Sol-Wind’s IPO Compared to YieldCos & Structures of Other MLPs

Dec 23, 2014

Reading Time : 3 min

Background

While publicly traded entities are generally required to be taxed as corporations, there is an exception under I.R.C. § 7704 pursuant to which certain publicly traded master limited partnerships are taxed as partnerships.  Sol-Wind’s structure is a master limited partnership (MLP) that meets the exception in I.R.C. § 7704 to be publicly traded, yet taxed as a partnership. 

Because Sol-Wind’s underlying assets are renewable energy projects that do not generate “qualifying income” for purposes of I.R.C. § 7704(d), the structure includes a blocker corporation1 between the MLP and the assets.  As a result, the venture will owe corporate tax.  However, according to the disclosure in the S-1, Sol-Wind does not “expect [its] corporate subsidiaries to generate a significant amount of taxable income for at least the next 30 years.”  Thus, on a present value basis the use of the corporate blocker to meet the rules of I.R.C. § 7704(d) results in only a de minimis tax cost. The tax cost is minimal because Sol-Wind has bought and will buy renewable energy projects that qualify for accelerated depreciation and tax credits and these tax benefits should more than offset the taxable income of the corporation.  The tax attributes that are not used in the current year to zero out the blocker corporation’s tax liability can be carried forward 20 years.

The S-1 also discloses that Sol-Wind has and will generally enter into “tax equity transactions” as a means of providing capital to acquire the renewable energy assets.  As explained in the S-1:

U.S. federal [and] state…governments…have established various tax incentives to support the development of renewable energy assets, which permits for the sale of tax equity. The incentives include PTCs, ITCs, accelerated tax depreciation and certain state tax credits (collectively, "Tax Benefits"). Investors in tax equity typically receive all or virtually all of the Tax Benefits, including PTCs, ITCs and depreciation, from U.S. solar and wind power generation assets and a small amount of cash flows from each asset.

It is not entirely clear from the S-1 how Sol-Wind can both monetize the Tax Benefits in tax equity transactions and still not owe any corporate level tax for 30 years.  Presumably, it will monetize less than all of the Tax Benefits in the tax equity transactions to enable the corporate blocker to shelter its income for the next 30 years.

Comparison of Sol-Wind’s MLP to Other Structures

The Sol-Wind structure is like an upside down yieldco.  In the yieldco structure, the public entity is a corporation that owns a partnership; in the Sol-Wind structure, the public entity is a partnership that owns a corporation.  One drawback of the Sol-Wind structure is that the public investors will receive an IRS Schedule K-1 from the MLP, which causes tax filing complexity not present in the yieldco structure (where the public holds corporate stock).

The Sol-Wind structure is similar to the MLP structure used by private equity fund managers that went public (e.g., KKR).  These MLPs also had underlying assets that generated non-qualifying income under I.R.C. § 7704(d) and, therefore, had to have a blocker corporation between their business operations and the MLP.

The blocker structure used by Sol-Wind and the private equity fund manager MLPs is different from the classic structure used for oil and gas MLPs.  Oil and gas MLPs do not need to interpose a corporation between the MLP and the underlying business operations because oil and gas assets generate “qualifying income” under I.R.C. § 7704(d).  Thus, the corporate tax is avoided completely.

If the MLP Parity Act is enacted, then Sol-Wind’s solar and wind projects would be deemed to generate “qualifying income” and Sol-Wind could qualify as an MLP without the use of the corporate blocker.  In other words, passage of the MLP Parity Act means that Sol-Wind (and other MLPs owning renewable energy assets) could use the classic MLP structure and thereby avoid the extra corporate level tax, as is the case for oil and gas MLPs.  A discussion of the MLP Parity Act is available here


1 The blocker corporation is a limited liability company organized in Delaware that makes an election to be taxed as a corporation.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

December 21, 2025

On December 19, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued its much-anticipated order on show cause proceeding concerning the co-location of generation and load within the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) market.[1] In the order, the Commission finds that PJM’s tariff is unjust and unreasonable because it does not provide sufficient clarity on the rates, terms, and conditions of service applicable to generators serving Co-Located Load and does not include transmission services appropriate for customers that are willing and able to limit their use of the transmission system in certain conditions. 

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

November 25, 2025

We are pleased to share the program materials and a recording of Akin’s recently presented webinar, “Navigating the Evolving Landscape of Corporate PPAs.”

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

November 12, 2025

On November 7, 2025, the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) reversed their prior positions and approved Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 401 Water Quality Certifications and other environmental permits for the Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Company’s (Transco) Northeast Supply Enhancement Project (NESE). NESE is a 25-mile natural gas pipeline expansion project certificated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) that is intended to deliver 400,000 dekatherms per day of natural gas produced in Pennsylvania to local distribution company customers in New York City through new facilities in Middlesex County, New Jersey and an underwater segment traversing the Raritan and Lower New York Bays.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

November 6, 2025

The market for the direct procurement of energy by commercial and industrial buyers has been active in the U.S. for a decade.  In years past, buyers often engaged in such purchases on a voluntary basis to achieve their goals to use renewable energy.  These days, C&I buyers are turning to direct procurement or self-supply to obtain a reliable source of energy.  Sufficient and accessible energy from a local utility may not be available or may be materially delayed or trigger significant capital costs.  This is a material change driven in part by increased demand for electricity, including demand from data centers, EV infrastructure and industrial development.       

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.