and fourteen principles that should inform FERC’s rulemaking process. The Secretary has directed FERC to take “final action” on the Directive no later than April 30, 2026.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 24, 2025

On October 21, 2025, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a final order (DOE/FECM Order No. 5264-A1) granting Venture Global CP2 LNG, LLC long-term authorization to export up to 1,446 billion cubic feet per year of domestically produced liquefied natural gas (LNG) from its Louisiana facility to countries without a free trade agreement with the United States (Non-FTA Countries). The final order follows a March 2025 Conditional Order,2 which issued while DOE was still completing its review of the agency’s 2024 LNG Export Study.3 The final order confirms that the project’s export volume and term authorization (through December 31, 2050) are unchanged, but provides for a three-year “make-up period” to allow export of any approved volume not shipped during the original term.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 9, 2025

On October 1, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued Order No. 914 amending certain Commission regulations to incorporate a conditional sunset date in compliance with the Trump administration’s April 2025 Executive Order, “Zero-Based Regulatory Budgeting to Unleash American Energy” (the EO).

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 8, 2025

Akin is pleased to serve as a gold sponsor for Infocast’s Energy Independence Summit in Houston, October 21-23. Energy partner Charlie Ofner will moderate the Macroeconomics of Domestic Energy Independence panel, projects & energy transition partner Shariff Barakat will lead Opportunities in US Manufacturing: How Big, How Fast, How FEOC?, and counsel Taha Qureshi will guide the discussion on Cornerstones for Energy Independence: Investing in Grid Security & Cybersecurity.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 6, 2025

As of October 6, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) continues to operate despite the lapse in appropriations that resulted in a government shutdown on October 1, 2025. While FERC receives appropriations from Congress, it primarily is self-funded through fees and charges obtained from the industries it regulates, offsetting its total costs. Hence, during prior government shutdowns in 2018 and 2013, the agency was able to continue operations. However, FERC published a plan for operating in the event of a lapse in appropriations on September 30, 2025, available here

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

September 8, 2025

On September 4, 2025, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee convened a hearing to consider the nominations of Laura Swett and David LaCerte to serve as commissioners at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission). Swett is a former FERC Staff that served as legal and policy advisor to former FERC Chairman Kevin McIntyre and Commission Bernard McNamee. LaCerte is an attorney in private practice that previously held positions at the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board and the Louisiana Department of Veterans Affairs.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

September 9, 2025

On August 29, 2025, Christopher Wright, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) submitted a proposal to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) under section 403 of the Department of Energy Organization Act (DOE Organization Act), asking that FERC terminate its long-running proceeding in Docket No. PL18-1, which addresses proposed updates to its policy statement on the Certification of New Interstate Natural Gas Facilities. The docket resulted in a draft policy statement that has never been finalized, nor relied upon by FERC in a published order, but would require FERC to consider environmental impacts and potential mitigation prior to making a public interest determination under the Natural Gas Act (NGA). The Secretary asks FERC to rescind the draft policy statement in its entirety to remove any uncertainty in gas infrastructure development. Rescission would require FERC to initiate a new docket and develop a new record should it want to reinitiate similar policy changes in the future.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.