Mexico’s Energy Industry

Jun 11, 2015

Reading Time : 8 min

Timeline

Click here to view the timeline that shows the next steps. Essentially, (i) the prequalified Consortium Bidders have until June 15 to request authorization to add non-prequalified Financing Partners, and (ii) the prequalified Consortium and Individual Bidders have until June 29 to request authorization to modify their structure or participation format. The CNH must communicate its final decision by July 6, in preparation for the Bidding Ceremony to be held on July 15.

Summary of Key Changes in the Final Guidelines and PSC

1. Limit on Financial Partners’ Participation: Section 12.5 of the Guidelines now states that the Financial Partners must always hold less than two-thirds of the participating interests in the Consortium (the operator must always hold at least one-third of the total participating interests).

2. Measurement Points: Updates to the corresponding definition and Clause 12 of the PSC confirmed that the Contractor will propose the location and operation of the Measurement Points, whether inside or outside of the Contract Areas, in compliance with Chapter 11 of the Manual of Petroleum Measurement Standards, subject to CNH’s final approval.

3. Evaluation Program: Article 5.2 of the PSC introduced a 60-day period after the CNH’s receipt of the Contractor’s Evaluation Program to analyze and communicate any comments/changes or its final approval, and a provision stating that such approval may not be denied without just cause.

4. Liability for Preexisting Damages: Article 14.4 of the PSC now provides a detailed account of the full process the Contractor must undergo to avoid liability for any environmental Preexisting Damages. First, the Contractor must commence environmental studies during the Initial Transition Period (as defined hereafter). Second, it must notify the CNH and present all supporting information regarding any Preexisting Damages within 180 days from the Effective Date. Third, the CNH and the Agencia Nacional de Seguridad Industrial y de Protección al Medio Ambiente del Sector Hidrocarburos (“Agency”) have a 60-day period to review the materials and object the Contractor’s claims. If the Parties do not agree on what constitutes Preexisting Damages, they may hold good-faith meetings to clarify and settle any technical differences. Fourth, if approved, the CNH and the Agency will provide a certificate identifying the specific Preexisting Damages for which the Contractor shall have no liability or responsibility, and the obligation to complete Abandonment activities in accordance with Article 3.4. If no agreement is reached, the dispute will be resolved in accordance with Clause 26.

5. Limitations on Administrative Rescission: Article 23.2, introduced in the May 29 version of the PSC, provided a series of substantive steps that the CNH must follow before commencing any formal administrative rescission process (“Investigacion Previa”). In this final version, an added provision allows the Contractor (i) to preemptively notify the CNH of any potential defaults or breaches of Contract that could cause an administrative rescission and (ii) to propose a cure or solution before the Investigacion Previa is launched.

PSC Main Features

1. Term: The PSC has duration of 30 years, starting on the Effective (execution) Date. The Contractor has two five-year extension options, subject to additional terms and conditions to maintain commercial production.

2. Initial Transition Period: Article 3.4 calls for the CNH to deliver the assets and information it may have relating to the Contract Area within 90 days of the Effective Date (“Initial Transition Period”).  During this period, the Contractor must commence social and environmental assessments to establish the baselines for the Contract Area and to identify any Preexisting Damages. Furthermore, the Contractor must inspect the assets made available in the Contract Area, and inform the CNH which assets it will retain and which assets should be abandoned or disposed by the previous operator.  At the end of the Initial Transition Period, the Contractor will assume complete control and full responsibility for the Contract Area.

3. Exploration Period: The Initial Exploration Period lasts four years in which the Contractor is expected to complete the Minimum Work Program. The Additional Exploration Period is a two-year extension option that will be granted if the Contractor (i) has completed the Minimum Work Program (ii) commits to finish any missing units from the Increased Minimum Program, and (iii) pledges to carry out the work units equivalent to one Well during the extension period. Additionally, the Contractor must provide a new Performance Guaranty.

4. Minimum Work Program: The Minimum Work Program, reminiscent of the 2001 Multiple Services Contract model, is based on work units assigned to specific Petroleum Activities. The scheme assigns a minimum level of investment by linking a fixed amount of units per Petroleum Activity to the average price of oil per barrel. Therefore, the minimum investment is directly proportional to the price per barrel for a specific period; while the work units will remain constant, as the price per barrel increases, the minimum investment will also increase. The Minimum Work Program incentivizes Contractors to allocate resources into specific Petroleum Activities, such as drilling Wells and obtaining/processing seismic or G&G information.

5. Evaluation Period: The Evaluation Period will last 12 months, and an additional 12-month option can be requested if the development of the discovery is technically or commercially complex. The CNH must be informed of any commercial discoveries, and any Hydrocarbons extracted during the Evaluation Period shall be considered Regular Commercial Production, subject to the production-sharing and payment schemes.

6. Nonassociated Gas or Sub-Salt Discoveries: The PSC has special provisions for nonassociated gas and pre-salt discoveries. Article 5.4 provides that the Contractor has 24 months to evaluate a nonassociated gas discovery, with a 12-month extension option (the standard evaluation period is 12 months). Similarly, Article 7.4 allows the CNH to give special consideration to pre-salt discoveries and grant additional time to evaluate the area if necessary.

7. Relinquishment: Clause 7 provides the different milestones at which the Contractor must relinquish percentages of the Contract Area based on its approved Evaluation and Development Programs.

8. Unitization: Clause 9 sets out a comprehensive approach to unitization. Contractors must first notify and provide information supporting unitization of Contract Areas to the Secretaria de Energia, the Secretaria de Hacienda and the CNH. These government entities have a set time-frame to assess the proposed unitization, request any additional information needed and issue their final decision. The Contractors will work with these entities and other Contractors to develop a unitization agreement that benefits all parties involved. Ultimately, the Minimum Work Program requirements will be reassessed, and operating duties will be assigned to maximize production and recovery of Hydrocarbons.

9. Payment and the Role of the Mexican Sovereign Wealth Fund (“Fondo”): The Fondo will provide a software program that shall interface with the Contractor’s software program to receive all production measurements and all expense information directly, including recoverable costs, to calculate the corresponding payments due to both the Contractor and the State. The Fondo will then provide the Contractor certificates of title for its share of Hydrocarbons. Annexes 3 and 11 provide clear steps on the payment process, as well as on the process to register the PSC, the parties involved in the Contract Area and the preferred payment methods with the Fondo. Even though the specific guidelines and the system are still under development, the PSC provides an outline of the Fondo’s role and its interaction with the Contractors.

10. Guarantees: The PSC requires Contractors to provide (i) an Exploration Performance Guaranty in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit for the estimated value of the applicable Minimum Work Program, (ii) an Additional Exploration Performance Guaranty (if applicable) and (iii) a Corporate Guaranty executed simultaneously by (a) the ultimate parent company or (b) a controlling entity within the same corporate group (“Guarantor”). The Guarantor must demonstrate a net worth of $6 billion and notify the CNH if its net worth dips below this benchmark. In such case, the Contractor must provide a new Corporate Guaranty executed by a Guarantor that complies with the financial benchmark requirement.

11. Abandonment: The Contractor must create an Abandonment Trust and progressively fund it based on the formula provided in Article 18.4. At the term of the PSC, the Contractor must carry out social and environmental assessments, compare them to the initial baselines, and determine the environmental and social effects that the Petroleum Activities have had in the Contract Area. The Contractor must present an Abandonment Plan to access the Abandonment Trust funds, which may be used for only Abandonment activities.

12. National Content: Thirteen percent of the Materials or services contracted or acquired during the Exploration Period must be of Mexican origin. The national content requirements increase to 25 percent during the Development Period and must reach 35 percent by 2025.

13. Force Majeure: Article 22.3 provides that force majeure applies during the whole term of the PSC. However, Contractor’s claims are limited to four contract extension periods of three months each due to force majeure. Under Article 22.4, both Parties have a right to terminate the PSC if an event of force majeure lasts for two (2) uninterrupted years.

14. Administrative Rescission: Administrative Rescission covers serious defaults, such as noncompliance with the Minimum Work Program without reasonable cause or unauthorized assignment of interests. Article 23.2 of the PSC provides that the CNH must carry out an administrative investigation process, specifically identifying its concerns and providing time for the Contractor to cure, before the Administrative Rescission process may begin. The CNH investigation may last anywhere from 30 days to two years, depending on the alleged administrative breach. Once the CNH finishes its investigation, it will give written notice of its findings and, if deemed necessary, commence the Administrative Rescission Process.  It is important to note that the Contractor may cure any alleged default during this process, until the CNH issues its final decision.

15. Contractual Rescission: Article 23.4 covers instances such as the Contractor missing deadlines without reasonable cause beyond a certain grace period, not maintaining the Guaranties in due form or not completing 90 percent of the Minimum Work Program. It also provides the Contractor with 30 days to cure any breach after receiving written notice. Furthermore, some of the default provisions allow other members of the Consortium to substitute a member company or Guarantor in case one of the members is liquidated, becomes bankrupt or insolvent, or is otherwise unable to meet its obligations.

16. Dispute Resolution: All contractual disputes, including Contractual Rescission, might be resolved in the first instance through Conciliation, in accordance with Articles 26.2 and 26.3. If the Parties cannot reach an agreement, they must submit the contractual dispute to international Arbitration, in accordance with Articles 26.5 and 26.6. The Contractor must continue performing all of its applicable duties under the PSC and must waive the right to bring up any claims through diplomatic channels.

Contact Information

We have prepared a detailed analysis of the entire PSC contract form.  If you are interested in receiving a copy of such materials, please do not hesitate to contact us at your convenience. If you have any questions regarding this alert, please contact any of the authors listed above.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

June 12, 2025

We are pleased to share the presentation slide deck and a recording of Akin’s recently presented webinar, “Navigating U.S. Policy Shifts in the Critical Minerals Sector.”

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 10, 2025

On June 4, 2025, the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) announced revisions to its procedures for pipeline safety enforcement actions. The changes, outlined in two new policy memoranda from PHMSA’s Office of the Chief Counsel (PHC), aim to enhance due process protections for pipeline operators by clarifying how civil penalties are calculated and expanding the disclosure of agency records in enforcement proceedings.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

May 22, 2025

On May 19, 2025, the Department of Energy (DOE) finalized its 2024 LNG Export Study: Energy, Economic and Environmental Assessment of U.S. LNG Exports (the 2024 Study) through the release of a Response to Comments on the 2024 Study. The Response to Comments concludes that the 2024 Study, as augmented through public comments submitted on or before March 20, 2025, supporting a finding that liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports serve the public interest. With the comment process complete, DOE will move forward with final orders on pending applications to export LNG to non-free trade agreement (non-FTA) countries.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

May 20, 2025

On Thursday, May 15, the Senate Commerce, Science & Transportation Subcommittee on Surface Transportation, Freight, Pipelines and Safety held a hearing titled, “Pipeline Safety Reauthorization: Ensuring the Safe and Efficient Movement of American Energy.” The hearing examined legislative priorities for reauthorizing the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA).

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

April 15, 2025

On April 9, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order (EO)1 directing several federal agencies and subagencies that regulate energy, environmental, and conservation matters,2 including the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the Department of Energy (DOE), to establish conditional sunset dates for “regulations governing energy production.” The stated objective of the EO is to require agencies to periodically reexamine their regulations to ensure that they continue to serve the public good. For FERC, the order covers regulations promulgated under the Federal Power Act (FPA), the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act (FUA)3, as amended, while DOE must consider regulations promulgated under the Atomic Energy Act (AEA), the National Appliance Energy Conservation Act, the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct 1992), the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005) and the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), as amended (collectively the Covered Regulations).4 To the extent the DOE has been directed to promulgate regulations under various sections of the NGA, FPA and FUA, and FERC has been directed to promulgate regulations specific to the statutes attributed to the DOE in the EO, the EO is silent. The EO expressly does not apply to those “regulatory permitting regimes authorized by statute.”5

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

April 10, 2025

On April 8, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order (EO) directing the Department of Energy (DOE) to take steps to expand the use of its emergency authority under Federal Power Act (FPA) Section 202(c) to require the retention of generation resources deemed necessary to maintain resource adequacy within at risk-regions of the bulk power system regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).1 The EO appears to envision a more active role for DOE in overseeing and supporting the resource adequacy of the grid that deviates from the historic use of Section 202(c) and touches on issues at the intersection of state and federal authority over resource planning.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

March 10, 2025

On March 5, 2025, the United States Department of Energy (DOE) approved Golden Pass LNG Terminal LLC’s (GPLNG) request to extend a deadline to begin exporting liquefied natural gas (LNG) from its terminal facility currently under construction in Sabine Pass, Texas for 18 months, from September 30, 2025, to March 31, 2027 (the Order). The Order amends GPLNG’s two existing long-term orders authorizing the export of domestically produced LNG to countries with which the United States does and does not have free trade agreements (FTA).1  The Order does not amend the authorizations’ end date, which remains December 31, 2050. Under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), the DOE may authorize exports to non-FTA countries following completion of a “public interest” review, whereas exports to FTA countries are deemed to be in the public interest and the DOE is directed to issue authorizations without modification or delay.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

March 4, 2025

Join projects & energy transition partner Shariff Barakat at Infocast’s Solar & Wind, where he will moderate the “Tax Equity Market Dynamics” panel.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.