Senate Considers Swett and LaCerte Nominations to be FERC Commissioners Amid Reliability and Independence Debates

September 8, 2025

Reading Time : 3 min

By: Stephen J. Hug, Emily P. Mallen, Christopher A. Treanor, Ben N. Reiter, Corban A. Coffman, Sharmila P. Das, Maria Posada Velasco (Public Law and Policy Fellow)

On September 4, 2025, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee convened a hearing to consider the nominations of Laura Swett and David LaCerte to serve as commissioners at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission). Swett is a former FERC Staff that served as legal and policy advisor to former FERC Chairman Kevin McIntyre and Commission Bernard McNamee. LaCerte is an attorney in private practice that previously held positions at the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board and the Louisiana Department of Veterans Affairs.

If confirmed, Swett would fill the seat vacated by former Chairman Mark Christie, whose term expired on June 30, 2025, while LaCerte would succeed former Chairman Willie Phillips, who resigned in April at the request of the White House. Swett’s term would run through June 30, 2030, and LaCerte’s through June 30, 2026. Confirmation of both nominees would give Republicans a 3-2 majority on the Commission.

Amid recent debates over the independence of agencies such as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the Federal Reserve, Democrats on the Committee underscored the importance of preserving FERC’s autonomy and protecting its staff from reductions in force. Ranking Member Martin Heinrich (D-NM) stressed that FERC is unique for its statutorily required independence, designed to protect impartial decision-making. He specifically raised concerns about a recent executive order titled, “Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies” (EO 14215), which asserts greater White House control over independent regulatory agencies. Swett affirmed that FERC’s independence is rooted in statute and pledged to base all decisions solely on the law. She also drew on her experience as a former FERC staffer to vouch for protection of the agency’s staff. LaCerte noted that while he would personally welcome a Supreme Court modification of Humphrey’s Executor if revisited, he would “do the utmost of [his] ability under the law to maintain the independence of FERC, a hundred percent.” LaCerte also agreed to protect the agency’s staff.

Alongside independence, senators pressed the nominees on how FERC should address unprecedented demand growth driven by artificial intelligence (AI), data centers and electrification. Swett warned that unmet demand could force data centers abroad, creating national security and economic risks. LaCerte said his approach would be to ask of every decision whether it makes the grid more reliable and affordable. Multiple senators emphasized the urgency of adding resources quickly, with Sen. Angus King (I-ME) noting that wind and solar are both the cheapest and fastest to deploy. Both nominees committed to a technology-neutral approach consistent with the Federal Power Act.

The hearing also highlighted the large backlog of projects awaiting interconnection and the need to expand interstate transmission. Swett noted FERC’s recent interconnection reforms are under judicial review but pledged to work with colleagues on solutions, while LaCerte called the backlog part of a broader set of infrastructure delays facing the energy sector and emphasized collaboration with regional transmission organizations (RTOs), independent system operators (ISOs) and states. Both nominees supported wider deployment of grid-enhancing technologies to maximize existing assets, reduce costs and speed connections.

Looking ahead, Swett’s FERC background may help her secure bipartisan support, while LaCerte may be less likely to attract Democratic backing given concerns about his limited energy experience. Several Democratic senators referenced FERC’s organic act, which requires each commissioner to be “specifically qualified to assess fairly the needs and concerns of all interest affected by federal energy policy.” The nominations advance amid a broader backlog of confirmations in the Senate, leaving the timing uncertain, but members on both sides emphasized the urgency of addressing surging electricity demand, underscoring the need for a fully seated Commission. Akin will continue to monitor the confirmation process and related policy debates over reliability, permitting reform and grid modernization.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

March 10, 2026

Federal energy regulators are assuming expanded roles as the administration prioritizes energy dominance and infrastructure development to meet unprecedented power demand. FERC Chairman Laura Swett has vowed to expedite data center interconnections while addressing jurisdictional challenges, warning that unmet electricity demand could drive data centers abroad and create national security risks. The agency is processing pipeline applications faster than in prior years and considering blanket authorizations for certain LNG and hydroelectric projects to streamline approvals. 

Pipeline projects previously stalled by Clean Water Act permits are being revitalized, particularly in northeastern states where historically high electricity prices have increased openness to natural gas infrastructure. The Department of Energy is expanding its emergency authority to require retention of generation resources and has granted major LNG export approvals, signaling commitment to expanding U.S. export capacity under a streamlined framework that deprioritizes climate considerations.  

The Administration is bullish on the opportunities for the U.S. energy industry in Venezuela and eager to support companies willing to navigate the political risk inherent in the operations at the moment. Early meetings with President Trump and industry leaders showed the path forward may be longer and more complex than anticipated by the President. 

As permitting reforms advance and the pendulum swings toward fossil fuel favorability, the regulatory and policy landscape is fundamentally reshaping energy infrastructure development timelines and investment opportunities. 

Oil & Gas in 2026: Energy Policy & Regulation 

Delve into the complete regulatory & policy outlook at our Oil & Gas in 2026 report.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

March 3, 2026

Macroeconomic turbulence and volatile commodity markets significantly influenced oil & gas M&A activity throughout 2025, with deals showing renewed momentum only in the year's second half.  

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 24, 2026

On February 19, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued an order rescinding the soft price cap for bilateral spot market energy sales in the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) region.1 As previously covered, on July 15, 2025, FERC initiated a Federal Power Act Section 206 proceeding following the D.C. Circuit’s decision finding that FERC must apply the Mobile-Sierra public interest standard before ordering refunds for above-cap bilateral sales and vacating FERC’s orders requiring refunds for certain bilateral spot market transactions in the WECC region that exceeded the $1,000 MWh soft price cap.2 FERC’s Order follows through on the proposal it made last July to eliminate the WECCs soft price cap and marks a recognition that Western wholesale markets have evolved over the past two decades to become sufficiently competitive to render the soft price cap unnecessary.  

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

February 23, 2026

The oil & gas industry is experiencing a fundamental transformation in how companies access and deploy capital in 2026. Despite strong balance sheets and robust free cash flow generation, the sector is witnessing strategic shifts in funding sources and investment priorities that signal a new era of capital allocation.

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.