Corporate Renewable Energy Buyers’ Principles Highlight the Promise of Consumer/Utility Collaboration

Jul 24, 2014

Reading Time : 3 min

In an effort to address these challenges, 12 major U.S. companies, including Facebook, Walmart, Johnson & Johnson, Intel, Mars and General Motors, with the help of the World Resources Institute and the World Wildlife Fund, recently developed and published a set of Corporate Renewable Energy Buyers’ Principles (Principles). If successfully implemented, the Principles could substantially improve the relationships between large consumers and utilities, increase the availability of cost-competitive renewable power products and options, and reduce market complexity and transaction costs.3 The Principles, which are designed to, among other things, encourage collaboration between large-scale corporate energy consumers, utilities and power suppliers, incentivize utilities and suppliers to offer more cost-competitive renewable energy products to meet diverse customer needs, and maximize the complementary business, environmental and social benefits of renewable power production, set forth six principal needs and expectations:

  1. increased choice in options to procure renewable power to meet business goals and customer requirements;
  2. cost-competitiveness of renewable vs. “traditional” power, including pricing reflective of the comprehensive costs and benefits to the power system of renewable power;
  3. fixed-price renewable power purchase contracts with varying durational options to increase price certainty and avoid price volatility;
  4. better access to products and options that promote renewable power project development and actually reduce overall emissions, including bundled renewable energy/Renewable Energy Credit (REC) products, prevent “double counting” of REC-related environmental benefits, and enhance local economies and communities and grid resilience and security;
  5. better access to third-party financing and power purchase agreements and streamlined, simplified contracting and project financing processes;
  6. more opportunities to work with utilities, suppliers, and regulators to design and develop innovative renewable energy products and purchase options that fairly allocate costs and benefits and can be deployed for existing as well as new end-user load.4

The Principles offer a wide range of potential benefits to corporate energy consumers and the utilities and suppliers that serve them:

First, the Principles show that significant, large-scale corporate consumers are interested in working with utilities to meet their renewable energy needs.

Second, to the extent that implementation of the Principles further strengthens the business case for large commercial and industrial customers to purchase more renewable power, other similar large-scale consumers might become more likely to pursue similar options. As market participation grows, so should customers’ ability to influence the products and options that are available.

Third, successful implementation of the Principles, by increasing the likelihood that large-scale corporate consumers will work with their utilities, rather than around them, to procure more renewable power, should benefit utilities, suppliers and consumers alike as all involved can reap significant benefits from streamlined processes and reduced transaction times and costs.

Finally, a streamlined market that facilitates large-scale consumers’ purchases of more renewable power should enable more companies to commit to and successfully achieve clean energy goals faster and at lower cost, producing a competitive advantage and possibly increasing overall revenue. The potential benefits of this positive feedback loop are immense.

Whether these Principles will be effective in encouraging utilities to make available or facilitate the products and options requested by the initial signatories to the Principles remains to be seen. In any event, competitors of and companies like the initial signatories may wish to take notice of the Principles and consider the potential benefits of actively supporting them or pursuing similar market changes with their own utilities.


1 Julia E. Sullivan et al., Why End Users Are Investing (Big) in Distributed Generation, 27:2 Elec. J. 23-32 (2014). 

2 Joshua Ryor, Tackling U.S. Corporations’ 3 Challenges to Buying Renewable Energy, World Res. Inst. Blog (July 11, 2014), http://www.wri.org/blog/2014/07/tackling-us-corporations%E2%80%99-3-challenges-buying-renewable-energy.

3 Corporate Renewable Energy Buyers’ Principles: Increasing Access to Renewable Energy (July 2014), http://www.wri.org/sites/default/files/Corporate_Renewable_Energy_Buyers
_Principles.pdf
.

4 Id.  See also Press Release, World Res. Inst., Major U.S. Companies:  Unmet Renewable Energy Demand Requires Market Shift (July 10, 2014), http://www.wri.org/news/2014/07/major-us-companies-unmet-renewable-energy-demand-
requires-market-shift.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

April 15, 2025

On April 9, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order (EO)1 directing several federal agencies and subagencies that regulate energy, environmental, and conservation matters,2 including the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the Department of Energy (DOE), to establish conditional sunset dates for “regulations governing energy production.” The stated objective of the EO is to require agencies to periodically reexamine their regulations to ensure that they continue to serve the public good. For FERC, the order covers regulations promulgated under the Federal Power Act (FPA), the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act (FUA)3, as amended, while DOE must consider regulations promulgated under the Atomic Energy Act (AEA), the National Appliance Energy Conservation Act, the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct 1992), the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005) and the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), as amended (collectively the Covered Regulations).4 To the extent the DOE has been directed to promulgate regulations under various sections of the NGA, FPA and FUA, and FERC has been directed to promulgate regulations specific to the statutes attributed to the DOE in the EO, the EO is silent. The EO expressly does not apply to those “regulatory permitting regimes authorized by statute.”5

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

April 10, 2025

On April 8, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order (EO) directing the Department of Energy (DOE) to take steps to expand the use of its emergency authority under Federal Power Act (FPA) Section 202(c) to require the retention of generation resources deemed necessary to maintain resource adequacy within at risk-regions of the bulk power system regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).1 The EO appears to envision a more active role for DOE in overseeing and supporting the resource adequacy of the grid that deviates from the historic use of Section 202(c) and touches on issues at the intersection of state and federal authority over resource planning.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

March 10, 2025

On March 5, 2025, the United States Department of Energy (DOE) approved Golden Pass LNG Terminal LLC’s (GPLNG) request to extend a deadline to begin exporting liquefied natural gas (LNG) from its terminal facility currently under construction in Sabine Pass, Texas for 18 months, from September 30, 2025, to March 31, 2027 (the Order). The Order amends GPLNG’s two existing long-term orders authorizing the export of domestically produced LNG to countries with which the United States does and does not have free trade agreements (FTA).1  The Order does not amend the authorizations’ end date, which remains December 31, 2050. Under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), the DOE may authorize exports to non-FTA countries following completion of a “public interest” review, whereas exports to FTA countries are deemed to be in the public interest and the DOE is directed to issue authorizations without modification or delay.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

March 4, 2025

Join projects & energy transition partner Shariff Barakat at Infocast’s Solar & Wind, where he will moderate the “Tax Equity Market Dynamics” panel.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 13, 2025

Oil & gas companies continue to identify and capitalize on opportunities related to the deployment of new energy technologies, with their approaches broadly maturing and coalescing around maximizing synergies, leveraging available subsidies and responding to regulatory drivers.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 11, 2025

On January 30, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) approved a Stipulation and Consent Agreement (Agreement) between the Office of Enforcement (OE) and Stronghold Digital Mining Inc. (Stronghold) resolving an investigation into whether Stronghold had violated the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) tariff and Commission regulations by limiting the quantity of energy made available to the market to serve a co-located Bitcoin mining operation.1 This order appears to be the first instance of a public enforcement action involving co-located load and generation and comes at a time when both FERC and market operators2 are scrutinizing the treatment of co-located load due to the rapid increase in demand associated with data center development.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 5, 2025

2024 was about post-consolidation deal flow and a steady uptick in activity across the oil & gas market. This year, mergers & acquisitions (M&A) activity looks set to take on a different tone as major consolidation plays bed down.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

January 30, 2025

The oil & gas industry is experiencing a capital resurgence, driven by stabilizing interest rates and renewed attention from institutional investors. Private equity is leading the charge with private credit filling the void in traditional energy finance and hybrid capital instruments gaining in popularity. Family offices are also playing a crucial role, providing long-term, flexible investments.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.