Senate Considers Swett and LaCerte Nominations to be FERC Commissioners Amid Reliability and Independence Debates

September 8, 2025

Reading Time : 3 min

By: Stephen J. Hug, Emily P. Mallen, Christopher A. Treanor, Ben N. Reiter, Corban A. Coffman, Sharmila P. Das, Maria Posada Velasco (Public Law and Policy Fellow)

On September 4, 2025, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee convened a hearing to consider the nominations of Laura Swett and David LaCerte to serve as commissioners at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission). Swett is a former FERC Staff that served as legal and policy advisor to former FERC Chairman Kevin McIntyre and Commission Bernard McNamee. LaCerte is an attorney in private practice that previously held positions at the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board and the Louisiana Department of Veterans Affairs.

If confirmed, Swett would fill the seat vacated by former Chairman Mark Christie, whose term expired on June 30, 2025, while LaCerte would succeed former Chairman Willie Phillips, who resigned in April at the request of the White House. Swett’s term would run through June 30, 2030, and LaCerte’s through June 30, 2026. Confirmation of both nominees would give Republicans a 3-2 majority on the Commission.

Amid recent debates over the independence of agencies such as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the Federal Reserve, Democrats on the Committee underscored the importance of preserving FERC’s autonomy and protecting its staff from reductions in force. Ranking Member Martin Heinrich (D-NM) stressed that FERC is unique for its statutorily required independence, designed to protect impartial decision-making. He specifically raised concerns about a recent executive order titled, “Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies” (EO 14215), which asserts greater White House control over independent regulatory agencies. Swett affirmed that FERC’s independence is rooted in statute and pledged to base all decisions solely on the law. She also drew on her experience as a former FERC staffer to vouch for protection of the agency’s staff. LaCerte noted that while he would personally welcome a Supreme Court modification of Humphrey’s Executor if revisited, he would “do the utmost of [his] ability under the law to maintain the independence of FERC, a hundred percent.” LaCerte also agreed to protect the agency’s staff.

Alongside independence, senators pressed the nominees on how FERC should address unprecedented demand growth driven by artificial intelligence (AI), data centers and electrification. Swett warned that unmet demand could force data centers abroad, creating national security and economic risks. LaCerte said his approach would be to ask of every decision whether it makes the grid more reliable and affordable. Multiple senators emphasized the urgency of adding resources quickly, with Sen. Angus King (I-ME) noting that wind and solar are both the cheapest and fastest to deploy. Both nominees committed to a technology-neutral approach consistent with the Federal Power Act.

The hearing also highlighted the large backlog of projects awaiting interconnection and the need to expand interstate transmission. Swett noted FERC’s recent interconnection reforms are under judicial review but pledged to work with colleagues on solutions, while LaCerte called the backlog part of a broader set of infrastructure delays facing the energy sector and emphasized collaboration with regional transmission organizations (RTOs), independent system operators (ISOs) and states. Both nominees supported wider deployment of grid-enhancing technologies to maximize existing assets, reduce costs and speed connections.

Looking ahead, Swett’s FERC background may help her secure bipartisan support, while LaCerte may be less likely to attract Democratic backing given concerns about his limited energy experience. Several Democratic senators referenced FERC’s organic act, which requires each commissioner to be “specifically qualified to assess fairly the needs and concerns of all interest affected by federal energy policy.” The nominations advance amid a broader backlog of confirmations in the Senate, leaving the timing uncertain, but members on both sides emphasized the urgency of addressing surging electricity demand, underscoring the need for a fully seated Commission. Akin will continue to monitor the confirmation process and related policy debates over reliability, permitting reform and grid modernization.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

November 25, 2025

We are pleased to share the program materials and a recording of Akin’s recently presented webinar, “Navigating the Evolving Landscape of Corporate PPAs.”

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

November 12, 2025

On November 7, 2025, the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) reversed their prior positions and approved Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 401 Water Quality Certifications and other environmental permits for the Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Company’s (Transco) Northeast Supply Enhancement Project (NESE). NESE is a 25-mile natural gas pipeline expansion project certificated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) that is intended to deliver 400,000 dekatherms per day of natural gas produced in Pennsylvania to local distribution company customers in New York City through new facilities in Middlesex County, New Jersey and an underwater segment traversing the Raritan and Lower New York Bays.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

November 6, 2025

The market for the direct procurement of energy by commercial and industrial buyers has been active in the U.S. for a decade.  In years past, buyers often engaged in such purchases on a voluntary basis to achieve their goals to use renewable energy.  These days, C&I buyers are turning to direct procurement or self-supply to obtain a reliable source of energy.  Sufficient and accessible energy from a local utility may not be available or may be materially delayed or trigger significant capital costs.  This is a material change driven in part by increased demand for electricity, including demand from data centers, EV infrastructure and industrial development.       

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 27, 2025

On October 23, 2025, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) directed the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to conduct a rulemaking to assert jurisdiction over load interconnections to the bulk electric transmission system and establish standardized procedures for the interconnection of large loads.1 The Directive included an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (ANOPR) that sets forth the legal justification for asserting jurisdiction over transmission-level load interconnections and fourteen principles that should inform FERC’s rulemaking process. The Secretary has directed FERC to take “final action” on the Directive no later than April 30, 2026.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.